Zune: Apple cannot lose. Microsoft cannot win.

“The announcement of Zune did one thing, if one thing only. It didn’t just send fear through the hearts of iPod product planners, but through those beating organs of Microsoft partners too,” Charlie Demerjian writes for The Inquirer. “For the Vole has a long history of screwing its partners, sometimes on a whim, sometimes with planning, and we are in the midst of another chapter of that book.”

“For those of you living in a cave, Apple built a better mousetrap, painted it white, and made it the object of pretentious fashion-slaves everywhere. They sell by the millions, and Apple now controls about 80 per cent of that market. Microsoft came along with a slew of third-rate, knock-off technologies, none of which is worth writing about, with crushing DRM baked in to the DNA,” Demerjian writes. “The software giant did about as well as the guy at the county fair offering to hit you on the head with a crowbar for a mere $100, and now all the other Microsoft providers together control a quarter of Apple’s marketshare.”

Demerjian writes, “For the first time, Microsoft is making the damn thing instead of licensing the code or protocols. You have companies like iRiver who make really great products on an R&D budget less than what the Vole spends on coffee for its ad people. It won’t be able to compete. So, with Zune, Microsoft is going to take an already fragmented market, IE not iPod, and steamroller over it. In a year, you will have a choice between iPod and Zune, with a bunch of no-name store brand clones clinging by their fingernails to the low-margin market. If you made the mistake of partnering with Microsoft over media players, you are going to get crushed.”

Full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “LinuxGuy” for the heads up.]
By SteveJack

On one hand, Microsoft’s “partners” deserve what’s coming to them because they really have failed quite miserably. On the other hand, Microsoft remains one of the scummiest companies on earth.

Apple cannot lose. And Microsoft cannot win. That Microsoft is even trying Zune now only highlights their rampant mismanagement and bad decision-making.

The Zune announcement didn’t send fear through the hearts of iPod product planners, it sent laughter from their bellies.

If Microsoft’s Zune shows any real signs of life — a longshot based on history; Microsoft’s been trying to best iPod for half a decade already — Apple CEO Steve Jobs can simply license FairPlay to Microsoft’s former “partners” at very favorable terms to Apple, as they do face Microsoft’s big scary steamroller. Favorable terms will naturally include dropping “Plays For Sure” Windows Media DRM compatibility and FairPlay exclusivity for an extended period of time.

People aren’t going to stop buying iPods just because some other lesser companies finally have iTunes-compatible players. Ditto for buying from the iTunes Store. Jobs has to be thanking Microsoft which must be why he goaded them into this Zune nonsense in the first place. After everyone else licenses FairPlay from Apple, then everyone — except Microsoft — will be iPod+iTunes compatible. Game. Set. Match.

SteveJack is a long-time Macintosh user, web designer, multimedia producer and a regular contributor to the MacDailyNews Opinion section.

[Update: 1:50pm EDT: revised “past history” to read simply “history.”]

Related articles:
Opinion: More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Microsoft pulls plug on Zune – July 25, 2006
Analyst: Microsoft partners zune to be the biggest losers – July 25, 2006
Does ‘Alexandria’ video show Microsoft’s Apple ‘iTunes killer? – July 25, 2006
In wake of Zune, Microsoft ‘partners’ consider abandoning PlaysForSure – July 25, 2006
Wi-Fi seen limiting battery life on Microsoft’s Zune – July 24, 2006
Why Microsoft’s Zune is doomed to fail – July 24, 2006
Bear Stearns analyst expects Apple to respond to Microsoft’s ‘challenge’ with new iPod innovations – July 24, 2006
Microsoft Zune? They should’ve called it the Microsoft ‘iClod’ – July 24, 2006
Enderle: Microsoft’s ‘iPod killer’ Zune is ‘brilliant strategy’ – July 24, 2006
Microsoft’s so-called ‘iPod killer’ Zune won’t zoom up the charts – July 23, 2006
Microsoft confirms ‘iPod Killer’ plans – July 21, 2006
Microsoft’s rumored ‘iPod killer’ poses little threat to Apple’s domination – July 18, 2006
Microsoft plans Super Bowl ad for ‘iPod killer’ – July 17, 2006
Sounds serious: Microsoft approaches iPod accessory makers for Zune would-be ‘iPod killer’ – July 12, 2006
Microsoft preps complete line of Xbox-branded digital-media products – July 11, 2006
Photo of Microsoft’s ‘iPod killer?’ – July 11, 2006
10 reasons why Microsoft’s ‘iPod killer’ will fail – July 11, 2006
Enderle on what it would take for Microsoft to kill Apple’s iPod – July 10, 2006
Microsoft: ‘iPod killer’ reports based on ‘speculation and rumors’ – July 07, 2006
Can Microsoft hit a fast moving target? Apple likely to debut wireless iPod this year – July 07, 2006
Analysts: Microsoft faces uphill fight to supplant Apple’s iPod+iTunes market dominance – July 07, 2006
Microsoft plans to convert iPod users by replacing iTMS songs with free WMA format songs – July 06, 2006
Microsoft to release wireless ‘iPod killer’ by Christmas to challenge Apple – July 05, 2006
Analyst Wu: Microsoft unlikely to dethrone Apple iPod+iTunes – June 21, 2006
Microsoft preps iPod+iTunes killer – June 19, 2006
Report: Microsoft readying Apple iPod+iTunes rival – June 16, 2006
Microsoft: No iPod killer planned – June 05, 2006
Microsoft, Toshiba, DoCoMo, Victor to develop Japan iPod+iTunes killer – June 02, 2006
Steve Jobs’ suggestion of Microsoft-branded MP3 player a precursor to FairPlay licensing? – January 20, 2006

