Bill Gates: Vista is so secure it could run life support systems

At the Vista launch in Romania Bill Gates claimed that Vista, with the right amount of administration could run a life support system:

Journalist: Let’s imagine a hospital where life support systems are running Vista. Would you trust it with your life?

Bill Gates: …Absolutely, Vista is the most secure operating system we’ve ever done, and if it’s administred properly, absolutely, it can be used to run a hospital or any kind of mission crytical thing.

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: The Blue Screen of Actual Death.

Related article:
Microsoft Windows crash nearly causes 800-plane disaster – September 22, 2004

90 Comments

  1. I don’t believe I have ever looked at Doze’s security in this perspective. I would be terrified to put any one I loved on Doze life support. In all seriousness, is there any one on this forum who would want a parent’s life support controlled by Doze? I can’t even joke or be sarcastic about this.

  2. …Absolutely, Vista is the most secure operating system we’ve ever done
    …Absolutely, Vista is the most secure operating system we’ve ever done
    you get it ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” />

  3. A windows pc as long as it is free standing should be fine from a secure stand point If it was hooked to a network and especially on the web that might be a different story but lets face it any system used for life support will have one program on it and thats it it isnt a multi use computer so of course windows 98 would be secure on it even. So the whole thing is really suppose to impress us but if you think about it thats not where the security issues comes into play

  4. I once had a flak jacket made out of Saran Wrap™. I replaced it with one made out of tin foil. That tin foil flak jacket was the most secure flak jacket I’ve ever done….*

    * This is not a true story. It is an analogy that I made up to illustrate what a complete fsck Bill Gates is.

  5. You’ll be fine as long as the doctor can make it through the Life Wizard in time. Cancel your life? Or allow?

    In other news, Bush just had two moles removed from his left temple. One of them may have been been put there by Robert Hanssen.

    That was for you, TowerTone!

    ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”tongue wink” style=”border:0;” />

  6. Security isn’t the only thing required. reliability is the other. Freedom from devastating bugs that could cause a crash, or lockup of the system, is even more important in medical systems.

    XP and earlier OS’s from MS specifically EXCLUDE medical systems, nuclear reactors, etc.

    I wonder if Vista has the same stated limitations. If so, to say that only proper management is required, is a dangerous lie.

  7. A life support computer would not be stand alone. It would be monitored from a central nurses station down the hall or in another part of the hospital wing. Otherwise, how could medical personnel respond to a medical emergency? This all means it is networked and subject to being hacked. Really, really scary.

  8. Gates, “…any kind of mission crytical[sic] thing.”

    What’s with Gates and his “things”? In almost every interview I hear him lamely end comments with this vague reference. He definitely needs a coach.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.