“After three months with Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard Version 10.5, I have three main things to say about it. First: Despite minor problems, it’s by far the best operating system ever written for the vast majority of consumers, with dozens of new features that have real practical value—like truly automated backups, document and spreadsheet preview images in folders, and notes and to-do lists integrated into the mail program,” Edward Mendelson reports for PC Magazine.
“For the average user, Leopard is the most polished and easiest to use OS I’ve tested. Second: Leopard started out with a generous share of first-version glitches, but almost all of them have now been resolved by the second of two automated updates, which brings Leopard up to version 10.5.2,” Mendelson reports.
“Finally, Leopard is extravagantly overdressed for the jobs that it’s designed to do, and its pervasive eye-candy starts out looking dazzling but soon becomes distracting. Fortunately, from the beginning, the OS started out with options that let you put it on a low-eye-sugar diet, and the latest update has even more,” Mendelson reports.
“Leopard again raises the question of whether to switch from Windows to a Mac. I’ve found Vista to be a major disappointment that tends to look worse the more I use it. I still use Windows XP for getting serious work done in long, complicated documents. But OS X is easier to manage and maintain and I vastly prefer OS X to Windows for Web-browsing, mail, and especially for any task that involves graphics, music, or video,” Mendelson reports.
MacDailyNews Take: Macs are perfectly capable of getting “serious work done in long, complicated documents.” Mendelson is writing for PC Magazine and is merely throwing his readers – the Windows sufferers – a bone. After this review, they need something, however meager it may be, to assuage the brutal assault their OS of “non-choice” has just taken. As we all know, most Mac users have slummed it with Windows; often by force in school and/or at work. Mac users have made a conscious technology choice and are therefore better informed than most Windows sufferers. Mac users execute “serious work done in long, complicated documents” daily.
“Leopard performs all such tasks even better than previous versions did—and Leopard is the only OS on the planet that works effortlessly and intuitively in today’s world of networked computers and peripherals. Leopard is far from perfect, but it’s better than any alternative, and it’s getting harder and harder to find good reasons to use anything else,” Mendelson reports.
Full review, 4.5 out of 5 stars, here.
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Island Girl” for the heads up.]
Related articles:
Mercury News: There’s never been a better time to switch to Apple Mac – February 19, 2008
Chris Pirillo: 50 Reasons to switch from Microsoft Windows to Apple’s Mac OS X
– February 18, 2008
InfoWorld: Time to dump Microsoft’s Windows and ‘Get a Mac?’ – February 18, 2008
PC Mag: Apple’s Mac OS X 10.5.2 Leopard is strongest case yet for Windows PC users to switch to Mac – February 15, 2008
Microsoft’s Windows Vista one year later: ‘the chrome has worn off the turd’ – January 30, 2008
Laptop Magazine offers online Windows to Mac Switcher’s Guide – January 30, 2008
Microsoft’s Windows Vista: Your Frustration. Our Fault. – January 30, 2008
ExtremeTech: Microsoft’s Windows Vista simply can’t compete with Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard – November 12, 2007
Computerworld: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard spanks Microsoft’s Windows Vista – November 07, 2007
Salon: It’s time to buy an Apple Mac; Macs cost less to own than PCs – November 06, 2007
Chicago Tribune reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: Further proof that computing needn’t be stressful – November 03, 2007
Fast Company: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard handily outshines all other computing interfaces – November 02, 2007
Houston Chronicle reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: A winner for Mac users and Windows switchers – November 01, 2007
MSNBC reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: ‘An even better experience with an already excellent OS’ – November 01, 2007
PC Magazine reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: ‘By far the best operating system ever written…’ – October 30, 2007
Apple sells two million copies of Mac OS X Leopard in first weekend – October 30, 2007
CNET’s Reisinger: Apple’s Leopard will open the Mac OS X floodgates and embarrass Microsoft – October 29, 2007
ZDNet’s Kingsley-Hughes: Mac OS X Leopard’s Time Machine ‘brilliant, fantastic, an absolute winner’ – October 29, 2007