Patent application shows iPod capable of live wireless video conferencing – June 13, 2006
Apple patent application filed for wireless iPod+iTunes distribution – May 04, 2006
Generator Research: Apple to Ship $4.2bn in Wireless iPods (WiPods) by 2010 – March 14, 2006
Ready for your wireless Apple iPod? – February 09, 2006
Wireless iPod? CSR and PortalPlayer to bring wireless connectivity to personal media players – February 08, 2006
Wireless Apple iPods coming in 2006? – December 09, 2005

More blood on Apple iTunes Music Store’s play button: MyCokeMusic is dead – June 20, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: iRiver gives up on digital media player market – May 23, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Sony’s Walkman Bean is cooked – February 13, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Dell dumps ‘DJ’ hard-drive MP3 player line – February 04, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: iRiver pulling out of Europe? – February 01, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Thomson gives up on MP3 player, CE markets – December 12, 2005
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: BenQ withdraws from MP3 player markets – November 28, 2005
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Olympus halts production of portable digital music players – November 09, 2005
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Rio is dead – August 26, 2005
Apple’s iPod has blood on its Click Wheel: Virgin Electronics is dead – March 08, 2005
Apple’s iTunes Music Store has blood on its play button: BuyMusic.com is dead – March 28, 2004

42 Comments

  1. Steve Jobs is not afraid of what MS would do with their music/entertainment player. I know the good reputation Steve Job has is that he keeps his business 5 years ahead of modern technology. So don’t worry about Zune.

  2. oh come on.

    this is so lame.

    apple cannot lose? yeah, they can. monopolies don’t last forever people, and microsoft can build a better mousetrap. or at least a very compelling one that will cause some to buy the zune instead of the ipod.

    this site is sometiems great for news, but this is total trash.

  3. I hate when MDN takes get so damn arrogant.

    Zune is not released, we know nothing about it. It may be shit, it may be great.. It may flop, it may succeed. The point is, WE DON’T KNOW..

    So lose the arrogance and wait until the product is released before you spout off your childish assumptions.

  4. It remains to be seen whether or not licensing FairPlay to the also-rans will ever be necessary. For as long as Apple continues to maintain 70-80% marketshare it certainly isn’t.

    All this Zune is going to accomplish is to dominate the 20-25% of the market (while crushing their former partners in the process) that Apple doesn’t already have. In the end, Microsoft won’t have any more marketshare than they did before with the ill-fated PlaysForSure scheme.

    Apple has already sold well over 1 billion songs and 35 million videos via the iTMS, all of which will be 100% incompatible with Zune. Those people aren’t just going to scrap their purchased music and video libraries and start all over again simply because Microsoft asks them to.

  5. Over at Mini-Microsoft’s blog http://minimsft.blogspot.com/2006/07/we-are-fam-ily-links.html Mini obviously thinks different.

    Quote: “….Are we screwing our partners? I don’t think so. We’ve given them a great platform to implement Plays for Sure and plenty of time to innovate long before we come along and try implementing a device.”

    So since iRiver, Creative etc haven’t won the battle for us, it’s OK to screw them.

    That’s alright then. For all the fact that Mini (an MS insider) is one of the most vociferous critics of the current MS hierarchy, he’s obviously a true Microsoftie at heart. Winning is all and screw anyone who gets in the way.

  6. Zune 1.0 = iPod Gen 1 in form factor and design, maybe Gen 3 if we are feeling generous. Typical MS, always about 3 generations behind anything Apple does. But the MS crazies will think the Zune is the “latest and greatest” just like Vista with no credit given to Apple.

    iPod Gen 6 with a widescreen, full flash based memory (think very thin) and proximity input will completely blow away the Zune.

    Plus I bet a new aluminum nano in multiple colors and a larger screen will be released since the original mini was so popular.

    And yes, Apple will beat MS to the movie offerings on iTunes.

  7. Microsoft is alienating their current partners. When all those partners get fed up and drop ‘Plays For Sure’ and their ties to Microsoft, what will happen if Apple steps forward and offers to license them FairPlay? At that point, Apple’s format will become the undisputed industry standard, while Microsoft’s will become a niche player, and it will be too late for them. Even if Microsoft then realizes what has happened and tries to get back in good terms with their former partners, the current backstab will most likely not be forgotten,. Who would choose any Microsoft solution for their player when they could have access to FairPlay and all that it implies?

