More on Wilkes University’s plan to dump all Windows PCs, replace with superior Apple Macs

Apple Store“Wilkes University announced yesterday that it has pulled the plug on PCs in favor of Macs, saying the move — which actually began last year — will save the Pennsylvania liberal arts college more than $150,000 while still letting students and faculty continue to run Windows applications,” Gregg Keizer reports for Computerworld.

“Touted as one of the first colleges to mandate a campuswide shift from Windows PCs to Macs, the Wilkes-Barre, Pa., school wasn’t a bastion of all things Apple before the decision, said Scott Byers, vice president for finance and the head of campus IT. Macs, in fact, were a minority,” Keizer reports.

Keizer reports, “Rather than take bids from the usual PC suspects (Dell Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co.) as well as Macs, Wilkes decided to go all-Apple because the new Intel-based models and the BootCamp dual-boot software… would let the school reduce the number of machines campuswide… ‘We’ll be able to reduce the number by about 250’ across the campus, said Byers.”

Keizer reports, “The school, which enrolls about 4,000 undergraduate and graduate students, will reduce its inventory from nearly 1,700 computers to around 1,450 after the changeover… He also cited the additional security of Mac OS X, schoolwide access to Apple’s iLife suite, and Apple’s operating system itself as side benefits. ‘It is, well, the superior OS, isn’t it?’ said Byers, who before the switch was a dyed-in-the-wool Windows user.”

Keizer continues, “Although the $1.4 million three-year switch — which started last year with the purchase of approximately 500 Macs — means Wilkes is all-Apple, students are free to choose any operating system, said Byers. ‘There’s no Mac mandate.’ Most of them pick one anyway: ‘This generation seems to prefer Macs,’ he added.”

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Embrace and extinguish. grin

Related articles:
Wilkes University to dump all Windows PCs, replace with Apple Macs – February 22, 2007

Apple Macs can run more software than Windows PCs – October 30, 2006
Apple does it again: New Macbook Pros much cheaper than Dell – October 25, 2006
$399 for Windows Vista Ultimate?! (Hint: Get a Mac) – August 29, 2006
Thurrott pits Apple Mac Pro vs. similarly configured Dell, figures out the Mac is less expensive – August 18, 2006
Dude, you got a Dell? What are you, stupid? Only Apple Macs run both Mac OS X and Windows! – April 05, 2006
Apple Macintosh simply does more and costs less than Windows PCs – February 14, 2006

