Apple will do ‘everything we can’ to lure The Beatles to iTunes Music Store

“Apple Computer Inc., which on May 8 won a trademark dispute with the Beatles over its iTunes music store, said it wants to get rights to sell the digital version of the band’s songs through the online service. ‘We certainly will do everything we can to get them on iTunes,’ Eddy Cue, Apple’s vice president of iTunes, said in an interview yesterday. ‘The Beatles aren’t available in any digital format today but they are going to be one day. We certainly hope that happens on iTunes,'” Bloomberg reports.

“Apple Corps Ltd., which represents the Fab Four’s business interests and is owned by Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, John Lennon’s widow Yoko Ono and the estate of George Harrison, is remastering the entire Beatles catalog to make the songs available for downloading for the first time, Apple Corps’s managing director Neil Aspinall told a London court last month,” Bloomberg reports. “An agreement between Apple Corps and Cupertino, California- based Apple makes financial sense, say analysts. Moira Bellas, a spokeswoman for Apple Corps in London, said today she couldn’t immediately comment.”

“Opened by Apple Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs in April 2003, iTunes is the most popular Web site for digital downloads. The service has a catalog of more than 3 million titles, operates in 21 countries and has sold more than 1 billion songs at 99 cents each. The service has more than a 70 percent share of the market for music downloads, NPD said,” Bloomberg reports. “‘There’s a huge gold mine in the Beatles catalog,’ said Russ Crupnick, a music industry analyst at NPD. ‘There are tens of millions of people who have never bought anything from a digital store, and when they do the tendency is overwhelming to buy it from Apple Computer. When you think about a premier artist like the Beatles, it may drag some of those other people to buy.'”

Full article here.

Get the new iMac with Intel Core Duo for as low as $31 A MONTH with Free shipping!
Get the MacBook Pro with Intel Core Duo for as low as $47 A MONTH with Free Shipping!
Apple’s new Mac mini. Intel Core, up to 4 times faster. Starting at just $599. Free shipping.
Apple’s brand new iPod Hi-Fi speaker system. Home stereo. Reinvented. Available now for $349 with free shipping.
iPod. 15,000 songs. 25,000 photos. 150 hours of video. The new iPod. 30GB and 60GB models start at just $299. Free shipping.
Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.
iPod Radio Remote. Listen to FM radio on your iPod and control everything with a convenient wired remote. Just $49.

Related articles:
Apple Computer beats Beatles in trademark court battle, Beatles plan to appeal – May 08, 2006
Report: Apple vs. Apple judgement to be handed down May 8th – April 28, 2006
Apple Corps confirms plans to offer remastered Beatles songs for downloading, ‘no firm date yet’ – April 13, 2006
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple closing arguments; judge’s ruling due toward end of April – April 05, 2006
Apple vs. Apple likely be in judge’s hands by Wednesday – April 03, 2006
Apple lawyer: ‘Even a moron in a hurry’ can tell difference between iTunes and Beatles’ Apple Corps – March 30, 2006
Apple vs. Apple opening arguments begin in UK High Court – March 29, 2006
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple goes to UK High Court this Wednesday – March 26, 2006
Apple Computer and The Beatles’ AppleCorp should stop fighting in court and work together instead – July 27, 2005
Beatles vs. Apple Computer: outcome is far from a lock for Beatles – September 30, 2004
Apple vs. Apple settlement to result in iTunes Music Store Beatles exclusive? – September 23, 2004
Apple’s iTunes Music Store to land exclusive Beatles deal? – September 20, 2004
Apple vs. Beatles could be solved with fat check and spinning off iTunes from Apple Computer – September 17, 2004
Apple’s settlement with Beatles could be ‘biggest settlement in legal history’ – September 13, 2004
The Beatles to sell songs via Apple iTunes Music Store? – June 09, 2004
Apple loses: Apple v. Beatles to be heard in Britain – April 06, 2004
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple; 1991 agreement allows for ‘data transmission services, even music’ – February 26, 2004
Apple Computer to contest Beatles’ U.K. lawsuit in court today – February 25, 2004
Jobs: Apple vs. Apple ‘could drag on for years – it’s unfortunate because we love the Beatles’ – September 28, 2003
Forbes: Apple vs. Apple; iTunes Music Store just might end up with exclusive Beatles deal – September 12, 2003
Sosumi: more on the Beatles’ lawsuit against Apple Computer, Inc. – September 12, 2003
The Beatles sue Apple Computer over iPod, iTunes – September 12, 2003
The Beatles’ Apple Records could be gearing up for fight with Apple Computer – August 12, 2003
The Beatles gearing up for a fight over Apple’s iTunes Music Store – June 03, 2003


  1. if they do it just to spite apple it would just lead to people ripping the cds or worse still for beatles – illegal downloads, they are soooo greedy im sure they’ll realise and come around.

  2. The Beatles corporate machine is just as greedy as any other. They constantly re-issue and re-package their wares ad nauseum. Now they’re finally remastering the library for digital download use. Whoopdeedooo. Didn’t they just do this for “One”?

    I enjoy their music, but not their whiney protestations and greed. Ironic, considering their mantra back in the day.

  3. To get the Beatles…

    They will demand a high cut of the $.99 per song. They will also demand apple remove the apple logo from iTunes. Without that, no beatles on iTunes. Ball is in the beatle’s court now.

  4. I think the odds are better than iLife will be ported to Windows before the Beatles go on iTunes. Yes, I know that iLife will never be ported, that’s the point. It ain’t going to happen in other words.

  5. What’s the betting that Apple will offer to waive their court costs in order to get the Beatles on board?

    Still, they wouldn’t be able to come to that sort of arrangement until the appeal is done with.

  6. I don’t see the big deal of the Beatles being on iTunes anyway. Doesn’t everyone already own most of their catalog?

    Sheesh, I skip Beatles songs on a regular basis on my iPod when it’s on shuffle.

    Pay for them again? Naaaah.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.