The King of Cash is Apple CEO Steve Jobs

“How much cash does Apple have? So much that even the hard-bitten investment analysts who cover the company for a living are sometimes in awe,” Brian Caulfield reports for Forbes.

“With automakers, insurance companies and banks going to the U.S. government and begging for bailout money, Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs took a moment during last month’s earnings conference call to call attention to his company’s massive $24.5 billion pile of cash and short-term investments,” Caulfield reports.

‘I think you could hire almost every engineer in Silicon Valley on a lifetime employment contract and not really dent that significant cash horde that you have,’ Bernstein Research senior analyst Toni Sacconaghi said on the earnings call,” Caulfield reports. “‘There’s going to be some significant opportunities,’ Jobs replied dryly. ‘I think hiring every engineer in Silicon Valley is a good idea, though. Thanks.'”

Caulfield reports, “The bottom line: Jobs is the king of cash, he can do anything.”

Full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Carl H.” for the heads up.]

52 Comments

  1. “The Republican Party used to be the small government party devoted to individual liberty.”

    Yeah about 150 years ago, before the parties shifted angles. Don’t make blanket statements…the problem with them is that people start to believe them over time.

    Steve Jobs isn’t king, he’s just really smart. He knows his shite. Plus he has really good people working for him.

  2. @Vladimir Putin
    Oh no, not the commie fear mongering all over again. I thought that died in the 80′.

    War is profitable. It’s just like any other business, in incurs risks but it can also pay back handsomely. Russia might have a lot of oil, but it still needs customers with liquidity to buy it, and investment to drill it out. Nope, the cold war will not happen again, or at least not in the same way you would love to see. The world is more interdependent as globalization is no longer an idea, but a reality. Russia can not form a strong enough coalition to do anything anymore. The cold war has ravaged their economy and if you think the U.S. is in trouble, think again. It’s the world economy that is in trouble. Russia has had to stop it’s stock market from trading several times this year. They have not the power of influence they once had. Why do you think all this posturing is happening.

  3. Metryq and Au contraire,

    No mention was ever made by any candidate about redistributing wealth already earned and in the bank. When tax cuts are given to the ultra-wealthy, that is also redistribution. When things start working again and we are once again respected around the world will you admit you were wrong? No, it will be the great silence.

  4. Dear Blind Fscks,

    Reuters (Thu Nov 6, 1:17 am ET): Putin may return to Kremlin in ’09: report

    Russian President Dmitry Medvedev could resign from his post in 2009 to pave the way for Vladimir Putin to return to the Kremlin, Vedomosti newspaper reported on Thursday, citing an unidentified source close to the Kremlin.

    Medvedev Wednesday proposed increasing the presidential term to six years from four years, a step the newspaper said was part of a plan drawn up by Vladislav Surkov, who serves as Medvedev’s first deputy chief of staff.

    Under the plan, Medvedev could implement changes to the constitution and unpopular social reforms “so that Putin could return to the Kremlin for a longer period,” the newspaper said.

    “Under this scenario Medvedev could resign early citing changes to the constitution and then presidential elections could take place in 2009,” the newspaper said, citing the unidentified source close to the Kremlin.

    The paper said Putin, who is currently prime minister, could then rule for two six year terms, so from 2009 to 2021. The paper cited Putin’s spokesman as saying he saw no reason for Putin to return to power in 2009.

    Investors, already jittery over the impact of the financial crisis on Russia’s economic boom, are trying to work out who is really in charge of Russia, the biggest question for those seeking to ascertain political risk.

    They are seeking any details on how the current set up — with Medvedev as president and Putin as prime minister — could change. During Medvedev’s speech Wednesday the Russian stock market erased most of the gains it made earlier in the day.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081106/wl_nm/us_russia_medvedev_putin

    Good job Obamatards. The blood will be on your hands.

  5. Nathan,

    Obama has no foreign policy experience – or much of any other meaningful experience for that matter – and Biden is a total fsck up whose foot is perpetually in his mouth.

    Putin will toy with the totally naive Obama and the U.S.