Network World: Need a new PC for Vista? Switching to Mac may cost less and give you more – March 16, 2007
USA Today on switching: Apple Macs can also be screaming-fast Windows machines – March 15, 2007
BusinessWeek: Microsoft’s Windows Vista is ‘slow and dangerous’ – March 15, 2007
Analyst: Microsoft’s Windows Vista is very good for Apple Mac – March 13, 2007
Windows expert dumps Windows, switches to Apple’s Mac OS X, finds software plentiful – March 12, 2007
InfoWorld: 9,000 people switch to Apple Mac every day (plus testing ‘Embrace and Extinguish’) – February 28, 2007
Netscape founder Marc Andreessen switches to Apple Mac – February 28, 2007
Computerworld: Windows expert dumps Windows, switches to Apple’s Mac OS X – February 08, 2007
Embrace and Extinguish in action: TechIQ’s ‘The VAR Guy’ dumps Windows, switches to Mac OS X – September 25, 2006
Windows sufferer spends six hours trying to ‘upgrade’ to Vista, says: ‘I should’ve bought a Mac’ – February 07, 2007
Windows Vista woes push BBC News editor to regret never having ‘defected’ to Apple Mac – February 06, 2007
Bill Gates unhinged with Apple envy; Microsoft on path to become high profile casualty – February 06, 2007
Apple takes dead aim at Microsoft’s Windows Vista in latest ‘Get a Mac’ ad (with video) – February 06, 2007
Digit: Don’t buy Vista; Microsoft may be driving millions to stick with XP or move to Apple Mac – February 05, 2007
Bill Gates has lost his mind: calls Apple liars, copiers; slams Mac OS X security vs. Windows – February 02, 2007
TIME Magazine: Microsoft’s Windows Vista ‘an embarassment to the good name of American innovation’ – February 02, 2007
Microsoft’s Windows Vista: Five years for a chrome-plated turd – January 30, 2007
Those unfamiliar with Apple’s Mac OS X may be impressed with Windows Vista – January 29, 2007
Digit: ‘Microsoft’s Windows Vista may be the best reason yet to buy an Apple Mac’ – January 29, 2007
Pioneer Press: Windows Vista shows ‘Apple is an innovation engine; Microsoft, not so much’ – January 29, 2007
Windows Vista disappoints, so get a Mac – January 29, 2007
Microsoft emails reveal serious Mac OS X Tiger envy – January 26, 2007
Analyst: Microsoft’s Windows Vista could be an opportunity for Apple – January 26, 2007
CNET Reviews Windows Vista: Is that all? Clunky and not very intuitive vs. Mac OS X; warmed-over XP – January 24, 2007
Mossberg: Microsoft’s Windows Vista offers lesser imitations of Apple’s Mac OS X features – January 18, 2007
Windows Vista disappointment drives longtime ‘Microsoft apologist’ to Apple’s Mac OS X – January 17, 2007
InformationWeek Review: Apple’s Mac OS X shines in comparison with Microsoft’s Windows Vista – January 06, 2007
NY Times’ Pogue reviews Microsoft’s Windows Vista: ‘Looks, Locks, Lacks’ – December 14, 2006
Unlike Microsoft’s Windows Vista, Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard will create no new jobs – December 12, 2006
A Windows expert opts for a Mac life, finds the experience ‘superb’ – December 07, 2006
15-year Windows vet tries Apple Mac: ‘My God! This is amazing!’ – December 04, 2006
Dave Winer: ‘Microsoft isn’t an innovator, and never was – they are always playing catch-up’ – December 01, 2006
Harvard Medical School CIO picks Mac OS X over Linux and Windows – November 30, 2006
A Windows expert opts for a Mac life – November 06, 2006
Microsoft’s Windows Vista is basically Microsoft’s version of Mac OS 9.3 – October 11, 2006
Embrace and Extinguish in action: TechIQ’s ‘The VAR Guy’ dumps Windows, switches to Mac OS X – September 25, 2006
Top Windows developer dumps Microsoft’s ‘pile of crap’ for Apple’s Mac OS X – September 12, 2006
Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard is 64-bit done right, unlike Microsoft’s Windows Vista kludge – August 14, 2006
Microsoft Windows Vista: If you can’t innovate… try to impersonate Apple’s Mac OS X – August 10, 2006
Analyst: Apple’s new Mac OS X Leopard sets new bar, leaves Microsoft’s Vista in the dust – August 08, 2006
Microsoft botches another copy job: Windows Vista Flip3D vs. Apple Mac OS X Exposé – June 26, 2006
Windows Vista rips-off Mac OS X at great hardware cost (and Apple gains in the end) – June 13, 2006
Computerworld: Microsoft Windows Vista a distant second-best to Apple Mac OS X – June 02, 2006
Dude, you got a Dell? What are you, stupid? Only Apple Macs run both Mac OS X and Windows! – April 05, 2006
Defending Windows over Mac a sign of mental illness – December 20, 2003

33 Comments

  1. > He also cited the additional security of Mac OS X, schoolwide access to Apple’s iLife suite, and Apple’s operating system itself as side benefits.

    Those are the “side” benefits? I think those are the MAIN benefits. The fact that Macs can run Windows is the side benefit (if you can call being about to run Windows a “benefit”).

  2. He does point out that most of the students use Macs anyway. I think that that is the key here.

    A lot of older people are not ever going to be open to the change but as they retire and are repaced by youger folks, those younger folks will already be Mac users.

  3. The “main” benefit for Wilkes will be saving $150K because they can buy fewer computers, according to their Finance/IT VP. Not how I pick my computer, but so what? If Apple can be the less expensive option, it will catch on a LOT faster!
    GO APPLE!

  4. What’s going to happen is..

    In a all Mac enviroment, the Windows Macs will have software and OS problems and the Mac OS X Mac’s will not.

    The hardware failure rate is considerably less for Apple hardware than it is for any cheap PC box assembler.

    It’s because Apple makes sure it “just works” and not a cludgen of mixed hardware and software conflicts that one gets on the PC Windows side.

    Also the IT cost will be considerably higher mostly for the poor fools who have to use Windows.

    This is going to show itself in the long run and demonstate once and for all which is the superior OS company. The most cost effective choice.