Ars Technica reviews Apple’s Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard: ‘Absolutely packed with improvements’ – October 29, 2007
BBC: Apple’s new Mac OS X Leopard’s Time Machine and Quick Look alone worth upgrading – October 29, 2007
CNET’s Reisinger: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard’s Time Machine interface is perfect – October 27, 2007
IT Business: US$129 for Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard is money well spent – October 27, 2007
Guardian Unlimited reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: ‘a very solid platform for the future’ – October 26, 2007
CNET reviews Apple’s Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard: ‘Excellent’ – October 26, 2007
Dallas Morning News: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard is a leap forward – October 26, 2007
Apple pulls wireless backup from initial Mac OS X Leopard release – October 26, 2007
Wired: Mac OS X Leopard may be Apple’s most revolutionary product release of 2007 – October 25, 2007
Technology Review: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard is ‘visually stunning, fast and stable’ – October 25, 2007
USA Today: With Leopard, Apple’s already superior Mac OS X widens lead over Microsoft’s Windows – October 25, 2007
New York Times’ Pogue reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: ‘Powerful and polished’ – October 25, 2007
Mossberg reviews Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard: ‘better and faster than Windows Vista’ – October 25, 2007
Mac OS X Leopard’s new Time Machine – October 12, 2007
Microsoft must abandon the Windows Vista albatross – September 26, 2007
Forbes: Microsoft’s Windows Vista and Office ‘Blunder 2007’ will drive a lot of users to Apple – September 17, 2007
NPD: Windows Vista retail sales down down 60-percent vs. XP – September 11, 2007
Apple’s Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard shames Microsoft’s Windows Vista – August 31, 2007
Pioneer Press reviews Apple iMac: ‘An ideal family computer; Mac OS X puts Vista to shame’ – August 17, 2007
2008 Olympic Games dump unstable, unreliable Windows Vista – August 16, 2007
Vista Nightmare: The ‘Oww!’ Starts Now – July 28, 2007
Ballmer: ‘Vista doesn’t get done by three people in a garage in three days’ – July 27, 2007
Acer chief slams Microsoft: ‘The entire industry is disappointed by Windows Vista’ – July 23, 2007
Mercury News: Mac OS X already beats Windows Vista, Leopard will widen the gap – June 12, 2007
Apple ought to send Microsoft flowers and nice ‘Thank You’ note for Windows Vista – May 21, 2007
U.S. News & World Report: Apple Macs are attractive, stable, secure, and more fun than Windows – May 16, 2007
The full horror of Windows Vista – May 14, 2007
Apple need not rush Mac OS X Leopard to market; Tiger already superior to Windows Vista – May 03, 2007
IDC: Apple Mac shows market share gains despite launch of Windows Vista – April 30, 2007
Windows Vista: Emperor Microsoft’s new clothes – April 29, 2007
Forget VIsta: Beleaguered Dell brings back Windows XP, people also asking for Mac OS X – April 19, 2007
Windows user spends 30 Days with Windows Vista: ‘It’s a lemon, an unstable operating system’ – April 04, 2007
Network World: Need a new PC for Vista? Switching to Mac may cost less and give you more – March 16, 2007
Analyst: Microsoft’s Windows Vista is very good for Apple Mac – March 13, 2007
The Register reviews Microsoft’s Windows Vista: ‘Don’t buy it’ – February 20, 2007
Forbes: ‘Windows Vista utterly unimaginative, internally discordant and woefully out of tune’ – February 09, 2007
Windows sufferer spends six hours trying to ‘upgrade’ to Vista, says: ‘I should’ve bought a Mac’ – February 07, 2007
Windows Vista woes push BBC News editor to regret never having ‘defected’ to Apple Mac – February 06, 2007
Microsoft’s Windows Vista: Five years for a chrome-plated turd – January 30, 2007
Digit: ‘Microsoft’s Windows Vista may be the best reason yet to buy an Apple Mac’ – January 29, 2007
Pioneer Press: Windows Vista shows ‘Apple is an innovation engine; Microsoft, not so much’ – January 29, 2007
Windows Vista disappoints, so get a Mac – January 29, 2007
Analyst: Microsoft’s Windows Vista could be an opportunity for Apple – January 26, 2007
CNET Reviews Windows Vista: Is that all? Clunky and not very intuitive vs. Mac OS X; warmed-over XP – January 24, 2007
InformationWeek Review: Apple’s Mac OS X shines in comparison with Microsoft’s Windows Vista – January 06, 2007
Computerworld: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard’s ‘Time Machine’ is truly remarkable – October 05, 2006
Microsoft Windows Vista: If you can’t innovate… try to impersonate Apple’s Mac OS X – August 10, 2006
