Will Steve Jobs release Mac OS X for any old Intel PC?

“It seems that the company that makes Parallels is working on an upgrade to the software that will let Windows users theoretically run Mac OS X side-by-side with Windows on their cheapo Dell boxes, which Dell would be happy to do. Heresy! The only problem with that, as the article and others are more than happy to point out, is that Steve Jobs likes that idea about as much as Bill Gates likes the idea of open-sourcing Windows code,” Mathew Ingram writes for WebProNews.

Ingram writes, “Obviously… part of the Mac OS experience comes from the fact that software and hardware are all one harmonious whole, working flawlessly together, etc., etc. But why not let people who can’t afford those gleaming white boxes get a taste of the Mac magic?”

Full article here.
Because a Mac that doesn’t work harmoniously isn’t magic.

Why give people a potentially bad taste of something when Apple already offers the great taste of Mac?

Our advice to HP, Dell, etc. owners: eBay, craigslist, etc. Or, if you can afford it, put the thing out of its misery in an environmentally safe manner and spare the next guy the trouble: The Apple Recycling Program. allows for you to purchase any qualifying Apple computer or monitor and receive free recycling of your old computer and monitor — regardless of manufacturer. Then get a Mac. If you’re on a budget, Apple Certified Refurbished Macs often offer good bargains – keep looking, the deals change often. So, no biggie, you made a mistake that’s easily fixed. You can thank us later as untold numbers of Windows to Mac switchers already have.

Related articles:
Windows Vista disappointment drives longtime ‘Microsoft apologist’ to Apple’s Mac OS X – January 17, 2007
InformationWeek Review: Apple’s Mac OS X shines in comparison with Microsoft’s Windows Vista – January 06, 2007
NY Times’ Pogue reviews Microsoft’s Windows Vista: ‘Looks, Locks, Lacks’ – December 14, 2006
Forbes: Microsoft Windows Vista boss suffers from Mac envy – December 12, 2006
Unlike Microsoft’s Windows Vista, Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard will create no new jobs – December 12, 2006
15-year Windows vet tries Apple Mac: ‘My God! This is amazing!’ – December 04, 2006
Microsoft’s Windows Vista: obsolete on arrival? – December 04, 2006
InformationWeek: Now that Vista is the past, let’s look at the future: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard – December 02, 2006
Microsoft’s Windows Vista and Office 2007 releases generate yawns – December 02, 2006
Dave Winer: ‘Microsoft isn’t an innovator, and never was – they are always playing catch-up’ – December 01, 2006
Harvard Medical School CIO picks Mac OS X over Linux and Windows – November 30, 2006
Microsoft’s Windows Vista vulnerable to malware from 2004 – November 30, 2006
Microsoft Windows Vista developers used Apple Macs for inspiration – November 27, 2006
A Windows expert opts for a Mac life – November 06, 2006
Microsoft’s Windows Vista is basically Microsoft’s version of Mac OS 9.3 – October 11, 2006
Embrace and Extinguish in action: TechIQ’s ‘The VAR Guy’ dumps Windows, switches to Mac OS X – September 25, 2006
Top Windows developer dumps Microsoft’s ‘pile of crap’ for Apple’s Mac OS X – September 12, 2006
$399 for Windows Vista Ultimate?! (Hint: Get a Mac) – August 29, 2006
Microsoft Windows Vista: If you can’t innovate… try to impersonate Apple’s Mac OS X – August 10, 2006
Analyst: Apple’s new Mac OS X Leopard sets new bar, leaves Microsoft’s Vista in the dust – August 08, 2006
Microsoft botches another copy job: Windows Vista Flip3D vs. Apple Mac OS X Exposé – June 26, 2006
Sydney Morning Herald Tech columnist dumps Microsoft Windows, switches to Apple Mac – June 13, 2006
Windows Vista rips-off Mac OS X at great hardware cost (and Apple gains in the end) – June 13, 2006
Computerworld: Microsoft Windows Vista a distant second-best to Apple Mac OS X – June 02, 2006
Thurrott: Microsoft going to get eaten alive over Windows Vista’s resemblance to Apple’s Mac OS X – March 09, 2006
NY Times’ Pogue on Gates’ CES demo: Most of Vista features unadulterated ripoffs from Apple Mac OS X – January 05, 2006
Analyst: Windows Vista may still impress many consumers because they have not seen Apple’s Mac OS X – January 05, 2006
Apple’s talent and innovation vs. Microsoft’s hype – October 25, 2005
Microsoft’s Windows Vista strives to deliver what Apple’s Mac OS X already offers – October 10, 2005
Thurrott: many of Windows Vista’s upcoming features appeared first in Apple’s Mac OS X – September 26, 2005
Microsoft’s Ballmer: It’s true, some of Windows Vista’s features are ‘kissing cousins’ to Mac OS X – September 18, 2005
PC World: Microsoft innovation – an oxymoron – September 14, 2005
As usual, Apple leads, Microsoft tries to follow – June 02, 2005
Bye-Bye Bill: another columnist dumps Windows for Apple Macintosh – January 20, 2005
Orlando Sentinel writer dumps Windows for Mac and writes ‘God bless Apple’ – January 16, 2005
IBM Fellow dumps Microsoft Windows XP, switches to Apple’s Mac OS X – September 02, 2004


