WSJ mistake: ‘digital-music sales have stalled for the first time since Apple launched iTunes Store’

“The music industry has long resisted selling music in the MP3 format, which lacks the copy protections that prevent songs from being duplicated endlessly. But now, Blue Note Records and its marquee artist, jazz-pop singer Norah Jones, are selling her latest single through Yahoo Inc. as an MP3 — despite the risk that it may add to piracy problems… Another EMI act, Christian rock band Relient K, also released two MP3s through Yahoo yesterday,” Ethan Smith and Nick Wingfield report for The Wall Street Journal.

“The releases come as some high-tech and music-industry executives are becoming increasingly concerned about Apple’s growing clout in the music business. Only online music files purchased from iTunes, ripped from users’ own CDs or downloaded from pirate services can be played on the popular iPod. Copy-protected songs purchased from Yahoo and other legitimate sources don’t work on it. By selling music in the MP3 format without copy-protection software, Yahoo can offer music that works easily on iPods,” Smith and Wingfield report.

MacDailyNews Note: “Only online music files purchased from iTunes, ripped from users’ own CDs or downloaded from pirate services can be played on the popular iPod.” In other words, “only” all of the recorded music in the world can be played on iPods.

Smith and Wingfield continue, “The MP3 releases are coming as digital-music sales have stalled for the first time since Apple launched its iTunes Store in 2003. Digital track sales held steady at 137 million songs in the second and third quarters of this year, according to Nielsen SoundScan. That’s a slight drop from the 144 million sold in the first quarter.”

The Wall Street Journal provides the graphic seen on the left.

MacDailyNews Note: Digital-music sales have stalled for the first time since Apple launched its iTunes Store in 2003? Wait a second here. Are Smith and Wingfield incapable of basic pattern recognition? According to their own chart, third quarter 2005 showed a dip from the previous quarter – that would be the first so-called “stall.” Third quarter 2006 shows a flat result versus the previous quarter. In both years, the fourth quarter set records. We predict the same for this year. Furthermore, since each individual quarter shows healthy year-over-year increases there is no evidence whatsoever that “digital-music sales have stalled.” Next year, when third quarter again shows the same results, we hope reporters can forget the annual “digital-music sales have stalled” nonsense and look instead at the seasonal patterns that are clearly shown in their own accompanying graphics. Expect to see strong first quarters as Christmas iTunes gift certificates are redeemed mostly during that quarter. Gift certificate sales did not impact iTunes sales strongly until last year.

Smith and Wingfield continue, “For Yahoo, the deal with EMI represents another step in a long-running effort by David Goldberg, the vice president and general manager of Yahoo Music, to persuade recording companies to abandon their insistence on antipiracy software. Mr. Goldberg publicly floated the proposal at a music industry conference in February, but initially found few takers.

“His reasoning: Antipiracy software on music isn’t helping the industry because the same music is already available without copy protection on CDs and through Internet file-sharing programs. What’s more, many consumers don’t like the limitations that copy protection imposes on how and on which devices they can listen to their music. If DRM benefits anyone, Mr. Goldberg argued, it’s technology companies like Apple, because it makes it trickier for consumers that have made hefty purchases of digital music through iTunes to switch to non-Apple music devices in the future,” Smith and Wingfield report.

Smith and Wingfield report, “For music executives, allowing Apple to gain increasing control over digital music sales — iTunes accounts for more than 90% of the tracks sold online some weeks, according to people who work in the music industry — is shaping up as the latest in a long series of strategic blunders that have helped create powerful new gatekeepers between them and their customers. (Past middlemen have included radio broadcasters, MTV and big retailers like Best Buy Co. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc.”

Full article here.
The music industry did not “allow” Apple to gain increasing control over digital music sales. The music industry has deals with all the other online music stores, too. People buy 90% of the tracks sold online from Apple iTunes Store because Apple did it right. Apple took increasing control over digital music sales because, as usual, they made the best solution. Apple earned their market dominance through hard work and keeping the customer experience foremost in mind. We encourage the music labels to sell quality tracks without DRM, as DRM obviously does not work to prohibit music piracy, anyway.

33 Comments

  1. 50-cents per track (about $5 per album) and compelling personalized store features that account for half of that value in the minds of a consumer could make a dent on piracy. And no DRM, of course. DRM is no hindrance to usage/copying at all, just a slight inconvenience.

  2. What REALLY ticks me off is the new WalMart model of DRM that Mac users are starting to accept i.e. buy the DVD and pay extra to play it on ONE PC ONLY and extra still to play it on mobile devices.

    What gives? I just BOUGHT the DVD that I can stick in my DVD player, computer, even take to a friend’s house and play there. I OWN the right to view it personally with the DVD sale – why do I need to pay extra to move it around or play on one or more computers?

    I hope this model NEVER comes into the music industry, otherwise you’ll have to buy a CD linked to only one HiFi system, then pay extra if you want to play it in your car or on your iPod. For this reason I support both the iTMS and MP3 sales.

    Also, I have two teenagers and one preteen. While they receive songs from their friends via MSN all the time, they still expect to pay for it. They make a list and we buy them iTMS gift cards as presents to get it all legally.

    Everyone knows that people who steal music go straight to hell (1 Corinthians 6:10). I have to tell myself “Don’t do it, delete it or go buy it.”

  3. radioalarm–I’m never quite understood the issue people have with using other online download services….burn a cd, rip it back in.

    Actually, you can’t do that with other music services. I tried when I was in the Windows/Creative world. My computer crashed and I lost the licenses for the music I bought, but since I had burned a CD previously of the music, I thought I could rip from the CD and still have my music. Nope, wouldn’t let me play those reripped songs cause I didn’t have a license. Very annoying.

  4. And those uncopy protected MP3’s cost 3 times more than a track from iTunes. $3.50 versus 99 cents from iTunes. I don’t know about anyone else but iTunes works better for me and I can’t see paying 3 times more for the same thing.

    I also think sales of iTunes drop is hogwash and I can’t wait for Steve to announce at Macworld another record sales quarter. These supposed experts claimed that iPod sales would be down last quarter, instead they were up again to new record levels.

    I have a feeling it will be the same with iTunes sales as the christmas shoppers get into gear as we get closer to the 25th.

  5. Okay, where is Zune Tang? Shouldn’t he be here in this room, typing in all caps, holding a cardboard ‘the iPod is doomed’ sign and shaking his weiner at us? Why does he only show up if the MDN article has ‘zune’ in the title? Why isn’t he telling us how awesome the zune’s online music service is?

    I’m starting to think that he works for Microsoft…

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.