“According to our anonymous tipster, .Mac will undergo a complete revamp that will coincide with the iPhone 2.0 launch (which everyone expects to occur at WWDC 08),” Cory Bohon reports for TUAW.
Bohon mentions:
• .Mac push e-mail coming to iPhone 2.0
• Full over-the-air syncing including calendars, contacts, and email (similar to Exchange)
• .Mac syncing on Windows
Full article here.
Apple this week announced new progress to expand clean energy around the world and advance momentum toward Apple 2030, the…
Taylor Swift’s “Tortured Poets Department” meeting has officially been called into session and, surprise, it’s a 31-song mega double album…
Apple said on Friday it had removed Meta Platforms’ Threads and WhatsApp apps from its App Store in China after being ordered to do so…
Apple is touting its Vision Pro spatial computing headset which was made available in the U.S. earlier this year to businesses…
Even if the iPhones looked good enough for resale, Apple’s contract with its recycler GEEP explicitly required that every product it sent be…
The changes might justify the cost of the membership. Apple should at least give a free year with new purchases. The 60 day trial is just too limited.
iPod touch… $20 upgrade again?
Exactly what I’ve beens aying SHOULD happen since launch. Thank you.
Cloud Computing® is go! Mobile Me, anyone?
P.S. Does this mean anything for Yahoo! push e-mail?
This rocks!!! On a comical note this is just what Bill Gates said in his keynote in January (“Cloud computing”, “everything we do will be over the internet” , “online storage” etc.). It’s hilarious that Apple will be the first company to make it come true! How long will he let Ballmer run the show?
Disclaimer: I don’t follow Bill Gates keynotes at all, this is the part I picked up in a short article so I could be wrong.
This story is all over the place the last couple of days and I just want to point out how dumb it is.
The header is always “Major re-vamp of .Mac services” and then all that is mentioned is over the air syncing for iPhone. Those two things are incompatible.
I have .Mac already and the mail already syncs so frequently that it’s virtually indistinguishable from push email anyway. If you have .Mac, all your computers are already synced (contacts, bookmarks, email, and much more), and your iPhone or iPod touch syncs with one of those computers, so it already is in constant sync with everything anyway.
Sure it would be nice to have over the air syncing for portables, but this just doesn’t equate to “a major revamp.”
Also, all those people whining about the “expensive” 100 bucks a year fee are idiots IMO. It works out to 8 or 9 bucks a month for cripes sake! How is it that people are perfectly okay paying 600 bucks for a phone and 100 bucks a month to the phone company for the privilege of using it, but the price of a couple of cups of coffee is too much to pay for an online portal?
“Revamp”? When was it vamped?
I guess I don’t understand what .Mac push email will do, since my iPhone gets my email as soon as my computer. Corporate emails servers and such? Mine is already forwarded to my .Mac, but I guess this way you can keep them separate, rather than combined?
@ Johnsson:
Who DOES follow a Gates keynote any more? The man is so out of touch.
” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />
These would be very welcome changes to .Mac. I do find WWDC a curious place to introduce them, considering that it’s a developers’ conference and Apple usually gears product announcements to that. Maybe the iPhone developer kit is enough justification, or they just plain don’t care.
I’ve had .Mac since it was iTools (free), and I love it. Effortless website creation, Photocasting with my scattered family, Sync from my MacBook to my iMac to my work Mac Pro, iDisk (use Transmit to access files, it is 1000 times faster than Finder) and my name @mac.com
It just doesn’t get any sweeter!
Will it be free?
I’ve so far not been interested in a .Mac account. The price, storage and features aren’t all that compelling to me, yet.
I think Apple should take some of that big pile of cash they’re sitting on and set up a .Mac network with a meaningful amount of storage AT NO COST to customers who have purchased both Macs and iPhones/Touch.
It would provide a great incentive to those of us who have invested in the technology. Maybe everyone would get free .Mac with something like 5 GB of storage, and then those who need more storage than that can buy it at something like $10 per month for each additional 10 gigs.
Even my wife’s crappy hotmail account gets her 5 gigs of space for no cost (other than some mildly annoying ads).
Apple should at least set aside enough free storage for iCal information to be stored. That alone would be compelling and would sell some systems.
I want to be able to use my iDisk on my iPhone. I want it to work like Box.net kinda sorta.
Question: “iPod touch… $20 upgrade again?” – John Gee
Answer: Yes!
Question: “Does this mean anything for Yahoo! push e-mail?” – Connor MacBook
Answer: Yes, and even more!
Question: “Will it be free?” – iDon’t
Answer: No, never from Apple!
“I think Apple should take some of that big pile of cash they’re sitting on and set up a .Mac network with a meaningful amount of storage AT NO COST to customers who have purchased both Macs and iPhones/Touch.”
Great idea but will it be sustainable on the long run? I have my doubts… won’t the costs eat all their so called big pile of cash?
@Midwest Mac
It WAS free. It was called iTools.
More storage? Faster file transfers?
The best way to revamp .Mac and to make anyone really use it and take it seriously would be to offer it for free with a registered Mac, iPhone, or iPod purchase. Truth is, I used EWorld more than I have my trials of .Mac. iDisk made a turtle look like a Ferrari.
Super pump it up, then make it free, and it could make the other social networks look like Hillary in a thong in comparison.
Sounds like .Mac will be more integrated with web browsers. Calenders can’t be accessed via a web browser which can be a pain when you don’t have your mac with you.
Apple needs to have /Mac work with PCs if they want to be used in businesses. Licencing exchange means that they can now connect ot those servers. It’s the thin edge of the wedge. M$ did it to Apple in the 80’s and 90’s and now it’s pay back time.
I’ve been rocking the .Windows service since its inception. It has great tools for updating Excel charts remotely, topping off Zune points and viewing ad-supported faxes through the Outlook interface when I’m on the road. My e-mail address is an @windows.com address!
I am especially excited about the prospects for a ZunePhone tie-in in the near future. I’m looking forward to further leaks about that soon.
Your potential. Our passion.™
I’m another of those “used .Mac since it was iTools” guys. And I’ve been happy with it, mostly. A little grumpy about the latest “bargain” … $30 off iLife ’08? I bought a Family Pack months ago! The package seems to be continuously a step behind the other “cloud” packages, relying on “elegance” and the fact that the others offer either overkill or ads. I was just about to reconsider just before the last revamp. Another revamp is due. The mentioned upgrades, though, are less than compelling.
And, yes … I agree with those who feel that six months or a year of ‘free’ .Mac service ought to go along with a Mac purchase. Or, perhaps, a cost reduction based on the cost of the product you bought.
I’ve been in since iTools as well. The Sync feature alone makes the price worth it, since I have machines all over at work and home and elsewhere. Happiness is never having to figure out where your bookmarks are.
But there is a lot I just plain don’t use. I don’t really use my email account much. I have my own web server so the only thing they’re hosting is some old photo albums.
100 bucks is still a bit steep.
@Mac+
I honestly don’t know what it would cost Apple to host a bunch of servers for people to use in the long term. But, for most people, even 1 gig would be enough space to utilize most of the features of .Mac — especially syncing e-mail and iCal stuff.
I’m just saying that it adds value to the devices that Apple sells, and guys like me don’t feel like paying $100 or so a year to take advantage of some nifty built-in features — no matter how nifty they are.
That, or give people a YEAR free instead of 60 days. For me, two months isn’t enough time to really use something enough to never be able to live without it ever again . . .
@ MidWest Mac
True. I can’t remember how long iTools was free, but it was enough to get me hooked.
Over-the-air syncing…. that is exactly what I have been wanting with the iPhone. I am PSYCHED!