Analyst: Apple’s new Mac OS X Leopard sets new bar, leaves Microsoft’s Vista in the dust – August 08, 2006
eWeek: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard with 3-D Time Machine is amazing – August 08, 2006
Computerworld: Microsoft Windows Vista a distant second-best to Apple Mac OS X – June 02, 2006
Moving train wreck that is Windows Vista to leave the station in late 2006/early 2007 – June 01, 2006
How to delete a shortcut in Windows Vista in just 7 steps – June 01, 2006
Pirillo critiques Windows Vista with long lists of mistakes – May 30, 2006
Video of Microsoft’s Windows Vista beta 2 release in action – May 23, 2006
Report: Microsoft Windows Vista could drive users even more nuts than usual – May 16, 2006
Yankee Group: Windows Vista to alienate business with disruptive security features – May 09, 2006
Windows Vista to be Microsoft’s last operating system? – April 21, 2006
Thurrott: Microsoft collapsing under its own weight, Gates has driven Windows Vista into the ground – April 20, 2006
Microsoft employees call for heads to roll over continual Vista slips – March 27, 2006
Microsoft’s Windows Albatross, er Vista could slip even more – March 27, 2006
Microsoft Vista fumble could lead to score for Apple Mac; Mac OS X Leopard may beat Vista to market – March 23, 2006
What’s the difference between Mac OS X and Vista? Microsoft employees are excited about Mac OS X – March 22, 2006
Microsoft delays Windows Vista again – this time until January 2007 – March 21, 2006
Thurrott: Microsoft going to get eaten alive over Windows Vista’s resemblance to Apple’s Mac OS X – March 09, 2006
Episode 2 of Microsoft Windows Vista, Bill Gates CES keynote video spoof now online – January 07, 2006
Microsoft Windows Vista, Bill Gates keynote video spoof debuts online – January 06, 2006
NY Times’ Pogue on Gates’ CES demo: Most of Vista features unadulterated ripoffs from Apple Mac OS X – January 05, 2006
Analyst: Windows Vista may still impress many consumers because they have not seen Apple’s Mac OS X – January 05, 2006
Microsoft Windows Vista compared to Apple Mac OS X – December 05, 2005
Gartner: Ignore Microsoft Windows Vista until 2008 (why not just get Apple Mac OS X Tiger today?) – November 12, 2005
Microsoft’s Windows Vista strives to deliver what Apple’s Mac OS X already offers – October 10, 2005
Thurrott: Microsoft’s Windows Vista Beta 1 vs. Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger – August 29, 2005
Apple to unleash Leopard on Microsoft’s Windows Longhorn; Mac OS X 10.5 due late 2006 – early 2007 – June 07, 2005
Thurrott: many of Windows Vista’s upcoming features appeared first in Apple’s Mac OS X – September 26, 2005
Microsoft’s Ballmer: It’s true, some of Windows Vista’s features are ‘kissing cousins’ to Mac OS X – September 19, 2005
Microsoft suffers from malaise, key defections, Windows Vista struggles, lack of towels – September 16, 2005
PC World: Microsoft innovation – an oxymoron – September 15, 2005
Microsoft debuts Dashboard Widgets, er, ‘Microsoft Gadgets’ – September 13, 2005
Apple to unleash Leopard on Microsoft’s Windows Longhorn; Mac OS X 10.5 due late 2006 – early 2007 – June 07, 2005
Windows tech writer Thurrott: ‘In many ways, Mac OS X Tiger is simply better than Windows’ – May 07, 2005
Thurrott: ‘Longhorn is in complete disarray and in danger of collapsing under its own weight’ – April 27, 2005
Thurrott: Longhorn ‘has the makings of a train wreck’ – April 26, 2005
Thurrott: Longhorn demos ‘unimpressive, fall short of graphical excellence found today in Mac OS X’ – April 26, 2005
Microsoft employees leaving due to (and blogging about) malaise smothering company – April 25, 2005
eWEEK Editor Coursey: Longhorn so far ‘looks shockingly like a Macintosh’ – April 25, 2005
Due in late 2006, many of Windows Longhorn’s features have been in Mac OS X since 2001 – April 25, 2005
Microsoft’s Windows Longhorn will bear more than just a passing resemblance to Apple’s Mac OS X – April 15, 2005
The Age: ‘Apple’s Mac OS X at least a generation ahead of Windows XP, iMac G5 clearly the best’ – December 15, 2004
Apple CEO Steve Jobs: Mac OS X Tiger ‘is going to drive the copycats crazy – June 28, 2004
Apple’s CEO Steve Jobs previews Mac OS X 10.4 ‘Tiger’ to ship in the first half of 2005 – June 28, 2004
Apple takes dead aim at Microsoft, ‘Longhorn’ with WWDC Mac OS X 10.4 ‘Tiger’ ads – June 28, 2004
PC Magazine: Microsoft ‘Longhorn’ preview shows ‘an Apple look’ – May 06, 2004
Windows ‘Longhorn’ to add translucent windows that ripple and shrink by 2005 – May 19, 2003
Apple leads; Wintel follows as usual – November 11, 2002
I have written four novels using Pages on a Mac. Longest was over 500 pages. Numerous margin notes, and embedded graphics.
