Apple’s WWDC banners show OS X without the ‘Mac’

“No run-up to Macworld Expo or WWDC is complete without the spy shots of the banners inside San Francisco’s Moscone Center, and this time is no different,” Nick Mediati writes for The Apple Blog.

“Now making the rounds is a Flickr photoset of banners hung outside the keynote hall posted by Gernot Poetsch. One in particular is especially interesting. It shows two banners: one referring to the iPhone’s OS as ‘OS X iPhone’ and another referring to Mac OS X 10.5 as simply ‘OS X Leopard.’ No mention of ‘Mac’ anywhere,” Mediati writes. “This would mark the first time, well, ever, that Apple has referred to the Mac’s operating system without including ‘Mac’ or ‘Macintosh’ in its name.”

Mediati asks, “Has anyone noticed that Apple has been remarkably silent in regards to the Psystar Open Computer?”

Full article here.

66 Comments

  1. It is THE platform for many hardware possibilities in the future.

    It makes sense to refer to it as simply OS X and not tie it only to the desktop/notebook as we know it today.

    Clones again? I don’t think so. Vertical integration is still the best way to make a product from head to toe.

  2. Hrm, I think it’s more likely they’re introducing some sort of tablet or “in between” type of computer than that they will allow 3rd party vendors (esp. one like Pystar!) to use their OS.

    Just my 2 cents.

  3. Wow, so maybe the Clone Wars will begin again? Ugh, not looking forward to that. OSX and Macs works so well together because they are designed with specific hardware constraints and not just whatever spare parts some noodle-headed tech geek has lying around his parent’s basement.

  4. interesting the colors they have chosen. purple on one side and blue on the other, like two things are converging. is this a mixing of two things? purple of os x leopard and blue of windows? also, what about that invite card from long ago where they had the two golden gate bridges coming together into one. wasn’t that for wwdc 08? hmmm.

  5. This makes sense. Sort of.

    The change from PowerBook to MacBook and the decision to use Mac in it’s product names, really focuses on Macs as Macs. MB, MBP, MBA, Mac Pro.

    Separating out “OS X” as a distinct brand in this way is interesting. Seems like it’s in flux (with recent references to “Cocoa Touch”).

    But making “OS X” the major brand of their superior software seems right to me.

    Yeah, a little weird to have OS X iPhone, which is basically, but not exactly, has the iPhone software.

    Anyway, I think the point is enforcing the the “OS X” brand, emphasize the Mac as a physical product, and focusing on the iPhone, as opposed to the iPod Touch, which will ultimately be seen as a stop-gap measure.

  6. No clone wars. No going straight to Dell. The end is not near. It’s simply this:

    OS X is no longer exclusive to the Desktop / Laptop platform. It runs on several different devices now (iPhone, iPod touch, new iPhone, Apple TV … and whatever else might get announced at the conference), hence it no longer makes sense to advertise it as being only for the Mac.

  7. Maybe Snow Leopard will be for non-Apple hardware?

    I doubt it, but I thought I’d join the world of Apple rumors ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”LOL” style=”border:0;” />

  8. @Dasgeek
    “It is a SOFTWARE developer’s conference.”

    No it’s not. It is both a HARDWARE and a SOFTWARE conference. Some developers also make HARDWARE for the Mac and other Apple devices and Apple helps them for their HARDWARE products (and it’s not just about drivers).

    MDN word = more, like in: it’s MORE than just SOFTWARE

  9. This is a developers’ conference, and from the developers’ standpoint, OS X has two versions. The banners are making the distinction that way because OS X on the Mac has a name (Leopard) but OS X on the iPhone does not. Otherwise the banners would be OS X Leopard and OS X Kitten (or whatever).

    The workshops are divided into iPhone and Mac, and this reflects that.

    It says nothing about hardware. OS X on a tablet or a new laptop or whatever would still be OS X Leopard.

    Apple TV is left out because it is not a development platform and there are consequentially no sessions for it.

  10. Apple is just moving it’s naming forward to reflect that OSX is used on more then just the Mac. I don’t see licensing clones because will every PC can be a clone these days. But, Apple selling a Full Licensed Non-Upgrade copy of OSX for about $229.00 to $249.00 that can be installed on any PC is a possibility (OS X Snow Leopard with no Apple Drivers, no Rosetta, No PPC support and no support for Apple Hardware) would kinda fit a plan for a direct attack on MS Windows Vista. I don’t see them doing any Apple OEM Licensing deals for it though. If you want OSX you have to purchase full retail licensed copies.

  11. No, I don’t think the reason to leave out Mac is because of clones as the article implies (Psystar Open Computer). In fact, if you go by the history, the original operating system for Macintosh is called System followed by its version number (System 1-7.5.3). The inclusion of the word Mac in the next version, Mac OS 7.6, was precisely because of Apple’s decision to let other companies to license the OS for Mac clones.

    So, the argument that Apple will allow clones again because Apple struck off the word Mac from OS X banners doesn’t make sense.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.