Analyst: ‘iPhone’s willful disregard of global handset market will come back to haunt Apple’

“Much has been said about Apple’s first phone — most of it tainted with feverish hyperbole,” Tero Kuittinen writes for RealMoney.com.

 
“But a week after the grand announcement, it is striking how limited the device seems at a second glance,” Kuittinen writes. “The iPhone’s willful disregard of the global handset market will come back to haunt Apple.”

 

MacDailyNews Take: What part of Steve Jobs’ following statements from his Macworld Expo iPhone introduction does Kuittinen not understand?

iPhone is a Quad-band GSM + EDGE phone. We have decided to go with the most popular international standard which is GSM. We’re on that bandwagon; headed on that roadmap and plan to make 3G phones and all sorts of other amazing things in the future… We’re going to be shipping in in June in the U.S. We’re going to Europe, hopefully, by the fourth calendar quarter of this year and Asia in 2008. – Apple CEO Steve Jobs

So, where’s Kuittinen’s proof of Apple’s “willful disregard of the global handset market?” Answer: he has none.

Kuittinen continues, “While the price revolution of 2006 redefined the smart-phone market in Europe and Asia, several major markets have simultaneously made a decisive transition to 3G. Practically every new smart-phone features third-generation technology, and operators have all but stopped subsidizing high-end phones that do not support 3G. Instead, subsidies in Europe and Asia are geared toward phones with keypads (so people will send as many text messages as possible) and two cameras (so that they’ll engage in video calls).”

MacDailyNews Take: Again, why does Kuittinen continue on with the false premise that Apple will not be releasing a 3G iPhone in markets that support 3G well? And, how did Kuittinen miss the iPhone’s keyboard and SMS features?

Kuittinen continues, “Jobs seems to have gone out of his way to demonstrate his contempt toward mobile operators and their acute concern for 3G revenue generation. And he did this with a $700 platinum turkey of a phone. Without heavy subsidies to push the price below $400, its chances of success in Europe and Asia are slim indeed.”

MacDailyNews Take: Yet again, no proof that the iPhone won’t support 3G in Europe and Asia or that the iPhone carriers won’t subsidize. The iPhone does not cost $700, either.

Kuittinen continues, “There’s a certain type of Northern Californian tech expert who has never seen a successful high-end consumer technology product that failed to hit it big in America, and he can’t grasp that the rest of the world is a very different market. This affliction seems to plague Apple executives… What is the common theme regarding the key specification decisions made for the Apple phone? California. There is no decent W-CDMA network coverage in California, so 3G support may seem superfluous from a regional point of view. Plus, the lack of a keypad may not be a problem for people who have never used a smart phone and may not be heavy text-messagers.”

MacDailyNews Take: You have to be a certain type of moron to think Apple will launch the exact same iPhone showed in January 2007 in Europe in fourth quarter 2007 and Asia in 2008 while not being able to grasp that there’s no proof that Apple would do such a thing, especially after Apple’s CEO said as much during the product’s high-profile introduction.

Full article here.

Related articles:
The massive FUD campaign against Apple’s iPhone ramps up – January 10, 2007