Word crapped out at 300 pages, became very unstable (even on a maxed-out MacPro.
“PCs are for serious work,” is a myth. More to the point, “PCs are serious work.”
Serious work??? Oh, Like updating virus signatures and maintaining spyware updates and responding to Vista’s “security” popup windows… “Cancel or Allow”
Mike Erganian: What is the subject of your book? Non fiction?
Miles Raymond: Uh, no. It’s… it’s a novel. Fiction. Yes. Although there is quite a bit from my own life… so I suppose that, technically some of it is nonfiction.
Mike Erganian: Good I like non fiction. There is so much to know about this world. I think you read something somebody just invented, waste of time.
Miles Raymond: That’s an interesting perspective.
One fun feature of Leopard is the ability to use one mouse to control two computers by sharing screens.
For example I have two iMacs side by side, but having two keyboards + trackballs to match, I discovered with screen sharing I can control the second iMac just fine, except that it takes space on my monitor to do that. So I’m going to add another monitor to iMac one which will free up space so that I can use one keyboard and one trackball….
Of course, for serious work I use Parallels & XP, as in where the OS X software isn’t ready yet. But for really serious work, where the XP software isn’t ready yet, well, that just leaves me the bug free, virus free (seriously, however unbelievable it may be) OS X 10.5.2 alternative. But of course, they can both work coherently, using Parallels. The Pee Cee people reading this may not be clued in yet, which is why I’m righting(!) this bit.
Here’s the email I sent Mr. Mendelson.
MacDailyNews Take: Macs are perfectly capable of getting “serious work done in long, complicated documents.” Mendelson is writing for PC Magazine and simply throwing the Windows sufferers a bone. After this review, they need something, however meager it may be, to assuage the brutal assault their OS of “non-choice” has just taken.
Reader Feedback: ( = registered)
Feb 21, 08 – 09:48 amComment from: January 24, 1984
I have written four novels using Pages on a Mac. Longest was over 500 pages. Numerous margin notes, and embedded graphics.
Word crapped out at 300 pages, became very unstable (even on a maxed-out MacPro).
“PCs are for serious work,” is a myth. More to the point, “PCs are serious work.”
Feb 21, 08 – 09:52 am. Comment from: iLuvMyMacs
Serious work??? Oh, Like updating virus signatures and maintaining spyware updates and responding to Vista’s “security” popup windows… “Cancel or Allow”
bye bye office mac – thank god (jobs) for iwork – nice hedge really predicting that microsoft would cripple office when osx started getting traction (a la – DOS ain’t done ’til lotus wont run). and this shite elements gallery (anyway stolen from iwork) and no option to hide it.
Vista looks worse as you use it whereas OS X just gets better. OS X has little things to constantly discover and integrate into your work.
nell: Which elements gallery? Mine closes when I click on any one of the tabs.
Of course it’s difficult to do long documents in Office Mac. Like all Microsoft programs, they’re absolutely terrible and barely usable. Unfortunately, I’m tethered to Entourage because my office email is on Exchange (and they won’t open IMAP even within the network), and my company is a financial communications company, so all these lemmings think Excel and Word are the be all end all.
The only programs that crash regularly on my Mac Pro are Office programs. The only programs that don’t properly bind to Spaces are Office programs. The only programs that don’t load typefaces correctly are Office programs. In short, the only programs that don’t work as they should are Office programs. Our IT department was noticeably taken aback when they saw the folder on my dock labeled “Mediocrity That’s Forced Upon Me” contained Office.
Mr. Mendelson has written a very objective review that is 98% positive while noting a few minor glitches. Overall it is one of the strongest calls for Windows users to move to Macs to date. This nitpicking and snarky retorts to Mendelson’s one or two legitimate observations is counterproductive and small.
MDN, you fail to note the context in which Mendelson makes his “serious work” comment. Earlier in the article he stated that he lives in MS Word. Not surprising for someone who has long made their living from writing. He went on to say how Word on the Mac is nowhere near as good as the Windows version; an assertion that anyone who has used both would support as totally true. He doesn’t blame the Mac for Word’s failure. It is only because of the Mac version of Word (MS’ failure) that he reverts to Windows Word for what he considers ‘serious work’. For ALL else he prefers OS X and says so. Give the guy some kudos instead of criticism.
