Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard is 64-bit done right, unlike Microsoft’s Windows Vista kludge

“Windows Vista will come in a multitude of flavours: six at the last count. And it’s said that all of these, bar the starter edition, will come with the added 64-bit support needed for modern CPUs – but the 64-bit versions will be completely different installable builds,” Dean Pullen reports for The Inquirer.

“The 64-bit installation will come with a 32-bit emulation layer called WOW (Window on Windows, and nothing to do with orcs and elves) which will, as you can probably guess, allow you to run your old 32-bit apps on your shiny new 64-bit Vista, via emulation. 32-bit hardware drivers will not work,” Pullen reports.

“There will be just one version of workstation-based Leopard (plus an accompanying server edition), and it will come with 64-bit and full non-emulated 32-bit support,” Pullen reports.

Pullen reports, “Starting with Xcode 2.4, the OSX Universal binary format has been extended to support 32-bit and 64-bit for both PPC and Intel processors inside the same file, giving OSX quad universal binaries. Users don’t have to choose between processor architectures nor 32-bit or 64-bit processors, either at the OS or application layers, it’s all abstracted away from them – as it should be.”

“Note that the non-emulated support in OSX is for applications and drivers. 32-bit programs on Vista 64 need to work on WOW emulation to run in Vista, and 32-bit drivers are a no-no. Lack of driver support is the main reason Windows XP x64 hasn’t been widely adopted, and why the Vista fudge will ensure hardware incompatibilities between the two Windows versions remain for sometime to come,” Pullen reports. “This is quite a boon for OSX, and one that should be highlighted frequently and often.”

Full article here.

42 Comments

  1. For people who missed Podcast #51 from Security Now! and don’t have the time or inclination to go and listen to it, another source of fun and enjoyment over the next few years will be the fact that Vista introduces a whole new network stack implementation to replace the (allegedly ‘stolen’ open-source) stack that has run since Windows 2000.

    And, as if that wasn’t a worry in itself, it would appear that whilst they were developing the stack, they forgot to refer to the ‘Previous Mistakes’ file so some recent betas of Vista can be made to fall over by staring at them for 20 seconds and shouting at them.

    The conclusion of the hosts was that, for Vista to be available to corporates by November, it has to go Golden Master in less than 13 weeks and that – given the fact that the network stack is still a mess – either it will be an accident waiting to happen OR it ain’t shipping this year.

    People who come on this site claiming that Windows is every bit as functional as Mac OS X should take note of this story, the text of this MDN article sourced from The Inquirer and the DHS warning from last week. Windows stinks now, and it’s about to get a whole lot worse.

    Smug? You betcha. Cos smug is better than deluded.

  2. I love Sputnik. He (she?) is almost as funny as Ampar. And, yes folks, it is all tongue in cheek, so don’t get your knickers in a twist. Sputnik is the alter ego of a Steve Jobs fanboy.

Add Your Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.