  5. “‘This generation seems to prefer Macs,’ he added.”

    To me this is the biggest statement he made. These trends take years to begin and don’t just fall off. It began with OS X in 2001 and has gathered steam until today. It is this desire that will continue to drive up Mac sales and market share for years to come.

  6. “This generation seems to prefer Macs,’ he added.”

    Like I said, the war is already over. There is no way that 95% (or even 50%) of today’s kids are gonna grow up to be PC-using sheep like their parents. No way!

  7. “> He also cited the additional security of Mac OS X, schoolwide access to Apple’s iLife suite, and Apple’s operating system itself as side benefits.

    Those are the “side” benefits? I think those are the MAIN benefits. The fact that Macs can run Windows is the side benefit (if you can call being about to run Windows a “benefit”).”

    That’s the way it is in entrenched Windows environments. They are kind of clueless about the inherit benefits of working on Macs. But I’ll accept is decision process if that’s what it takes to go Mac!

  8. Here in Chester (UK) My kids Primary and High schools are infected with windows crap, dirt cheap to buy, high cost to run but spread over three or more years.
    Someone must be blind or getting a big backhander to buy this shite.
    My kids know its crap too.
    One day, one day and it’ll be the kids that drive it.

  9. …..I remember a marauding group of white-collar criminals …they squeezed the planet between their palms while dripping their saliva over North America and Eurasia.
    They owned the world …for them there were no rules, no law, …only greed, avarice and domination whatever the price. There were thefts, lies, ….there was self-aggrandizing and most importantly …ownership.
    They were the mammals …members of my own variety ..the frontal lobes, abstractions, ideals ..we were the group that was supposed to take the high road.
    I’m ashamed to call myself a mammal. I’d prefer to think of them as rats in mammals clothing. I will not subsidize these mammals ..I will not use their code on my computer …I will not support the code of those who support them. They have employed tactics the thought of which makes my ass fuse burn …but I will not explode. I’ll turn my back on their every endeavor.

  10. MDN’s take

    Embrace and extinguish

    Did it for our family, being able to run windows was the security I needed to make the switch, that was last July.

    soon realized I prefer the Mac MS office better (waiting for spredsheet in iWork), and tho I prefer Picasa, have gotten use to iPhoto with a few plug ins.

    Haven’t used windows in months, and do not plan on.

  11. Ok, I’m getting ready to duck, but in the early 90’s with Windows being compared as a bad copy of Apple’s System 6.x these same embrace and extinguish arguments, and young people as they grew up replacing other systems for mac..

    It’s all been said before. Waiting to see it. Fingers Crossed, but PLEASE stop the fecking constant Embrace and Distinguish plugs. Anyone spouting that, like MDN hammers home in every other article, constantly sounds like a idiot. MDN sounds like a radical Muslim website, just the religion here is the Mac (and I’ve been an avid Mac owner since ’89).

  12. “…but PLEASE stop the fecking constant Embrace and Distinguish plugs…

    Actually that was Microsoft’s idea, MDN is just… (well there is a word for it…)

    “Embrace, extend and extinguish,”also known as “Embrace, extend, and exterminate,” is a phrase that the U.S. Department of Justice alleged was used internally by Microsoft to describe their strategy for entering product categories involving widely used standards, extending those standards with proprietary capabilities, and then using those differences to disadvantage its competitors.

    The strategy and phrase “embrace and extend” were first described in a 1996 New York Times article entitled “Microsoft Trying to Dominate the Internet,” in which John Markoff said,

    “Rather than merely embrace and extend the Internet, the company’s critics now fear, Microsoft intends to engulf it.” The phrase was also reported to have appeared in a motivational song by an anonymous Microsoft employee, and in an interview of Steve Ballmer by the New York Times.

    The more widely used variation, “embrace, extend and extinguish,” was first introduced in the United States v. Microsoft antitrust trial when the vice president of Intel, Steven McGeady, testified that Microsoft vice president Paul Maritz used the phrase in a 1995 meeting with Intel to describe Microsoft’s strategy toward Netscape, Java, and the Internet.

    In this context, the phrase means to highlight the final phase of Microsoft’s strategy as raised by McGeady, which was to drive customers away from smaller competitors.

    This is why it’s very important for Mac users not to fund/aid the Redmond beast. It just hurts Mac users in the long run.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.