“Finally, Leopard is extravagantly overdressed for the jobs that it’s designed to do, and its pervasive eye-candy starts out looking dazzling but soon becomes distracting.”
Uh, maybe it’s just me, but hasn’t OS X looked pretty much the same for the last, oh, 8 years or so? Aside from the ridiculously overblown interface of Time Machine… are you saying that the switch from brushed metal just blew your mind?
For his “long, complicated documents”, I have one word: Mellel
(http://www.redlers.com/mellel.html)
@ Jay-Z
I love your comment about having a folder on your Windows desktop called: “Mediocrity That’s Forced Upon Me”. I’m going to do that at work. I already make my office mates wonder why my MS Recycle Bin is in the lower right hand corner of my screen.
By the way, sitting in an IT meeting at my office the other day (a totally Windows organization), I asked how many people had put Vista on their home machines and how was it going. I then sat through 30 minutes of listening to pain and agony and excuses from the Windows sufferers. I ended the conversation and meeting by saying: I wish I could say I feel your pain, but I don’t. My family uses only Macs. Silence ensured.
“I already make my office mates wonder why my MS Recycle Bin is in the lower right hand corner of my screen.”
They must throw some raging office parties.
@ChrissyOne –
Maybe – just maybe – Mendelson (doesn’t he do some sort of classical music thing too?) ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” /> is so used to granite, hammer and chisel that going from the stone age to the brushed metal age threw him for a for a loop!
@harryeddy!!! Mellel is the BEST!!! I have used it since – well the stone age… ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” />
Cheers!
BTW, Mendelson’s article is quite good. Very positive about OS X.V ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />
About the alleged eye candy.
I remember when Japanese cars first came on the market in the US. The dashboards were hilarious. There was one of each type of switch: here a rocker switch, there a toggle switch, over there a push-pull switch, and somewhere else one that you had to twist. It wasn’t that the car was designed by a committee, it looked like they didn’t even have a committee!
Well, that is what Vista’s user interface looks like.It looks like they hired a geek to be an interior designer, and the interface is inconsistent. They don’t even have one type of icon!
Coming from Windows XP with its Playskool interface, or Vista with its geek-with-interior-decorator-aspirations interface, Leopard does indeed look like it has a lot of eye candy. It takes a while for one’s eyes to adjust, particularly if you are still using Windows along with OS X. The illusion of eye candy is caused by the fact that Leopard has a well-designed, self-consistent design that involved actual artists and designers.
After one’s eyes adjust, Leopard looks normal and Windows looks like a rip-off of an old version of KDE.
So give Mr. Mendelson some slack. It takes a while for the eyes to adjust when you walk into the light from the darkness. He’s describing the same phenomenon that his readers will experience when they switch.
jonahan: i guess i’m refering to what you call tabs – the bar for example in excel with the text Sheets… Charts… Word Art…
for me that’s a bunch of vertical screen space i want back – it should toggle on/off with the gallery button in the tool bar
so they have to show off the new feature (something i’ll use once a year probably)
can’t… stop… giggling… mac… just… too… much… fun…
I guess my grad school thesis was not a “long, complicated document”. However, it sure felt like one to me!
One thing that I did not find any equivalent on the Mac is the Visual Basic capability of Excel on the Pee Cee.
I do a lot, and I mean a lot of custom macros and automation in Excel and I just don’t have the same flexibility on any Mac app.
Can someone tell me if there’s an alternative? (the new Office 2008 is now without VB).
I don’t get it…
How is XP better suited for “long, complicated” documents?
Does Leopard CUT YOU OFF after say, 30 pages?
I’d love to use Mail, but I am stuck on Entourage, because Mail cannot save an email as an email…#$@!!@
…that is Mail cannot save an email as an email…
can someone here explain to me why?
“Give the guy some kudos instead of criticism.”
Now Spark, I KNOW you are not new here!
” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” />
@labdj
The author was referring to how bad the Mac version of MS Office is compared to the Windows version; there are simply things that can be done in the Windows version that cannot be done in the Mac version. This is true. MS refuses to provide parity to the Mac version; can you imagine how many switchers there’d be if the most critical Windows app performed the same on the Mac?
The author was, IMO, criticizing MS for its piss poor Mac Office Suite then he was dissing Leopard.
I’ve done some serious writing in WORD for Mac and after several hours of editing a 200-300 page document the program would unexpectedly crash saying that it had run out of memory. Got 2 GB RAM in there. Anyhow, I had to chop up the book into five different sections. Annoying. I just can’t justify spending more money for a different program, though. Maybe when I sell this PB G4, though she’s still going strong.