Microsoft’s Windows Vista: Five years for a chrome-plated turd

“Microsoft’s Windows Vista “will launch today with fanfare, parties, hypocrisy, hollow promises and tame reviews. For me, it is something different, it makes me sad. MS will tell you that Vista is the next great thing in every way, it took billions of dollars to develop, millions of man-hours, and undoubtedly will be the best selling OS ever launched. The problem is that Vista brings almost nothing to the table that can’t be described by as three year old as ‘shiny,'” Charlie Demerjian writes for The Inquirer.

Demerjian writes, “Let’s look at it this way, ask yourself what good new features Vista brings to the table. Most will respond that it has Aero Glass, a really pretty UI. How may other things does it bring that are positives? I can’t honestly think of one, and I’ll bet if you ask the next ten people you run into, they won’t be able to tell you any either. Repeat the same exercise in the negative, what bad new things does Vista bring? Massive crushing DRM infections, unacceptable licence terms, bloated hardware requirements, and a list of cut features long enough to paper your bathroom. To be fair, the next ten people you ask probably won’t know that part either.”

MacDailyNews Take: Why do Apple’s Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger’s Aqua GUI features work just fine here on a dusty old 400MHz Blueberry iMac G3 with 192MB of RAM on an ATI Rage 128 graphics card with just 8MB VRAM with a 10GB hard drive with only 400MB free (okay, so Widgets don’t ripple when dropped on the Dashboard, but everything important works), but to run Vista’s Aero GUI it takes at least a 1GHz CPU with a minimum of 1GB RAM with a 40 GB hard drive with at least 15 GB free and a minimum of 128 MB of graphics memory? To run the inefficient and derivative “Flip3D” feature from Vista, it takes that much hardware, but an over 7-year-old iMac G3 we have sitting around can use the superior Mac OS X Exposé with no problem? Just how inefficient is Microsoft’s spaghetti code? Related article: Microsoft botches another copy job: Windows Vista Flip3D vs. Apple Mac OS X Exposé – June 26, 2006

Demerjian continues, “If this is all the billions, man-hours and years brought, what was the point? We get a bloated, DRM infected rights removal tool that advances the state of the art to where Apple was the better part of a decade ago, and we are supposed to call this progress? Puh-leeze.”

“MS is in a rut. The firm has cowered, co-opted or bought all the critics, and any message coming out of the press will be well scripted. Possibly the last big OS ever made is going to be a chrome plated turd, no one has the guts to say it, everyone will pretend it is great because everyone pretends it is great,” Demerjian writes.

Full article, “Vista makes me sad; Five years for a chrome-plated turd,” here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Stoo” for the heads up.]

MacDailyNews Take: Microsoft should be embarrassed and they probably are, but we likely won’t hear about it until the internal emails are released in some court of law 5-10 years down the road.

Related articles:
Those unfamiliar with Apple’s Mac OS X may be impressed with Windows Vista – January 29, 2007
Digit: ‘Microsoft’s Windows Vista may be the best reason yet to buy an Apple Mac’ – January 29, 2007
Pioneer Press: Windows Vista shows ‘Apple is an innovation engine; Microsoft, not so much’ – January 29, 2007
Windows Vista disappoints, so get a Mac – January 29, 2007
Analyst: Microsoft’s Windows Vista could be an opportunity for Apple – January 26, 2007
CNET Reviews Windows Vista: Is that all? Clunky and not very intuitive vs. Mac OS X; warmed-over XP – January 24, 2007
Security firm: 38-percent of malware already Windows Vista-compatible – January 22, 2007
Mossberg: Microsoft’s Windows Vista offers lesser imitations of Apple’s Mac OS X features – January 18, 2007
Windows Vista disappointment drives longtime ‘Microsoft apologist’ to Apple’s Mac OS X – January 17, 2007
InformationWeek Review: Apple’s Mac OS X shines in comparison with Microsoft’s Windows Vista – January 06, 2007
NY Times’ Pogue reviews Microsoft’s Windows Vista: ‘Looks, Locks, Lacks’ – December 14, 2006
Forbes: Microsoft Windows Vista boss suffers from Mac envy – December 12, 2006
Windows chief Allchin 2004 email: I’d buy a Mac if I didn’t work for Microsoft – December 11, 2006
Unlike Microsoft’s Windows Vista, Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard will create no new jobs – December 12, 2006
15-year Windows vet tries Apple Mac: ‘My God! This is amazing!’ – December 04, 2006
Microsoft’s Windows Vista: obsolete on arrival? – December 04, 2006
InformationWeek: Now that Vista is the past, let’s look at the future: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard – December 02, 2006
Microsoft’s Windows Vista and Office 2007 releases generate yawns – December 02, 2006
Dave Winer: ‘Microsoft isn’t an innovator, and never was – they are always playing catch-up’ – December 01, 2006
Harvard Medical School CIO picks Mac OS X over Linux and Windows – November 30, 2006
Microsoft’s Windows Vista vulnerable to malware from 2004 – November 30, 2006
Microsoft Windows Vista developers used Apple Macs for inspiration – November 27, 2006
Apple Macs can run more software than Windows PCs – October 30, 2006
Microsoft’s Windows Vista is basically Microsoft’s version of Mac OS 9.3 – October 11, 2006
Top Windows developer dumps Microsoft’s ‘pile of crap’ for Apple’s Mac OS X – September 12, 2006
$399 for Windows Vista Ultimate?! (Hint: Get a Mac) – August 29, 2006
Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard is 64-bit done right, unlike Microsoft’s Windows Vista kludge – August 14, 2006
Microsoft Windows Vista: If you can’t innovate… try to impersonate Apple’s Mac OS X – August 10, 2006
Analyst: Apple’s new Mac OS X Leopard sets new bar, leaves Microsoft’s Vista in the dust – August 08, 2006
Microsoft botches another copy job: Windows Vista Flip3D vs. Apple Mac OS X Exposé – June 26, 2006
Windows Vista rips-off Mac OS X at great hardware cost (and Apple gains in the end) – June 13, 2006
Computerworld: Microsoft Windows Vista a distant second-best to Apple Mac OS X – June 02, 2006
Thurrott: Microsoft going to get eaten alive over Windows Vista’s resemblance to Apple’s Mac OS X – March 09, 2006
NY Times’ Pogue on Gates’ CES demo: Most of Vista features unadulterated ripoffs from Apple Mac OS X – January 05, 2006
Thurrott: many of Windows Vista’s upcoming features appeared first in Apple’s Mac OS X – September 26, 2005
PC World: Microsoft innovation – an oxymoron – September 14, 2005

