Microsoft to spend hundreds of millions, several years on Zune trying to catch Apple iPod+iTunes

“Microsoft does not expect an immediate return on its outlay for its upcoming ‘Zune’ media player, predicting a three- to five-year investment period for the new device,” Reuters reports.

“‘It is something that is going to take time,’ Robbie Bach, president of Microsoft’s entertainment and devices division, said at Microsoft’s annual analyst meeting. ‘This is not a six-month investment time horizon,’ he said, adding that it may take three, four or five years to succeed,” Reuters reports.

Full article here.
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “BrooklynNYC” for the heads up.]

“The software giant plans to have one music player in the U.S. this year, expanding into other devices and regions next year, [said] Robbie Bach, president of the Entertainment and Devices Division at Microsoft,” Ina Fried reports for CNET News.

“Microsoft confirmed its plans for its Zune-branded player and service last week, but has offered scant details beyond the fact that it will have a hard drive-based music player with a built-in Wi-Fi connection on the market this year,” Fried reports. “The move is a radical departure for the software maker, which has until now tried to take on Apple with a partner approach, in which many devices and services used Microsoft’s technology. Although the devices and services were by and large compatible, the experience hasn’t been what Microsoft hoped.”

Fried reports, “Bach said Microsoft is not abandoning its partner-oriented PlaysForSure program, even as it looks to build its rival Zune approach. ‘PlaysForSure continues as it is today,’ he said, addressing a question from analysts. ‘We’re going to continue to support that,’ he said.”

Full article here.
Are Microsoft really shooting for 20% of the iPod market or are they actually targeting the 20% of the market that iPod currently doesn’t own? We suspect the latter. Regardless, we hope Microsoft spends a lot of money on this. While we don’t see Microsoft’s efforts as much of a threat to iPod+iTunes, we also hope it pushes Apple by providing some measure of real competition that will drive innovation even faster.

For more on why we don’t think Microsoft can “kill” Apple’s iPod+iTunes, please read SteveJack’s take here.

Related articles:
In wake of Zune announcement, should ex-Microsoft ‘partners’ join iPod ecosystem? – July 27, 2006
Zune: Apple cannot lose. Microsoft cannot win. – July 26, 2006
Analyst: Microsoft partners zune to be the biggest losers – July 25, 2006
In wake of Zune, Microsoft ‘partners’ consider abandoning PlaysForSure – July 25, 2006
a href=”http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/10289/”>Wi-Fi seen limiting battery life on Microsoft’s Zune – July 24, 2006
Why Microsoft’s Zune is doomed to fail – July 24, 2006
Bear Stearns analyst expects Apple to respond to Microsoft’s ‘challenge’ with new iPod innovations – July 24, 2006
Microsoft Zune? They should’ve called it the Microsoft ‘iClod’ – July 24, 2006
Enderle: Microsoft’s ‘iPod killer’ Zune is ‘brilliant strategy’ – July 24, 2006
Microsoft’s so-called ‘iPod killer’ Zune won’t zoom up the charts – July 23, 2006
Microsoft confirms ‘iPod Killer’ plans – July 21, 2006
Microsoft’s rumored ‘iPod killer’ poses little threat to Apple’s domination – July 18, 2006
Microsoft plans Super Bowl ad for ‘iPod killer’ – July 17, 2006
Sounds serious: Microsoft approaches iPod accessory makers for Zune would-be ‘iPod killer’ – July 12, 2006
Microsoft preps complete line of Xbox-branded digital-media products – July 11, 2006
Photo of Microsoft’s ‘iPod killer?’ – July 11, 2006
10 reasons why Microsoft’s ‘iPod killer’ will fail – July 11, 2006
Enderle on what it would take for Microsoft to kill Apple’s iPod – July 10, 2006
Microsoft: ‘iPod killer’ reports based on ‘speculation and rumors’ – July 07, 2006
Can Microsoft hit a fast moving target? Apple likely to debut wireless iPod this year – July 07, 2006
Analysts: Microsoft faces uphill fight to supplant Apple’s iPod+iTunes market dominance – July 07, 2006
Microsoft plans to convert iPod users by replacing iTMS songs with free WMA format songs – July 06, 2006
Microsoft to release wireless ‘iPod killer’ by Christmas to challenge Apple – July 05, 2006
Analyst Wu: Microsoft unlikely to dethrone Apple iPod+iTunes – June 21, 2006
Microsoft preps iPod+iTunes killer – June 19, 2006
Report: Microsoft readying Apple iPod+iTunes rival – June 16, 2006
Microsoft: No iPod killer planned – June 05, 2006
Microsoft, Toshiba, DoCoMo, Victor to develop Japan iPod+iTunes killer – June 02, 2006

