Enderle on what it would take for Microsoft to kill Apple’s iPod

“There are a lot of rumors this week about Microsoft’s anticipated iPod Killer,” Rob Enderle writes for Digital Trends.

If the rumors are true, “would create an interesting event where, on the Operating System front, Apple may have beat Microsoft to market with Leopard, while on the MP3 front, Microsoft has hit Apple equally hard,” Enderle writes. “Let’s take a look at what the components of an iPod Killer would have to be in order to truly ‘kill’ the iPod and whether Microsoft has the right stuff to even be a contender.”

According to Enderle:
• “Microsoft actually does have competitive design skills” to “beat Apple on design.”
• In “Ease of Use, “Microsoft has the potential” to “beat Apple.”
• “Apple is the most secure” on the issue of marketing, “the third leg of Apple’s competitive advantage.”

Enderle concludes, “Microsoft could build a product that would be an iPod Killer, but right now they aren’t demonstrating the marketing competence that would be required to allow the device to rise to its full potential… while Microsoft could build an iPod Killer, they currently lack the marketing capability to kill the iPod with it.”

Full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Michael L.” for the heads up.]
Enderle, as usual, has it all backwards. It is in the areas of “design skill” and “ease of use” that Apple is hardly threatened by Microsoft’s current vapor. It’s the “marketing” area at which Microsoft could throw vast sums of cash that Apple would be reluctant or unable to match.

The Joy of Tech: Things Microsoft could do to make you switch to their iPod killer.

Advertisements:
Introducing the super-fast, blogging, podcasting, do-everything-out-of-the-box MacBook.  Starting at just $1099.
Get the new iMac with Intel Core Duo for as low as $31 A MONTH with Free shipping!
Get the MacBook Pro with Intel Core Duo for as low as $47 A MONTH with Free Shipping!
Apple’s new Mac mini. Intel Core, up to 4 times faster. Starting at just $599. Free shipping.
iPod. 15,000 songs. 25,000 photos. 150 hours of video. The new iPod. 30GB and 60GB models start at just $299. Free shipping.
Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.
iPod Radio Remote. Listen to FM radio on your iPod and control everything with a convenient wired remote. Just $49.

Related articles:
Enderle spouts some incredible nonsense about Apple iPod+iTunes – July 07, 2006
Enderle: If Apple can’t double market share it will abandon Macs – May 02, 2006
Enderle: Apple as Windows OEM – April 10, 2006
Enderle: Microsoft’s ‘PlaysForSure’ going to be a long-term problem for Apple – January 09, 2006
Big surprise: Enderle was wrong about Apple’s holiday quarter Mac sales – January 19, 2006
Enderle: What if Microsoft bought Apple? – April 03, 2006
Enderle: Apple+Intel could be wonderful for those of us that love design and use Windows – December 26, 2005
Enderle admits Apple’s switch to Intel not hurting Mac sales, says Apple ‘has never looked stronger’ – December 08, 2005
Enderle: ‘Some people got really excited by the new iPod, but a growing number of people did not’ – October 19, 2005
Tech pundit Enderle: ‘Microsoft wrote the first Mac OS’ – September 28, 2005
Tech pundit Enderle incorrectly compares Apple’s Mac OS to iPod licensing – September 01, 2005
Enderle: ‘Surveys indicate demand for Apple’s products is dropping like a rock’ due to Intel switch – August 01, 2005
Rob Enderle’s latest Windows Vista article is ‘vapid and incomprehensible’ – August 01, 2005
Enderle: ‘iPod Halo Effect is just a myth, same thing as having Paris Hilton visit Apple stores’ – May 02, 2005
Tech pundit Enderle: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger’s main features ‘borrow heavily from Longhorn’ – May 02, 2005
Tech Pundit Enderle: ‘This year will be more difficult for Apple Computer’ and iMacs in earthquakes – January 24, 2005
Enderle: Gateway’s MP3 Photo Jukebox ‘ahead of the Apple design curve, like the iPod of the next-generation – November 08, 2004

29 Comments

  1. If Microsoft has the design skills then he’s saying that they’re just not using them – I’ll let that go. when he says they have the potential to beat them on ease of use, he’s saying that they don’t actually have it at the moment. So what’s he’s effectively saying is that a company may, potentially, in the future be able to do something they can’t do now. Wow!

  2. “It’s the “marketing” area at which Microsoft could throw vast sums of cash that Apple would be reluctant or unable to match.”

    For the iPod?? I don’t think so. Besides, with the position Apple currently is in with the iPod, they don’t have to run as large an ad campaign to get the word out. A few ads on TV and in print and word of mouth will take care of the rest.