    This election could go down as a total disaster for the U.S. simply because easily-duped people were told they wanted “change” by the media.

    Change for change’s sake is folly.

    Maybe we’ll be lucky, but the fact is: nobody knows what the heck we’re getting with Obama besides a guy who can read the teleprompter well and whose past votes side with the radical left.

  6. Haven’t the Obamatards read the newspaper the last couple of days? Just FOUR HOURS after Obama’s election, Russia freaked out Eastern Europe by declaring they will deploy short-range NUCLEAR MISSILES on their border targeting Poland and the Baltics. As if that wasn’t enough, they declared they will jam NATO early warning radars to be deployed on the soil of Poland and the Czech Republic. Get all that? Do you any of you reality-challenged “change” voters think that’s what Russia would have done if McCain had been elected. Any word from The One on how he will react? Is this the “change” we’ve all been waiting for???

  7. @Kate

    Bush is STILL in office and what has Bush said he will do about the short-range missiles? Huh? It is still HIS problem.

    Relax, sweety, anyone can act tough. GW has been acting tough to make up for his insecurities for 8 years.

    Obama will be tough when he has to, but only after considering long and hard the risk to American soldiers and innocent civilians. Something GW never considered.

  8. iamdj,

    Yeah, Bush “never considered the risks to American soldiers and innocent civilians.”

    Are you serious? If so, do you understand, even remotely, how silly you sound?

    Fscking retards.

    Get real, before it’s too late – oh wait, it might already be.

  9. Okay, but the point of the article wasn’t to note that Apple has huge stacks of cash.

    That’s not news.

    The point of the exercise is to ask readers “What should Apple do with all that cash?”

    Seriously, I could ask analysts, or speculate on it all day. But I’m more interested in what hard-core Apple people think.

    What should Apple do with all that cash? Come over to Forbes.com and tell us.

    http://rate.forbes.com/comments/CommentServlet?op=cpage&sourcename=story&StoryURI=2008/11/05/tech-cash-kings-tech-enter-cx_bc_1105cashkings.html

  10. But Metryq is right… All you Lib Mac fanboys voted for this socialist idiot..

    Steve ought to give some of the 25 billion to welfare bums, crackheads, and other people not interested in employment…

    President Hussein said to Share the Wealth!!! Time to Jump in!!!!! Time to be Patriotic!! Spread it around!!! Come on Mr. Jobs, …. You’re a bleeding heart liberal… Give some of Apple’s hard earned money away to trash like Peggy Joseph (she needs gasoline and her mortgage paid)… You don’t need all that money!!

    PS.. Stock market hits record 2 day crash!!!! Sounds like investors are crazy about the prospect of President Socialist..

  11. Is this a Macintosh board or a political board?

    If you want to get political, realize that Apple spent $100,000 to fight Proposition 8 in California, extends benefits to same-sex couples, has a primarily liberal workforce, and that Steve Jobs almost certainly voted for Obama. Given this, why don’t all of you who are so scandalized by Obama’s victory–Obama’s overwhelming victory–dump your Macs, buy PCs, and find some other board on which to spread your ignorance and hate?

  12. 2008 turnout same as or only slightly higher than 2004.

    So much for the huge groundswell of excitement for Obama.

    Fake media creation.

    57.7 million people or 46.2%, nearly 1 out of every 2 voters voted for John McCain.

    57.7 million people voted against Barack Obama.

    John McCain carried 22 states of of 50. Nearly half of the United States voted for McCain, not Barack Obama.

    Barack Obama: Empty suit. Fake media creation that every other voter did not want in office.

    This is what a real landslide and mandate looks like:

    1984: Ronald Reagan carried 49 states – 21 more states than Barack Obama – and garnered nearly 60% of the vote, 20 points higher than his inept Dem challenger, Mondale.

    I now return you to Mainstream Media Fantasyland, where everyone loves Barack Obama and his giant landslide victory / mandate and cannot wait for his lavish over-the-top, expensive inaugural ball packed with uneducated Hollywood celebrities.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.