As the anticipation about an Apple iPod/phone hybrid builds with a steady stream of rumors and news stories, a new research study shows that an iPod phone has the potential to be a big hit with consumers.
Among key highlights of the research:
• 16% of Americans aged 12+ (about 40 million) say that an “iPod” phone is a “great idea” for them personally based on a description of its likely features. In comparison, 24% of Americans aged 12+ (or 28% of cell users) own a Motorola phone and Nokia is used by 17%.
• An iPod phone would have the potential to increase Apple’s customer footprint substantially. Currently just over 20% of Americans 12+ (about 50 million) own an Apple product – within 18 months of the introduction of a new iPod phone, Apple’s footprint can increase to over 30% according to forecasts based on the study.
• Who would buy an iPod phone?
– 53% of likely buyers are women and 47% are men, suggesting broad mainstream appeal.
– Their average income is about 10% above the national average.
– The average age of likely buyers is 35, with 40% over the age of 40.
– Sprint/NexTel and T-Mobile customers are more enthusiastic than average.
– African-Americans and Hispanic Americans show above average interest.
• Potential buyers are above average music and movie downloaders, suggesting significant incremental revenue opportunities – for example, 29% of likely iPod phone buyers paid for music in the past month from a site such as iTunes or Napster compared to an average of 12% of the US online population.
• In the research, the iPod image and user experience was a big plus driving appeal. The biggest barrier to an iPod phone was the impact on battery life if used as a phone and an entertainment device. Clearly, the rumored two-battery design would go a long way in addressing this significant perceived limitation.
Between June and October 2006, Digital Life America interviewed nationally representative samples of over 2,600 Americans online and via telephone. The results cited are accurate to ±2.4 points, 19 times out of 20.
http://www.srgnet.com/us/releases.html
Related articles:
Apple ‘iPhone’ could disrupt mobile service distribution channel – December 26, 2006
The Register’s Ray: Apple ‘iPhone’ will fail – December 26, 2006
RUMOR: Second leaked Apple ‘iPhone’ image shows chameleonic trackpad – December 21, 2006
RUMOR: Apple ‘iPhone’ photo leaked? – December 21, 2006
Linksys announces iPhone family of Voice Over IP handheld phones and devices – December 18, 2006
RUMOR: Apple on track with ‘iPhone’ release, no delay – December 16, 2006
Fortune: Steve Jobs’ Apple ‘iPhone’ could upend entire US wireless distribution model – December 15, 2006
RUMOR: Apple ‘iPhone’ may include JAJAH VoIP software – December 15, 2006
RUMOR: Apple ‘iPhone’ details surface as release date grows closer – December 15, 2006
Report: Skyworks selected to supply ‘Front-End Module to Apple’s new iPhone’ – December 15, 2006
Broadcom wins SoC bid in ‘upcoming stealth phone’ coming soon from ‘major consumer device company’ – December 15, 2006
Gizmodo guarantees ‘iPhone’ will be announced on Monday – December 14, 2006
Report: Apple expected to debut ‘iPhone’ – December 14, 2006
Analyst describes Apple ‘iPhone’ featuring metal case in multiple colors with virtual click-wheel – December 14, 2006
UBS analyst: Apple may launch MVNO, serve as own carrier for ‘iPhone’ – December 13, 2006
Apple using ‘iPhone’ as diversion? – December 11, 2006
Apple’s ‘iPhone’ silence drives rumor mill crazy – December 08, 2006
BusinessWeek: Wish List for Apple ‘iPhone’ – December 08, 2006
Analyst: Apple iPhone economics aren’t that compelling – December 08, 2006
CNET editor Kanellos: ‘Apple iPhone will largely fail’ – December 07, 2006
Apple ‘iPhone’ could cause Nokia, Palm, Motorola, and RIM to really start to sweat – December 07, 2006
Apple shares fall as CIBC sees ‘iPhone’ release delayed – December 07, 2006
Analyst expects 16GB flash-based Apple iPod video player, 4-8GB flash-based ‘iPhone’ models – December 07, 2006
Prudential: Apple ‘iPhone’ to sport iPod click wheel; video iPod by Q2 – December 06, 2006
RUMOR: Apple’s smart phone project to feature ‘extensive integration with Mac OS X’ – December 05, 2006
Apple begins ‘iPhone’ production – December 05, 2006
Apple needs to think different about data security for ‘iPhone’ – December 05, 2006
NVIDIA graphics chip for next-gen Apple video iPod delayed? – December 04, 2006
Kevin Rose: Dual-battery Apple ‘iPhone’ coming in January; $249 for 4GB, $449 for 8GB – December 03, 2006
Apple applies for ‘Mobile Me’ trademark – January 11, 2006
yes, we know this already. Let’s just see the damn thing!
If people like the idea of a double battery then surely apple (or anybody) might find it worth their while to stop trying to shrink everything and just use any saved space to put another battery inside. Surely the current iPod is about as thin as it needs to be without some radical change in technologies so why not move away from making things ever smaller and concentrate on packing more into the same space?
“yes, we know this already. Let’s just see the damn thing!”
Words of pointed wisdom!
Yea, let us see the damn thing!
This would be an interesting choice with the ~$200 headset to watch movies with. We’re not talking huge numbers, here, but significant ones – those over-40’s with fat wallets and some corporate influence. The ones who use Blackberries today. The ones who will ask “why not Apple?” when the purchase of new computers is being discussed and come back with an offended “Oh, Really!?” when some short-sighted IT type makes an ignorant excuse.
DLMeyer – the Voice of G.L.Horton’s Stage Page
37.9037% of people are sick of the rumors.
Well it is a known fact that 63.875% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
7 days. Sucks ass. Launch the MacWorld on friday.
I have my own phone design in sleeve, I wanna see how my designs compare to the “Apple Phone”.
Its been seen before, of course, but every time I think of the iPhone (or the eventually name of the darn thing), I have to flip on my youtube to this:
If it is even 10% as cool as that, I’ll buy it.
“• Potential buyers are above average music and movie downloaders, suggesting significant incremental revenue opportunities – for example, 29% of likely iPod phone buyers paid for music in the past month from a site such as iTunes or Napster compared to an average of 12% of the US online population.”
94% of which used iTunes, 2% of which used the dying Napster service.
MDN Keyword “larger” as in you have to love how the media likes to make Apple’s rivals seem “larger” than they are!
Add Some Choice: