Apple’s Mac OS X 10.4.8 runs on any generic x86-based PC – sort of

“Mac OS X 10.4.8 will now run on any generic x86-based PC. Well, almost. Kernel coder Semthex has posted what he claims is an entirely legal release of the Mac operating system’s foundation layer. The only snag: you can’t boot into the familiar GUI,” Tony Smith reports for The Register.

Smith reports, “In any case, the code will boot up into single-user mode, which has a certain interest for Unix and command-line geeks, but isn’t going to get Mac fans rushing off to buy cheap Dells instead of Apple machines.”

Full article with links here.

Related articles:
How Apple protects Mac OS X from having to run on non-Apple hardware – October 24, 2006
Fortune compares Mac vs. Dell: ‘you’ll get more for your money with Apple’ – September 11, 2006
PC box assemblers like Dell and others wish Apple would license Mac OS X – August 31, 2006
$399 for Windows Vista Ultimate?! (Hint: Get a Mac) – August 29, 2006
AP: Time to think different, Apple Mac beats Dell on price, software compatibility, and more – August 23, 2006
Thurrott pits Apple Mac Pro vs. similarly configured Dell, figures out the Mac is less expensive – August 18, 2006
Apple Mac Pro with/ 20” Cinema Display less expensive than Dell Precision 690 sans monitor – August 10, 2006
Bear Stearns: Apple’s new Mac Pro, Xserve pricing well below comparable Dell systems – August 09, 2006
Time Magazine on Apple’s 13-inch MacBook: ‘Dell and HP should be very worried’ – June 07, 2006
Dude, you got a Dell? What are you, stupid? Only Apple Macs run both Mac OS X and Windows! – April 05, 2006
Apple CEO Steve Jobs’ ultimate goal: ‘to take back the computer business from Microsoft’ – June 16, 2005

30 Comments

  1. I could immagine Apple releasing a version of Tiger right after Leopard is released that could be installed on any PC. Give the other 95% a taste of Mac OS X but keep the latest and greatest on Mac hardware only.

  2. “You can buy a Dell for less than a Mac” is still a true statement regardless of the comparisons cited, thus, “cheap Dells” is still a valid description. For many, comparability is irrelevant to the bottom line.

  3. Dan: Doubtful… that would open up a can or worms with compatibility with generic PC peripherals and all those variable setups out there.
    All of a sudden, Mac OS X doesn’t work like it’s supposed to.

  4. Apple doesn’t have to worry about protecting the Mac OS from being installed on a PC. It’s security is built in…PCs aren’t powerful enough to run it. Show me a PC that can run Mac OS and then show me the time machine you used to travel forward into the future to get it.

  5. The idea of a free download of an older OS X or some sort of “trial” version is quite an interesting concept. That would be a fun way to let people try before they buy. Ballmer would be throwin’ chairs for quite a while on that news.

  6. So it boots into single-user mode. That isn’t Mac OSX. Without the GUI and all its features that’s just Unix. Bit like claiming that you can get a car to run without the key, when all you can do is start the engine, but the transmission won’t shift into Drive…

  7. “but isn’t going to get Mac fans rushing off to buy cheap Dells instead of Apple machines.”

    Wait a minute. Apples are now cheaper than Dells. There is even a recent post here on MDN with comparisons. Even if OS X could run on a Dell, what reason is there anymore to purchase one?

    MW: months. Dell only has several months of significance left.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.