Apple could potentially sell 30 million iPhones in 2007 – January 18, 2007
Reactions to iPhone highlight competitors’ inability to understand Apple’s success – January 17, 2007
ZDNet online poll shows overwhelming Apple iPhone lust – January 17, 2007
Apple iPhone tops Amazon’s bestselling electronics list in Germany – January 13, 2007
BusinessWeek explores ‘the real genius of Apple’s iPhone’ – January 12, 2007
Wired News: Steve Jobs’ iPhone shows the future – January 12, 2007
Cringely: Apple iPhone will suddenly go 3G, gain features, and be renamed ‘Apple Phone’ – January 12, 2007
Apple’s Phil Schiller gives CBS News hands-on tour of iPhone – January 12, 2007
20 unanswered questions about Apple’s iPhone – January 11, 2007
Report: iPhone could be upgraded to 3G with software update if Apple wishes – January 11, 2007
Report: Rogers Communications to offer Apple iPhone in Canada – January 11, 2007
David Pogue: hands on preview of Apple’s iPhone, ‘gorgeous and so packed with possibilities’ – January 11, 2007
PC Magazine hands-on test of Apple iPhone: multi-touch UI ‘takes the breath away’ – January 11, 2007
Mossberg’s initial take on Apple iPhone: ‘radical and gorgeous’ with ‘brilliant new user interface’ – January 11, 2007
NewsWeek’s Levy interviews Apple CEO Steve Jobs about iPhone – January 11, 2007
Why Apple’s iPhone doesn’t do high-speed mobile phone networks (yet) – January 11, 2007
RealMoney: Apple just blew up the whole damn mobile-phone supply chain with its new iPhone – January 11, 2007
ZDNet: Hands on with Apple’s iPhone: ‘elegant, ravishing, simple, sleek; impeccable & intuitive UI’ – January 11, 2007
Apple iPhone FUD campaign begins – January 10, 2007
Nine ways Apple changed the face of consumer electronics yesterday – January 10, 2007
Analysts and investors applaud arrival of Apple iPhone – January 10, 2007
Top 10 things to love and top 10 things to hate about the Apple iPhone – January 10, 2007
How Apple kept the iPhone top secret for 30 months – January 10, 2007
Hands-on with Apple’s iPhone – January 10, 2007
The only thing really wrong with Apple’s iPhone is its name – January 09, 2007
Is Apple building ‘The Device?’ [revisited] – January 09, 2007
Analyst Bajarin: Apple’s iPhone and Apple TV are industry game changers – January 09, 2007
Time: ‘iPhone could crush cell phone market pitilessly beneath the weight of its own superiority’ – January 09, 2007
Analyst: Apple iPhone should be given its own category – ‘brilliantphone’ – January 09, 2007
Cingular to use Synchronoss Technologies’ platform for Apple iPhone – January 09, 2007
iPhone photos from Apple’s Macworld Expo booth – January 09, 2007
Enderle: Apple’s iPhone is going to do very well – January 09, 2007
Apple debuts iPhone: touchscreen mobile phone + widescreen iPod + Internet communicator – January 09, 2007
Analyzing Apple’s iPhone market potential – January 15, 2007

Microsoft CEO Ballmer laughs at Apple iPhone – January 17, 2007
Street Insight: Apple iPhone faces a number of potential obstacles – January 16, 2007
IDG News Service: ‘Reality might tarnish iPhone’s shine’ – January 16, 2007
The Times: Apple’s brand of corporate hubris is almost always damaging in the long run – January 16, 2007
Hackers ‘salivating’ over Apple’s iPhone – January 15, 2007
Bloomberg writer: Apple iPhone won’t make long-term mark; will only appeal to a few gadget freaks – January 15, 2007
Dvorak on Apple iPhone: ‘I think Apple can do wrong and I think this is it’ – January 13, 2007
USA Today writer: Apple iPhone is an ‘ordinary, average product’ at heart – January 12, 2007
FUD Alert: Analyst – I am pretty skeptical Apple’s iPhone can succeed – January 11, 2007
The massive FUD campaign against Apple’s iPhone ramps up – January 10, 2007
The Register’s Ray: Apple ‘iPhone’ will fail – December 26, 2006
Analyst: Apple iPhone economics aren’t that compelling – December 08, 2006
CNET editor Kanellos: ‘Apple iPhone will largely fail’ – December 07, 2006
Palm CEO laughs off Apple ‘iPhone’ threat – November 20, 2006

62 Comments

  1. i just bought a treo 680 (unlocked) for $400
    these things are selling like crazy

    isnt it also a 2.5 device ?

    what is all this negative press about….same idiots that said Ipod would fail (remember the cies that IPOD stood for “idiots price our devices”)

    also fyi…when IPhone comes out i’m ebay-ing the treo and converting

  2. A lot of iPhone commentators talk as if they saw just one picture of the device and have not watched the keynote or read the tech specs on Apple’s website.

    Kuittinen writes as if a conversation with Steve Ballmer is the only knowledge of the iPhone he has.

  3. in france it is almost certain that the iphone will be 3G from the moment it is released. i’m certain apple are on the right roadmap. i can’t wait to have mine and will quite the service i have now for the one that is offering it should it not be the one i’m on now.

