The Beatles stream ‘LOVE’ album for free online

The Beatles are inviting Internet users to take part in the “LOVE” global listening event.

The new album “LOVE” will be released on November 20th (21st in the U.S.) and to celebrate, The Beatles are offering everyone the chance to hear the whole album online first. All you have to do to take part is to login using your email address and add your pin to the world map. You will be able to view all the other people who have listened to the album around the world.

The Beatles have also added the exclusive film featuring interviews with Paul, Ringo, Yoko Ono Lennon, Olivia Harrison and Sir George Martin. The film explains how the tracks were re-worked for LOVE – the music and visual collaboration between The Beatles and Cirque du Soleil. Sir George and his son Giles Martin have been working with the entire archive of Beatles recordings to create LOVE – the result is an unprecedented approach to the music of The Beatles.

More info here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Phil” for the heads up.]

Related articles:
The Beatles catalog to be available for download ‘soon’ – November 13, 2006
Apple will do ‘everything we can’ to lure The Beatles to iTunes Music Store – May 10, 2006
Apple Computer beats Beatles in trademark court battle, Beatles plan to appeal – May 08, 2006
Report: Apple vs. Apple judgement to be handed down May 8th – April 28, 2006
Apple Corps confirms plans to offer remastered Beatles songs for downloading, ‘no firm date yet’ – April 13, 2006
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple closing arguments; judge’s ruling due toward end of April – April 05, 2006
Apple vs. Apple likely be in judge’s hands by Wednesday – April 03, 2006
Apple lawyer: ‘Even a moron in a hurry’ can tell difference between iTunes and Beatles’ Apple Corps – March 30, 2006
Apple vs. Apple opening arguments begin in UK High Court – March 29, 2006
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple goes to UK High Court this Wednesday – March 26, 2006
Apple Computer and The Beatles’ AppleCorp should stop fighting in court and work together instead – July 27, 2005
Beatles vs. Apple Computer: outcome is far from a lock for Beatles – September 30, 2004
Apple vs. Apple settlement to result in iTunes Music Store Beatles exclusive? – September 23, 2004
Apple’s iTunes Music Store to land exclusive Beatles deal? – September 20, 2004
Apple vs. Beatles could be solved with fat check and spinning off iTunes from Apple Computer – September 17, 2004
Apple’s settlement with Beatles could be ‘biggest settlement in legal history’ – September 13, 2004
The Beatles to sell songs via Apple iTunes Music Store? – June 09, 2004
Apple loses: Apple v. Beatles to be heard in Britain – April 06, 2004
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple; 1991 agreement allows for ‘data transmission services, even music’ – February 26, 2004
Apple Computer to contest Beatles’ U.K. lawsuit in court today – February 25, 2004
Jobs: Apple vs. Apple ‘could drag on for years – it’s unfortunate because we love the Beatles’ – September 28, 2003
Forbes: Apple vs. Apple; iTunes Music Store just might end up with exclusive Beatles deal – September 12, 2003
Sosumi: more on the Beatles’ lawsuit against Apple Computer, Inc. – September 12, 2003
The Beatles sue Apple Computer over iPod, iTunes – September 12, 2003
The Beatles’ Apple Records could be gearing up for fight with Apple Computer – August 12, 2003
The Beatles gearing up for a fight over Apple’s iTunes Music Store – June 03, 2003

53 Comments

  1. @ Exasperated: Not so. I heard Woz speak in the 80’s. The name came about because one of the two of them, Jobs i think, was working picking Apples for a while. Jobs thought the Apple was nearly the perfect food, and so wanted to name the company after it.

  2. Sosumi – The system sound name pointed directly at the Beatles’ recording company: “Apple”

    The Steve promised The Beatles that HIS Apple would never be involved with audio playinig or recording after they expressed litigious feelings over the name of his company.

  3. Gee theloniusMac, thanks for sharing. That certainly helps me evaluate this news. Or put another way, who do you think gives a rat’s a$$ whether you hate the Beatles or not?

    MW: “often” as in “I often read usless tripe like your post on the Internet.”

  4. FactChecker…

    Your sources are at best, apocraphyl.
    No one is really sure where the name came from.

    “… Because they were going into business, they needed a name for their company. According to Wozniak, it was Jobs who thought up the name for their new computer company one afternoon as the two drove along Highway 85 between Palo Alto and Los Altos.

    “Steve was still half involved with a group of friends who ran the commune-type All-One Farm in Oregon. And he would go up and work there for a few months before returning to the Bay Area. He had just come back from one of his trips and we were driving along and he said ‘I’ve got a great name: Apple Computer.’ Maybe he worked in apple trees. I didn’t even ask. Maybe it had some other meaning to him. Maybe the idea just occurred based upon Apple Records. He had been a musical person, like many technical people are. It might have sounded good partly because of that connotation. I thought instantly, ‘We’re going to have a lot of copyright problems.’ But we didn’t. Both of us tried to think of technical-sounding mixtures of words, like Executek and Matrix Electronics, but after 10 minutes of trying, we both realized we weren’t going to beat Apple Computer.”…”

  5. The actual facts:

    1. Jobs named Apple Computer after The Beatles’ Apple Records.
    You are good. Even Steve Wozniak didn’t really know how Jobs came up with that “fact”:

    “Steve was still half involved with a group of friends who ran the commune-type All-One Farm in Oregon. And he would go up and work there for a few months before returning to the Bay Area. He had just come back from one of his trips and we were driving along and he said ‘I’ve got a great name: Apple Computer.’ Maybe he worked in apple trees. I didn’t even ask. Maybe it had some other meaning to him. Maybe the idea just occurred based upon Apple Records. He had been a musical person, like many technical people are. It might have sounded good partly because of that connotation. I thought instantly, ‘We’re going to have a lot of copyright problems.’ But we didn’t. Both of us tried to think of technical-sounding mixtures of words, like Executek and Matrix Electronics, but after 10 minutes of trying, we both realized we weren’t going to beat Apple Computer.”

    And the first Apple logo actually was a picture of Sir Isaac Newton sitting under an Apple tree.

  6. Poppycock:

    Apparently a couple of you “… gives a rat’s a$$ whether you hate the Beatles or not…” as you posted useless tripe as you say, in response.

    To tell the truth, you might be a bit surprised just how many people have cared how much I detest, no loathe in fact, the nonharmonious, discordant clamor that masquarades as music, coming from the so called Beatles.

  7. >I have always, and will always, hate the Beatles.

    AMEN!

    The only stuff I can stand from them are the cover songs they played during Hamburg days with Stu Sutcliffe, the cool Beatle. Their music was shoved down my throat as a kid and I always cringe when I hear them now.

  8. And I hate puppies, and little kids, and fresh water, and .. and.. you know I’ll think of some more.

    And rocks. Stupid rocks! They’re all dumb as… rocks! Yaah! Who’s with me!?!? ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”raspberry” style=”border:0;” />

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.