    Remember “plays for sure”?

    Thought not. ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” />

  3. Enderle’s posts lack the intellectual impact of a rigorously researched report or well-thought analysis. Enderle’s “interpretations” are typically sparsely constructed generalized opinions based on incomplete data, untested assumptions, and inaccurate conclusions. Reading anything Enderle writes will make you more stupid after the fact.

  4. Why has it taken Enderle 5 years to think through this “brilliant strategy”? How long must Enderele contemplate a technological conundrum to arrive at an ostensibly obvious answer? If the solution to counter Apple’s achievements is so patently evident, why has no one else been successful in competing with Apple?

    People like Enderle haven’t a clue how to do much of anything except post what can best be described as mental excrement or cognitive caca.

  5. Look at the XBox, XBox 360, and Microsoft’s higher-end keyboards and mice. They actually do some pretty decent hardware design. Maybe they can’t design a cultural icon like the iPod, but they can make something that works well and looks nice.

    Look at XBox Live or the XBoxes’ operating systems. Microsoft actually can make simple, easy-to-use interfaces. Spend five minutes on Live and you’ll agree: any idiot can figure it out.

    As far as marketing, Apple is WAY ahead of Microsoft. If Jobs were heading up the Vista project he’d have spun it into the most hotly anticipated product of the decade, regardless of delays, rather than an industry laughing stock. Microsoft just comes up with crap likes “Plays for Sure.” Obviously really bad marketing.

    I’m as big a Mac-head as anyone, but you guys are way too quick to jump on anything remotely positive about Microsoft.

  6. The new M$ MP3 player would sport 63 buttons, a full sized QWERTY keyboard, and a harddrive with the ability to be partitioned into mini 1KB file sizes. It will come with a harness and crane so that it can be fully supported on your dashboard. Of course, it could never be used in the hospital or outdoors, causing wide-spread panic from the melting of polar icecaps.

    That would be Enderle’s iPod killer…and a killer of life-form throughout the earth…

  7. (but [some of] you guys are way too quick to jump on anything remotely positive about Microsoft)

    As MS does atleast eight to nine negative things for every ‘positive’, it’s extremely difficult to get all ‘cheerleader’. Their ‘positive’ outcomes appear to be accidents, when compared to their other behavior.

  8. Microsoft will definitely NOT be the company to build the iPod killer because they lack the “cool” factor. I have no doubt that eventually the iPod’s share will erode at least some, but it’ll most likely be a variety of little guys that take it, not one single product from an aging monolithic company. MS is just wasting their money.

  9. Colin,

    No matter how decent the design of the XBOX and 360 are the fact is that they can’t pay for themselves in the marketplace and M$ has to take a hit on each one. What’s the point of nice designs if you have to sell them at a loss.

    People keep using the XBOX as example that M$ can do design. The XBOX business model can’t work in the music game. Knockng out a music player at a loss expecting to make money on the content won’t work.

    The labels won’t take a smaller cut and the public won’t pay more than $0.99.

    The iPods have proved that they are great designs and they make a nice healthy pile.

    Making $50-$100 accessories is a totally different thing to a $300 lifestyle icon.

  10. The first Xbox design was a joke. 360 is much improved and very “Apple-esque”. I still think Apple should have kept the pippin going and tried to battle it out in the game industry. Most don’t realize that MS is trying to use the 360 as their secret weapon into the home entertainment space since those XP Media Edition PCs are a joke.

    MS will eventually use Xbox Live to take on iTunes by creating “Live Anywhere” which can be accessed from many devices.

    What I don’t get is why MS went with a crappy DVD drive. It’s very noisy. Most people think the fans are what creates all the noise. Not true, play a DVD movie on the 360 when the drive runs at 1x, it’s almost whisper quiet. Play a game when it’s running at 12x and it sounds like a hair dryer.

  11. it’s going to take a lot more than design to beet iPod+iTunes

    have they considered:

    1) iPods accessory market
    2) integration with automobiles
    3) International iTunes stores
    4) iTunes University

    all these things and more are reinforcing iTunes+iPod as as the only game in town

  12. It’s tough to say who’s crazier Enderle or Dvorak!
    Quote:
    “According to Enderle:
    • “Microsoft actually does have competitive design skills” to “beat Apple on design.”
    • In “Ease of Use, “Microsoft has the potential” to “beat Apple.”
    • “Apple is the most secure” on the issue of marketing, “the third leg of Apple’s competitive advantage.”

    I was watching the SciFi Channel’s Twilight Zone Marathon over the 4th of July weekend. Enderle’s article needs it’s own episode.

    Anyone care to write a typical Rod Serling intro to Enderle’s episode?

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.