  4. “The iPhone does not cost $700, either.”
    No, it actually costs more. By the time you figure in the price of the required contract, you will end up sending enough to buy a nice laptop that can do way more.
    The price is too high, the features too limited and the tie to Cingular/AT&T unacceptable.

  5. This dude can keep trying to figure out all the features of his Motorola Q, and fumble around in the letters on his blackberry trying to dial phone numbers.. Apple is filling a NEW market not trying to be the same as everyone else so why would this tool think that Apple should make a phone just like everyone else?

  6. What phone is this guy talking about? Can’t be the iPhone so much is wrong in this piece of written crap. This is truly the thing that drives me totally mad and willing to scream. And then idiots such as this moron complain if they receive hate-mails from Mac users.

  7. I think the most unbearable thing about the iPhone not coming out until June of this year.. is that we have to endure an endless stream of bozos speculating about how successful the iPhone will be.

    To these analysts: please raise your hand if you have ever designed and delivered a consumer electronics device that has- internationally (not just northern california!) – dominated it’s market segment.

  8. I can buy 3 blackberry or 2 Treo 700s operating on 3-450k 3g network for the price of 1 iPhone operating at 76k on the 2.5g EDGE network.
    76k is going to be a problem for a browser offering full web pages (anyone remember 90 seconds to pull up a web page on dialup) iPhone will burn up a lot of minutes

    Also no voice rcognition? right now I can send email and dail numbers without even touching my blackberry so buttons vs touchscreen is not even an issue

    Just a thought

  9. This guy OBVIOUSLY doesn’t know the difference between cdma 3G and 3G GSM. not to mention the simple difference between cdma dn GSM.. sad sad sad

    The phone cant have everything, but it doesnt need it (it already does mo’ betta’ than every other phone on the market. anyway dont you want apple to make the iPhone 2.0 next year with even more features??.

  10. I want to know how I get a job as a tech reporter or stock anayst. I desperately want I job where I can go to work and pontificate on stuff I know nothing about and without any facts to back up my opinions.

    Why is it that most of the people posting to MDN are better informed about the technolgy markets (not just Apple) than these supposed “experts” that are actually paid for their opinions and analysis?

  11. “I think the most unbearable thing about the iPhone not coming out until June of this year.. is that we have to endure an endless stream of bozos speculating about how successful the iPhone will be.”

    June is far too long a wait (yeah yeah, don’t give me that FCC crap, I know). It’s very unnerving that we have to put up with this for 5 months. It’s like they never even announced it, like we’re still in December speculating about the mysterious iPhone.

    I hope Apple announces and ships a Multi-touch iPod before then. LG releasing the Prada phone KE850 globally next month sure as fuck doesn’t help.

    http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/18/lgs-ke850-prada-official-iphone-says-wha/

    I can’t tell you how much that phone infuriates me.

  12. Most of these analysts are just jock sniffers. They sit on the sidelines second guessing those who actually accomplish things of worth, but they’ll never have a single creative thought in their entire dull lives.

  13. @ Troy

    Sorry to say, but Rogers has said they are the carriers for iPhone. hit google, I can’t remember where I saw this. Maybe it was yahoo.ca

    But I agree. Rogers in Canada suck balls.

    MW=social…as in MS missed the real social.

  14. Those spreading FUD can be very irritating, but although they hope that they’re demolishing Apple’s chances of success, they actually help Apple in two significant ways.

    The obvious way is because by continuing to talk about it, even in a negative sense, it raises the profile of it, which is what expensive advertising would otherwise have to do.

    The other plus is that they slightly lower user’s expectations of the product. If the only information you got was from Steve Jobs, you’d think that an iPhone could turn water into wine. Because of the FUD, potential customers are half believing that the screen will scratch, it can’t be used for text entry and it has an intrusive DRM. When people actually get to try them for themselves and discover that none of those problems actually happen, then they will be more favourably impressed than they otherwise would.

  15. To Critic: I totally agree. ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”grin” style=”border:0;” />

    To MDN: “You have to be a certain type of moron” Er, no, I think pretty much any type of moron will do and we do seem to get most of those types. LOL

    N.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.