Music labels to ask Apple to add subscription service to iTunes Store

Apple Store“The world’s biggest music companies are expected to ask Apple to introduce a music subscription service to its iTunes digital media store as part of negotiations to renew their agreements with the computer company,” Joshua Chaffin reports for MarketWatch.

Chaffin reports, “Those discussions will begin in earnest next week when Universal Music, the largest record company, sits down at the bargaining table with Apple. Universal’s competitors, Sony-BMG, Warner Music and EMI, have either commenced talks with Apple already or are poised to do so, according to people close to the matter.”

“Executives at Universal and other labels believe a subscription service could prove more lucrative for them than iTunes’ prevailing model of charging consumers 99 cents per track because it would increase consumption of music. It would also entitle the labels to a share of monthly payments, in addition to small licensing fees each time their songs are played,” Chaffin reports.

Full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Another Irish Dude” for the heads up.]

MacDailyNews Take: Business models that fly in the face of human nature are doomed to failure.

Human beings like to listen to favorite songs over and over. They like to own these songs, so that they can play them over and over. They do not want to pay someone an unending monthly rate in order to be allowed to hear their favorite songs.

1,000 excellent songs costs $990 (or $1290 for DRM-free, higher-quality EMI songs) for life, but to listen to them with a $9.99/month subscription plan for 10 years would cost $1199, for 20 years it’d be $2398, $3597 for 30 years, $4796 for 40 years, and so on – and that’s not even taking inflation into account! That subscription rate is going to increase over time, but once you buy a song, you own it for life at the price at which you purchased it — your deal gets better over time, not worse.

Now, for the limited amount of people for which a music subscription service would be welcome, we say, by all means, Apple should offer it – if it makes business sense (i.e. development and operational costs are less than profit potential).

Regardless of what happens, the fact remains: The labels want subscriptions to succeed because they dream of a recurring revenue stream, not because music consumers desire such a service. We can almost hear the greedy bastards in their music cartel boardrooms, “If only we could get them on subscription plans, if only we could get them on subscription plans…” Dreams of easy cash do not a successful business model make.

One more time: Business models that fly in the face of human nature are doomed to failure.

Now, for TV shows and movies, a subscription service makes perfect sense because it better fits the way people consume those types of content than does outright purchasing. Not to mention, where do you store all of that content that you own, but are only going to watch once or twice? Most people can count that number of movies they’ve watched three or more times on their fingers.

We want to buy our music and subscribe to a TV shows and movies plan via Apple’s iTunes Store.

62 Comments

  1. Would this even be possible? In order to be able to enforce the expiry of music you’d have to build the DRM into iPods so they would stop playing at some point. As far as I know, in general terms, the DRM heavy lifting is done by iTunes and an iPod just kind of assumes that anything loaded by iTunes is valid. I doubt Apple are gonna update all previous versions to accomodate this.

    I have no problems with a subscription service – when used appropriately. There is a lot of music I like for a time but then get sick of and wouldn’t own, I wouldn’t mind being able to keep a supply of all the stuff I like but not enough to own. I think existing subscription models have failed because they’ve been an all or nothing scenario. Plus they’ve been shit services anyway.

  2. Same old, same old. When will the labels learn that this is not what consumers want. I want music that actually shows talent, not some technology scrubbed voice over so that the artist is falsely bestowed with the ability to sing — without the DRM.

    EMI is going the right direction with Apple. I doubt that Apple will go with a subscription — it hasn’t work for the other dozen online companies, it wont work with iPod users either.

    My music is all legal, by the way. I have purchased over $800 worth of music from iTunes in the last three years. The rest of my library is from my cd collection.

  3. So what coule WE as consumers to do help!?

    If nothing, I say give it to em anyways and let them see how quickly it fails. Apple may suffer a loss once their DRM is hacked and people download thousands of titles in a month, strip the DRM, and cancel their subscriptions. Just like what happened to all the other sites with windows drm. Fairplay may not truely be hacked now, but with a subscription service driving the desire to do so, it wouldn’t be long.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.