iPhone delay hoax briefly sinks Apple stock by $4 billion

Apple Store“Yesterday, tech blog Engadget received supposed insider information about a delay of the iPhone until October, and another delay for Leopard, pushing the new OS to January of 2008. Duty bound to report to its readers, it filed a post. Within minutes, some people who read the post were selling their Apple stock, which dipped 3% in mid-day trading yesterday. The origin of the information was an internal Apple memo…which turned out to be fake. Fake or not, Apple’s market capitalization sunk by $4 billion once the memo became public,” Eric Zeman blogs for InformationWeek.

“Some are crying for an SEC investigation. According to a Business 2.0 blog, one shareholder sold 5 million shares within 10 to 15 minutes of seeing the post,” Zeman reports.

“Luckily, the turmoil was brief. The stock recovered most of its value by the end of the day (it closed down 0.17%). There are still a lot of questions that remain unanswered. Who really sent the memo? How did they do it from within the Apple system? Did they hack in? We can only assume that Apple is hunting down the responsible party and will take appropriate action once that person is found,” Zeman writes.

“What are bloggers to do, however, when fed erroneous information that looks real? Their gut instinct is to post first, question later. Lessons learned in Journalism 101, however, would have prevented the debacle. It never hurts to pick up the phone and call a company rep to confirm the validity of the information. Will this delay the story? Sure. But in the end, accuracy is more important than being the first to report a story,” Zeman writes.

Full article here.

46 Comments

  1. Y’all should read the comments posted on Engadget for this story. Frakkin’ hilarious. All the Mac-haters had a field day about “Fanboys” and how this would shut them up. Etc, etc., etc. Frakkin’ morons.

  2. “What are bloggers to do, however, when fed erroneous information that looks real? Their gut instinct is to post first, question later. Lessons learned in Journalism 101, however, would have prevented the debacle. It never hurts to pick up the phone and call a company rep to confirm the validity of the information.” —MDN

    It “never hurts” to pick up the phone???!!! I would express it differently: It is the solemn responsibility of anyone who publishes information for public consumption to verify their information before publishing!

    Every blogger in the universe now wants the same priviledges that real journalists enjoy. Fine, let them start acting like real journalists!

  3. I posted this same thing on the Information Week site. Engadget made a huge mistake yesterday.

    First, this “trusted source” obviously cannot be very high in Apple’s organization as anyone with that stature would have known the email was fake. Sorry, Engadget, but having some guy in the mail room shovel you emails just isn’t good enough. At least not with information this critical.

    Second, you don’t publish a story saying Apple put out a press release without there being, you know, a press release.

    Third, a rush to be first has its downsides, too, and Engadget must take responsibility for that. Live by the rushed story, die by the rushed story. I have no sympathy for them.

    Finally, as others have stated, bloggers piss and moan about being “journalists”, so Engadget should be held to that standard.

  4. @ No Squirt

    Thanx for the link … the article was ok… (till they mentioned Enderle) but some of the comments were entertaining .. especially the one from the guy who said that the reason he would never switch to a Mac … was because of the “Mac Fanbois” …
    Talk about ignorance ! ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”LOL” style=”border:0;” />

  5. “It is the solemn responsibility of anyone who publishes information for public consumption to verify their information before publishing!”

    Please cc that to REUTERS, only applies to non anti-american stories though.

  6. It is unfortunate that Engadget didn’t check the validity of the story before posting it.

    When bloggers have been sued to reveal sources, they have invoked the First Amendment and, after battles, won the right to call themselves journalists.

    However, if you want to be a journalist, then you need to act responsibly.

    Next time there a blogger is dragged into the courts and claims First Amendment rights, you can bet that this incident will be cited as a reason that blogs are not news publications and bloggers are not journalists.

    Thanks, Engadget, for giving blogers a big black eye.

  7. textbook….

    iPhone delay hoax briefly sinks Apple stock by $4 billion
    Thursday, May 17, 2007 – 10:24 AM EDT

    Fidelity and Wellington increase stakes in Apple Inc.
    Thursday, May 17, 2007 – 05:19 PM EDT
    Fidelity Investments, the world’s largest mutual-fund company…

    just more proof that investment firms are stupid, reactive NOT proactive, and DIRTY UNDERHANDED %@#& %!*^$

    MDN magic word : expected

    time to ride the wave.. BUY! BUY! BUY!

  8. Journalist have been doing it for years and engadget was right to post it, they had insiders telling them it was right and apple didn’t get back to them on time so lesson is better to apologies than to ask for permission.

  9. @ DogGone: Uh, yes, I have looked at Apple stock for quite a number of years. And I know it’s volatile. But 5% at $108 seemed reasonable. You know, 5% is the new 10%. I took my lumps, I just needed to complain a little about a rumor messing with my portfolio. I know you’ve heard it before, but I actually did start this ride at $13.02 for some of my shares. And I did the old, sell when it’s up several dollars over a week or so, and buy back when it drops a few dollars, picking up four or five shares each time. I’m happy with it, and I even bit the bullet this time and bought back at $108. Now I’ve made back about half of the amount I lost on that flip, but I’m confident it is going much higher still.

  10. I’ve posted a poll at my site with some mildly entertaining, yet
    sadly, possibly realistic options. Feel free to drop in and vote.
    Can’t vote in this forum, but poll set up at edf, here it is.

    Enjoy!

    http://www.everydayfinance.blogspot.com

    AAPLE News – How bad do you think the Fallout will be from
    TheStreet.com’s errant report on the iPhone shortage and subsequent
    tumble in Apple shares?

    There will be no fallout whatsoever. Cramer’s antics and his blogs
    partake in rumors, pump/dump and speculation. I would expect nothing
    less.
    There will be a mild reaction. TheStreet.com doesn’t have real
    credibility to begin with, so this is a just a blip on the Radar
    screen
    There will be massive repraisals; Cramer will issue an official
    apology, new controls and procedures will be implemented at
    TheStreet.com
    The SEC will investigate. Politicians will pounce on the opportunity
    to attack another “rich guy” catering to “rich people” who trade
    stocks and invoke legislation in an attempt to avoid a repeat, messing
    with the 1st amendment and their usual antics

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.