  1. “Will Steve Jobs release Mac OS X for any old Intel PC?”


    Also, who cares if Dell, et al. wants to sell it, unless they get permission from Apple they won’t be able to sell it.

    Besides, since Apple’s systems cost as much as (and sometimes less than) Dell’s or HP’s, why would you buy the other?

  2. I hope OS X is never licensed to run on peecees. MDN’s take is correct. There is no doubt OS X is better thought-out than doze, but to me there is also no doubt compatibility problems would be ten-fold on dozers. There’s plenty of Macs that have problems with something as simple as a point upgrade-why add more problems with the Ballmer special”?

  3. Ingram is a low-brow tool. Normally he writes for the Globe, and never gets anything Apple-related right. He says “Mac magic” because its become fashionable in the traditional IT world to praise OS X, with the addendum, of course, that if only Apple were more like Microsoft. Ingram has jumped on that bandwagon. He’s probably never actually used OS X in his life, though.

  4. One of the reasons the OS X Mac experience is so flawless is that Apple controls the hardware and software. Windows PC users have to deal with all sorts of hardware and driver problems.

    Parallels runs on a virtual machine, meaning that OS X could run on a “virtual Core Solo” on a Core Duo Dell machine. It would not have all the benefits of running a mac, but it is a lot better than just licensing OS X to Dell.

    It would be Parallel’s duty to make sure their “virtual mac” works well with everyone’s PC hardware.

  5. The idiot who said this at Parallels won’t have to be on the huge team who would have to deal with all the aftereffects, complications and long term issues that OS X on Win$in would create. Sure, it would put some money into Apple’s pocket, but it would take their focus off of what they do best and create compatibility headaches that are undreamable. Steve has known this from the very beginning and people forget that even with the iPod, Apple makes its money on hardware, not software. Apple will never open itself up to a cheap conglomeration of diverse third party hardware. At Apple, going to work is about changing the planet and history. At M$, going to work is about padding their wallet and fixing all their problems. People still compare an innovation company with abunch of businessmen who have more money than they could ever spend. Jobs will leave this life with true satisfaction. Balmer will leave this life with abunch of money he can’t take with him and have his last thought about all the weight of problems and unlined ducks.

  6. Emotionally driven Lord Steven Jobs lemmings are making it absolutely impossible for OSX to ever run on more than 5% of the personal computers in the United States and half that world wide.

    So, quitsherwhining about how 95% of us aren’t now and never will switch. Either give us OSX on a machine that is competitively priced or shut the hell up. Who needs you?

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.