Dude, you got a Dell? What are you, stupid? Only Apple Macs run both Mac OS X and Windows! – April 05, 2006

50 Comments

  1. @IT2

    you gotta get up early in the morning to beat me bro. I’m at 27 switchers and counting since the release of Bootcamp. I’ve got 10 more coming this next month – my credit union board of trustees. They were actually paying about $400 a month to set up an audio conference call between 8 people. I was in doing a deposit last Oct, sat down at the table to balance my checkbook on the ibook, and my daughter video chatted me on iChat. The manager saw this, came over, FREAKED OUT at the technology and that started the ball rolling. Once he learned about boot camp and parallels, he got weak at the knees! lol.

  2. “Saw Gates on CNN,

    Miles was pretty good, said it looks alot like OS10,

    Gates went on about the inovation that is far ahead of Apple,

    like

    ” the first OS to have Parental controls”

    “Most advanced OS ever” “

    How can he get away with such bold-faced lies on national TV??? Can’t some one challenge him?

  3. What do you make of the manner in which Microsoft has ushered in the release of Vista? Excerpt taken from PC World article:

    But the event was short on corporate substance and long on glitz. And Office 2007, which was released to consumers alongside Vista today, was scarcely mentioned, as entertainment was more of a focus of the event than software.

    The event they’re referring to, was the superficial New York launch on Monday, whereby ballmer and gates compared the impact of Vista’s release to Windows 95. In comparison, the ’95 release was a huge mega-attraction and the PC world rejoiced.

    Windows 95 had also been five years in development since the introduction of Windows 3.0 and by comparison there was much reason to celebrate, given the advancements of ’95 over 3.0.

    Also interesting is Microsoft used a secondary marketing firm rather than their main or primary PR firm to promote the Vista event which to me implies Vista wasn’t worth the effort.

    A mediocre celebration for a mediocre product. No offense to Edleman.

  4. Seems to me that Flip3D is an “intended copy” of Time Machine. Funny thing is that M$ didn’t quite understand what they were copying. Right Idea, wrong function.
    WHAT A JOKE. LMAO

    Apple makes software with purpose. Simplicity drives the user interface.

  5. The even bigger joke is the system requirements of this turd. Not to mention the 14 (if you count 64 bit) different versions of the software. Check it out here.

    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/919183

    Notice that Vista Basic has different requirements. That is because its the default OS that comes with your new PC or you buy in the store for under $100 as Bill put it and is crippled (less features than XP for the same price) and designed to bait and switch you to downloading the better features from their web site that your system probably can’t support.

    As an IT Professional, I am both laughing at M$ and sad that this POS is such a HUGE dissapointment.

    And Yes. I have Used Vista (Ultimate Edition NOT BETA) since they released to businesses. All I can say is this…. IT BLOWS.

  6. wow 14 versions? 14 versions? jesus christ, why can apple make ONE version of their software that runs on macines that are 7years old and modern ones and MS can’t get this right?

    why do they need to confuse people so much, keep it simple stupid. i guess their philosophy is that with so many versions it gives people the illusion that they are gettiung a piece of software specifically designed for their hardware, and to then point them in the direction of upgrading.

    greedy pricks, dirty, slimy, lying, assholes. sorry to not elevate the discourse, but jesus!

  7. i’m glad i run a mac… have since 90. Hate windows.

    that said, it’s unfair to say: ” Why do Apple’s Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger’s Aqua GUI features work just fine here on a dusty old 400MHz Blueberry iMac G3 with 192MB of RAM on an ATI Rage 128 graphics card with just 8MB VRAM with a 10GB hard drive with only 400MB free (okay, so Widgets don’t ripple when dropped on the Dashboard, but everything important works), but to run Vista’s Aero GUI it takes at least a 1GHz CPU with a minimum of 1GB RAM with a 40 GB hard drive with at least 15 GB free and a minimum of 128 MB of graphics memory?”

    quartz extreme doesn’t run on that. and more over. just cause you can run OS X on that computer, doesn’t mean that it’s the most engaging computer experience.

    OS X is better than vista. we get it. no need to be unclassy by splitting hairs.

    part of the fun of being a mac user is having the class. don’t ruin that with half truths and partial lies.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.