Patent application shows iPod capable of live wireless video conferencing – June 13, 2006
Apple patent application filed for wireless iPod+iTunes distribution – May 04, 2006
Generator Research: Apple to Ship $4.2bn in Wireless iPods (WiPods) by 2010 – March 14, 2006
Ready for your wireless Apple iPod? – February 09, 2006
Wireless iPod? CSR and PortalPlayer to bring wireless connectivity to personal media players – February 08, 2006
Wireless Apple iPods coming in 2006? – December 09, 2005

More blood on Apple iTunes Music Store’s play button: MyCokeMusic is dead – June 20, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: iRiver gives up on digital media player market – May 23, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Sony’s Walkman Bean is cooked – February 13, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Dell dumps ‘DJ’ hard-drive MP3 player line – February 04, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: iRiver pulling out of Europe? – February 01, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Thomson gives up on MP3 player, CE markets – December 12, 2005
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: BenQ withdraws from MP3 player markets – November 28, 2005
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Olympus halts production of portable digital music players – November 09, 2005
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Rio is dead – August 26, 2005
Apple’s iPod has blood on its Click Wheel: Virgin Electronics is dead – March 08, 2005
Apple’s iTunes Music Store has blood on its play button: BuyMusic.com is dead – March 28, 2004

38 Comments

  1. More money down the toilet. It will be just like the X-Box:”We lose $400 on every unit, but we’ll make it up in volume!” When are they going to fire Ballmer and his cronies?

    In any case, this will most likely be a failure. They are just too dysfunctional these days to pull this off.

    One of my neighbors was working for an ad agency and was working on the MS account. He quit. He said that he just could not justify wasting his life in incessant meetings at MS where NOTHING was ever accomplished. He said that it was always a room full of people who spent the entire meeting on their laptops or Blackberries, nobody paying attention to what was going on.

    I don’t think anyone there, especially Ballmer, has the attention span to focus on a project and have it succeed.

  2. 20% of the iPod market is logical. And smaller than the 20% of the portable player market.

    Consider the iPod is a moving target. So for example today’s portable player market is 100 units. 80 units of that is the iPod and 20 units of that is everyone else. M$ wants 20% of the iPod market, thus they want 16 units.

    The market is growing at what 50% annually? So three years from now the market is 337.5 units. M$ has spent billions to get to 16 units in 3 years, or as the market has grown just under 5% market share. Which in M$’s warped logic would be a victory because they achieved their goal. Meanwhile M$’s partners have doubled their units in that period to 40 units and the iPod has almost than tripled it’s sales to over 280 units.

  3. wmd, you’re exactly right . . . and that’s precisely the problem for MonkeySoft.

    There will come a time when the company will either have to sh*t or get off the pot with that enormous cash reserve. BILLIONS sitting around doing nothing (essentially) is partial explanation for MS’s remarkable stock malaise over the past seven or eight years.** If they don’t begin to put this money to good, profitable, growth-based use pretty soon, you will see a stockholder revolt the likes of which the tech sector has NEVER seen.

    _________________

    ** Five years ago MS was bumping into and around $34 per share. Today it closed at $23.80, a 30% decline in that period. Clearly, the lack of innovation, vision, and leadership within that company is rotting it from the inside; only time will tell if Herr Ballmer can TRULY become the “font of creativity” he recently promised to be. Certainly “Zune” doesn’t fulfill that promise, for it’s just another in a long line of “MonkeySee” products.

  4. Here is the real question. . . WHY do they want to do that? I mean seriously. Stick to a few good things. Not 112341234 bad things. . Seriously. Tomorrow they will be spending millions to beat out McDonalds or something.

