EMI and The Beatles settle royalty dispute; deal could pave the way for Beatles to join 21st century

Apple Store“The company representing The Beatles has settled a 30 million-pound ($59 million) royalty dispute with EMI Group, in a deal that could finally pave the way for the Liverpool band’s music to go online,” Kate Holton reports for Reuters.

“The announcement follows the settlement in February of another legal dispute — a trademark disagreement between Apple Corps and computer and iPod company Apple Inc. which was also seen as key to putting the group’s music online,” Holton reports.

Holton reports, “The Beatles have been one of the last big acts to hold out from putting their music on the Internet.”

“EMI’s Chief Executive Eric Nicoli told reporters earlier this month he was working on a deal to put the band’s music online but refused to give a time frame,” Holton reports.

Full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Adam W.” for the heads up.]

Related articles:
Neil Aspinall resigns from Apple Corps, The Beatles on the way to Apple’s iTunes Store? – April 10, 2007
CNBC video: Apple CEO Steve Jobs and EMI Group CEO Eric Nicoli – April 02, 2007
Reuters: Apple and EMI announcement not about The Beatles – April 02, 2007
Beatles + iTunes? EMI to hold media event on Monday with special guest, Apple CEO Steve Jobs – April 01, 2007
Music’s online holdouts: The Beatles, Led Zepplin, AC/DC, Garth Brooks, and more – February 16, 2007
Why Apple iTunes Store + The Beatles would be a very big deal – February 06, 2007
Wired News: Apple iPods pre-loaded with music are about to become the new CD – February 06, 2007
NPD’s Crupnick: Beatles-iTunes deal ‘almost certain’ – February 05, 2007
Apple Inc. and The Beatles’ Apple Corps Ltd. enter into new agreement – February 05, 2007
The Beatles to share the love with Apple’s iTunes Store on Valentine’s Day? – January 16, 2007
Apple close to offering Beatles music via iTunes Store – December 05, 2006
Fortune: Apple close to landing exclusive iTunes Store deal with The Beatles – November 27, 2006
The Beatles catalog to be available for download ‘soon’ – November 13, 2006
Apple will do ‘everything we can’ to lure The Beatles to iTunes Music Store – May 10, 2006
Apple Computer beats Beatles in trademark court battle, Beatles plan to appeal – May 08, 2006
Report: Apple vs. Apple judgement to be handed down May 8th – April 28, 2006
Apple Corps confirms plans to offer remastered Beatles songs for downloading, ‘no firm date yet’ – April 13, 2006
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple closing arguments; judge’s ruling due toward end of April – April 05, 2006
Apple vs. Apple likely be in judge’s hands by Wednesday – April 03, 2006
Apple lawyer: ‘Even a moron in a hurry’ can tell difference between iTunes and Beatles’ Apple Corps – March 30, 2006
Apple vs. Apple opening arguments begin in UK High Court – March 29, 2006
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple goes to UK High Court this Wednesday – March 26, 2006
Apple Computer and The Beatles’ AppleCorp should stop fighting in court and work together instead – July 27, 2005
Beatles vs. Apple Computer: outcome is far from a lock for Beatles – September 30, 2004
Apple vs. Apple settlement to result in iTunes Music Store Beatles exclusive? – September 23, 2004
Apple’s iTunes Music Store to land exclusive Beatles deal? – September 20, 2004
Apple vs. Beatles could be solved with fat check and spinning off iTunes from Apple Computer – September 17, 2004
Apple’s settlement with Beatles could be ‘biggest settlement in legal history’ – September 13, 2004
The Beatles to sell songs via Apple iTunes Music Store? – June 09, 2004
Apple loses: Apple v. Beatles to be heard in Britain – April 06, 2004
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple; 1991 agreement allows for ‘data transmission services, even music’ – February 26, 2004
Apple Computer to contest Beatles’ U.K. lawsuit in court today – February 25, 2004
Jobs: Apple vs. Apple ‘could drag on for years – it’s unfortunate because we love the Beatles’ – September 28, 2003
Forbes: Apple vs. Apple; iTunes Music Store just might end up with exclusive Beatles deal – September 12, 2003
Sosumi: more on the Beatles’ lawsuit against Apple Computer, Inc. – September 12, 2003
The Beatles sue Apple Computer over iPod, iTunes – September 12, 2003
The Beatles’ Apple Records could be gearing up for fight with Apple Computer – August 12, 2003
The Beatles gearing up for a fight over Apple’s iTunes Music Store – June 03, 2003


  1. I’m with you, Connor MacBook. The ship has already left the dock for the Beatles, and I don’t pity them one little bit. Nine out of ten “youngsters” buying music today have never heard of them, and we sexagenarians have listened to their stuff ‘way too much to care anymore.

    RIP, Fab Four.

  2. What The Beatles may actually expand their online presence from that one crappy 1960 album recorded with Tony Sheridan? Not that it helps me. I already have a complete Beatles collection.

    I’ll settle for seeing The Fab Faux live this weekend.

    And for the person who’s about the make the obligatory Zepplin comment, Zepplin can’t go online until they figure out all of their proper writing credits.

  3. btw i guarantee if John Lennon was still around he wouldve jumped on the itunes bandwagon ages ago. That guy had amazing vision and was light years ahead of the rest of the band. anyway thats all well known.

  4. @Connor MacBook: I already have a complete Beatles collection, so in that sense I don’t care. However, The Beatles in a span of less than a decade did more to change music than any other group of musicians. The Beatles were the one of first self-contained band that both wrote and played their own songs. The Beatles ruled the pop charts during the 60s. The Beatles pioneered the multi-track recording techniques used by every musician today. The Beatles pioneered the incorporating music from around the world into rock-n-roll. What other author has a song book on the level of Lennon-McCartney? Rodgers-Hammerstein? Boyce-Hart? Holland-Dozier-Holland? John-Taupin? No. No. No. No.

    I’m still trying to figure out what band in the last decade that could even have a fraction of the influence on the recording industry that The Beatles had during the 60s and during their subsequent solo careers.

  5. [B]Damm that was a quick email, I’ve been served to appear for a slander suit in GB

    Disclaimer: the opinions expressed are my own and don’t represent the views or opinions of MDN or anyone else.

    Do they have free speech in Great Britan?

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.