Development approaches of Mac OS X Leopard vs. Windows Vista yield very different results

“Two months ago, at least seven months before its scheduled release, Microsoft opened up its new operating system Windows Vista, in the form of Beta 2, for public scrutiny, inviting the public to download, test it and provide feedback to the software company,” Stan Beer writes for iTWire.

Beer writes, “So many millions took up the offer, that Microsoft eventually decided to charge a nominal fee of US$1.50 for downloads.”

“Yesterday, reports started appearing about how a preview version of Mac OS X 10.5 (aka Leopard) is circulating on internet file sharing networks,” Beer writes. “No doubt, some applications developer who was provided with a copy of the Leopard preview for development purposes at the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference has been naughty. Also no doubt, if Apple finds out who was responsible, the company will sue, as is its right, given that all the developers reportedly signed non-disclosure agreements.”

Beer writes, “Regardless of the merits or otherwise of Leopard and Vista, the contrast of the approach to development between the two companies could not be more stark.”

“The results of the two differing processes is in fact quite surprising,” Beer writes. “One would think that the collaborative approach taken by Microsoft would produce a more stable, secure, and bug free product. After all, it has been tested by millions, while the Apple product would have only undergone a fraction of the testing.”

“Without prejudging Vista, it is fairly obvious that Windows XP is not exactly the epitome of stability and security. It would be kind to say that it is no more stable and certainly not more secure than Mac OS X 10.4,” Beer writes. Apple never makes compromises. Its operating system is designed under dictatorial rule. You can either take or leave it but it works and it works well.”

Beer writes, “Unfortunately for Apple, most people seem to prefer to live under the open and imperfect system developed by Microsoft than the rule of dictatorship. Perhaps, Apple’s move to the Intel platform will change that.”

More in the full article here.\

MacDailyNews Take: Mmmmmm, Beer… Most people don’t “prefer” Microsoft Windows; they just don’t know any better. That’s starting to change dramatically right now.

Related MacDailyNews articles:
Microsoft Windows five times more expensive for users than Apple’s Mac OS X – August 15, 2006
How will Apple deal with astounding success? – August 14, 2006
Oxymoron: Microsoft security – August 12, 2006
Computerworld: Microsoft Windows Vista a distant second-best to Apple Mac OS X – June 02, 2006

27 Comments

  1. If Microsoft offered me $10,000 to switch from OSX to Windows, the answer would be an easy ‘no thanks’.

    Even a life-changing number wouldn’t do it for me, if you assume I wasn’t allowed to cheat!

  2. The only thing that would make me switch to Windows would be if Microsoft started putting OS X discs in the box and calling that windows. They’d also have to charge less for it to justify me having the crappy box.

  3. If Microsoft offered me $10,000 to switch from OSX to Windows, the answer would be…

    For as long as there is no time limit I would say YES!!

    So, what would it take for you to switch back

    uhhhhmmm, half an hour after I cashed the check?

  4. I don’t know if it a conscious effort, but Beer almost tries to equate Microsoft’s ‘open-house’ approach to testing (btw, paying $1.50 to MSFT to download a copy of a beta just proves that MSFT have no shame and many MSFT junkies have no sense, but anyhoo…) to open-source development.

    However, the real difference between the companies is that Apple manages to release a new version of OS X every two years based on a development team of around 400, whereas Microsoft does everything it can to prove The Myth Of The Man-Month by throwing several thousand developers at seven different versions of Vista.

    It could be argued that Microsoft’s cluttered, over-engineered, contradictory operating systems are, in some way, a reflection of their cluttered, over-manned, under-managed development teams pursuing contradictory visions – corporate dominance or personal ease-of-use.

    Ignoring who invented what, any company that can burn several billion dollars and hundreds of thousands of man-days on the development of a product that contains so little original imagination has to ask itself whether it is employing the right people either as architects or as developers.

  5. Stan’s argument is weak. He’s dead-on when it comes to the “Mythical Man-Month” aspects of Windows development.

    While I’m definitely of the “You can have my Mac when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers” crowd, portraying Apple as a closed development process and MS as an open one is largely wrong.

    The underlying OS to OS X, BSD Unix, was arguably the first Open Source Unix (though the original Unix from ATT labs was initially distributed as source code, free of charge, soon thereafter ATT started charging exhorbitantly for source code licenses)

    It’s been tested, tweaked, and bulletproofed since the early 80’s. Today BSD and it’s derivatives FreeBSD and NetBSD are widely recognized as very secure unix distributions.

    Apple’s code, on top of the Unix core, is developed in-house, but there are a horde of developers banging on it; Apple has always given pre-release versions of it’s OS software to paid ADC members.

  6. I work in an International community and the amount of people I see everyday who do not know a thing about Mac’s is staggering.

    They see my 17″ PB and want to know, so I show them and still they are not convinced. I cannot get them to change from IE to Firefox on the PC without a fight. They are just stuck in the last century and their own little comfort zones.

    People resist change and the average windoze user is a pretty unexciting individual and it would take a second coming to get most of them off their collective fat arses to even listen to the enlightened, yet alone actually do anything about it.

    Leo

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.