    The headline and the MacDailyNews Take are 100% correct.

    I have written more at Softpedia Zune- A Major Threat To Everyone Except Apple

  8. Whether you happen to care about Zune or not, it is germane to Apple and will affect future product dev and/or company strategy.

    If you’re tired of Zune stories, the subject is clearly indicated in the headline, so don’t click it. Simple enough?

  9. The funniest thing is that people act as though the Zune were something completely independent of any other effort Microsoft has ever made. This allows them to say, “Hey, Microsoft could get it right this time!” with a straight face. People, are you the same ones saying that last line about Windows? How long have you been saying it? What makes you think that Microsoft can innovate anything at all? That’s not their corporate DNA. Again, to state the obvious — Microsoft either buys its competitors, or it imitates them with derivative designs or functionality to avoid the courts. Then, it simply spends the other companies into the ground. If you’re expecting something novel, exciting, and different from that company, you are incredibly deluded.

  10. Microsoft will do magrinally well with this venture….why? well every non techno savvy person that buys the cheapest PC money can buy will be directed to this store/player combo….microsoft will do ok with this unfortunatly…but thats the only reason why

    uninformed users

  11. No seriously, when are they going to say they are only kidding?
    Micro$oft cant really think they are doing this, are they? Are they really that dumb?
    When will this late April fools joke go away?

  12. “. . . a long shot based on past history”

    Yep, that’s where all of my history is . . . in the past. (That’s like saying “return back,” “3 AM in the morning,” “perfectly square,” and the like. Redundant redundancies all.)

  13. MDN takes are way, way off.

    Here is what MDN is staying:

    1. MS parnters get steamrolled by Zune.

    2. iPod sales won’t get dented by licensing FairPlay to competitors shunned by MS.

    So why then license to companies who are destined to die off anyways?

    1. Apple takes a chance at losing iPod sales?
    No.
    2. Apple wants to completely break their brand with other players entering the fold?
    No.
    3. Apple wants to go in an entirely new license direction, by having a few low-volume parnters on board?
    No.

    Apple wants these would-be MS partners to die off leaving their users in no-mans-land. Thus they must choose between Zune and iPod.

    What are the odds these people won’t go with iPod this time around? Probaby very low, as they were just burned by MS, and iPod/iTunes is the completely mature product/service to go with.

    So long as Apple completely dominates with iPod/iTunes, do not count on them ever changing their business model.

  14. Right now that’s true, Apple can’t lose. But if Apple thinks that, they could slip. Let’s not get back into the “Windows 95 = Mac ’89” mentality that got us here in the first place!

  15. Here’s the thing: the iPod is a brilliantly designed product with almost total control of the market. Microsoft often makes subpar products, especially compared to what Apple produces.

    So will Zune topple iPod? Doubtful. But do any of our opinions actually mean shit? Sorry Mac Freaks, no, they don’t.

    We know nothing of the Zune, save for that Microsoft is making it, and for most of you, that’s enough to damn it. Look, I own a nano, and love it, but I hope that the Zune is a great product, simply because more great products benefits us all as consumers.

    Think on it, fanatics.

  16. Zune is by far MS’s best attempt yet at competing with Apple on the music front. Nothing else they’ve done with their partners has even come close. Other than abandon the market completely this is really their only choice.

    If Apple has 75% to the others 25% I think Zune will end up with 25% total — leaving Apple with 70% and the others with 5%. Remember that a very small percentage of the population already owns an iPod so many new customers are out there to be had. Some will buy Zune simply because they are geeks and hate Apple. Others will be Zune because they see it as a complete end to end solution — they just won’t realize the Apple solution is many times better.

    What MS can’t do is leverage their large installed base to help them out as they did with Windows. With Apple offering solutions for Mac & Windows it is Apple that has been leveraging the large windows base for several years now.

    I think we’ll eventually see FairPlay opened either by allowing other players or by allowing other stores into iTunes, or both. MDN is right, that would be game over for MS. It may not be necessary but Apple needs to let a few into the fold before MS crushes them into extinction. Just in the interest of avoiding anti-competition claims it would be worth it to allow a SanDisk or another company to have a license. By licensing FairPlay DRM, the iPod connector, and the iTunes Music store to others any gains MS might make could be lost again. Apple should not control more than 80% of the hardware market.

    Remember, this is not about MP3 players but digital standards for the next 15-20 years and potential control of the living room/household. MS must redeem itself in the MP3 market or it might as well kiss its entire digital home strategy goodbye.

  17. It doesn’t matter how many songs iTMS has sold. What matters is the ownership of the platform. And the platform that matters is Quicktime. If Apple licences Fairplay and all the other sites use it they also will use Quicktime for the video compatiblity, not just audio. Once Quicktime becomes the standard, all the WMA, WMV and PlaysForSure stuff becomes obsolete. All Apple needs is to get one penny per song or 2 pennies per video in licencing and they have a nice little money stream. A billion songs from iTMS on its own, but many billions from around the world and all the other sites, that’s where the money is.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.