  5. I think Zune will be huge.

    Me and my posse need archive dls of Duran Duran. We’ll put gel in our hair and smoke some righteous buds in support of the cause. Let’s all meet at Taco Bell at midnight or at Mike’s place. His folks are in Bermuda. He’s got a cool axe and some Marshalls. Let’s all hook up at myplace unless friendster takes over.

  6. The Xbox analogy – ie selling the console for a loss and making money back on the game licenses and Xbox Live fees (not sure of that myself – anybody know if MS makes a profit there?) does not hold true for Zune.

    1 – MS cannot make money from the store by impose ruiniously high “DRM” fees for music to be “Zune compatible” because its competing with Apple (who breaks even or takes a loss on it store)and the plain-jane CD. So the revenue stream of games (like the Xbox) isn’t there. They MIGHT be planning to do that with a subscription service, but nobody has really shown that a subscription model can compete with iTunes.

    2 – MS is selling their player at a loss and trying to make money on their store….while their competitor (Apple) makes ridiculous profits on the player and breaks even on the store. FACT: Apple makes money even if you never, ever buy anything from the store. MS is counting on making money by tying you into their infrastructure. Like the Xbox, the best way to hurt MS is buy a bunch of Zunes and then bury them in the backyard.

  7. Here’s a crazy thought, instead of hoarding cash, or bleeding billions of $$$ into white elephants like Xbox and Zune, why doesn’t M$ pay a dividend to its shareholders. THAT would be a radical product. Guaranteed to boost the stock price.

  8. HOW MICROSOFT CAN WIN AGAINST APPLE’S IPOD

    “Hello, I’m Clippy, would you like to buy a song on Zune?”

    no

    “Hello, I’m Clippy, would you like to buy a song on Zune?”

    no

    “Hello, I’m Clippy, would you like to buy a song on Zune?”

    ok

    “Hello, I’m Clippy, would you like to buy Zune Player to play that Zune song?”

    no

    “Hello, I’m Clippy, would you like to buy Zune Player?”

    no

    “Hello, I’m Clippy, would you like to buy Zune Player?”

    no

    “Hello, I’m Clippy, would you like to buy a song on Zune?”

    no

  9. They aren’t interested in 20%. They want the whole damn market. When ever has Microsoft been content with co-existing with their rivals? They are like a plague of locusts from one technology to the next. Hopefully something will put an end to it somehow, but they can afford to make mistakes and survive for the rest of our natural lives, that’s for sure. They’re cashed up like a friggin bank!

  10. You can bet that Apple will be willing to risk it all again on the next iPod. That’s what they did when they replaced the mini with the nano (see the wikipedia article “ipod nano”). So… good luck to Microsoft.

    You can also bet that Apple will do the same with its OS. If Leopard is anything less than amazing, I will be disappointed. It has to deliver either the killer app or a new user experience. Otherwise, people will settle for Vista’s eye-candy.

  11. I think it will be a really good thing if Microsoft spend millions promoting Zune, but don’t make much of an impression.

    They and their apologists keep trying to make people believe that the iPod only succeeded because it was heavily promoted. If they spend even more but fail to succeed, it will show that advertising isn’t the only factor.

    Of course everybody else knows that the secret of the iPod’s success was word-of-mouth publicity, but the Microsoft FUD machine tries to play down that side of things.

    Naturally, their army of loyal writers will be loudly singing the praises of Zune and by an amazing coincidence will find that there are ‘serious’ issues that the public will need to be warned about over iPods, but the public will know that their particular iPod doesn’t have that problem and will remain happy with them.

    It’s very important to Apple that Microsoft are seen to pull out all the stops to promote Zune. Half-hearted measures like we’ve seen from other MP3 manufacturers haven’t made much of an impression, so Steve will goad Bill into trying as hard as possible and failing all the more spectacularly. Steve will be able to play Ballmer like a fish on a line.

  12. Apple gets by with 2-4% of the computer market so why can´t Microsoft get by with a small fraction of the MP3 market?

    Microsoft has never claimed to say they were trying to put the iPod out of the business; they see a chance to make some money on the MP3 market. Just like they did with the game console market.

  13. Just a thought-but wouldn’t M$ be better served spending years (instead of minutes) and millions (instead of $5.00) on Vista security instead of backing a loser hope of beating Apple at one of its strongest areas? Idiots!

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.