Security company Sophos: Apple Mac the best route for security for the masses

“Experts at UK security company Sophos suggest Apple might be the best route to security for the masses – that is, until consumers all buy one,” Matt Whipp writes for PC Pro. “UK security company’s senior technology consultant Graham Cluley rolled out the damning virus statistics for 2005, showing that with a 48 per cent rise in new viruses, buying a Windows box has never been more risky.”

Whipp writes, “This year saw nearly 16,000 new viruses added to the Sophos database… Plug an unprotected Apple or Linux box onto the Internet, and you can expect to see the infection rate flatline, said Cluley. That’s not to say there are no viruses for Mac OS X or the various Linux distributions, but Windows viruses dwarf them. ‘It wouldn’t really work for businesses,’ said Cluley, ‘But for consumers I think [Apple] is quite good.'”

Whipp writes, “You can accuse it of security through obscurity, but in a world where 70 per cent of Windows users don’t feel the responsibility of securing their computers, perhaps they are better off with a less targetted platform. Perhaps they don’t deserve Windows… Last month saw the biggest slew of new viruses on record, with some 1,940 new signatures added to the Sophos library.”

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Where, oh where, do they make this caliber of idiot writers? There are zero Mac OS X viruses. None. Nada. Zilch. Nil. Just zero. As in, none. 0. Security via Obscurity is a myth clung to by people who’ve unfortunately wasted their time and money upon Windows and now need a defense mechanism to protect their fragile minds from realizing the depths of their mistake. See Stockholm Syndrome for related information. Mac OS X would work for businesses and does work for thousands worldwide each and every day. Whipp writes, “Perhaps they don’t deserve Windows.” Who does deserve Windows, exactly? Our list: Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, Rob Enderle, Rob Glaser, Saddam Hussein, death row inmates, all members of The Society of Inept Imitations, followers, console-less gamers, those too cheap for their own good, Wal-Mart computer shoppers (don’t buy your computer in Wal-Mart, folks), those unable to understand price/performance and/or total cost of ownership, people who’d rather work on getting their computers to work than using their computers to get work done, people who don’t understand that you get what you pay for, those who want to risk the contents of their computers, those who want to be scammed, those who enjoy monopoly abusers, sadomasochists, Registry lovers, people who see only sticker prices, those who like things upside down and backwards, people who think intuitive things are too easy, spyware/bloatware/malware/adware/virus/worm developers…

There are zero-percent (0%) of viruses for the Mac OS X platform that should, logically, have some 10-16% of the world’s viruses if platforms’ install bases dictated the numbers of viruses. The fact that Mac OS X has zero (0) viruses discounts “security via obscurity.” There should be at least some Mac OS X viruses. There are none. The reason for this fact is not attributable solely to “obscurity,” it’s attributable to superior security design.

According to Apple, there are “close to 16 million Mac OS X users” in the world and there are still zero (0) viruses. According to CNET, the Windows Vista Beta was released “to about 10,000 testers” at the time the first Windows Vista virus arrived. So much for the security via obscurity myth.

Advertisements: The New iMac G5. Built-in camera and remote control. From $1299. Free shipping.
Apple USB Modem. Easily connect to the Internet using your dial-up service. $49.00.
The New iPod with Video. The ultimate music & video experience on the go. From $299. Free shipping.
Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.00.

Related MacDailyNews articles:
Microsoft Windows virus spreads rapidly; Apple Macintosh unaffected – November 28, 2005
Computer columnist: anti-virus software purely optional for Apple Macs, not so for Windows – November 01, 2005
Microsoft apologists and why Apple’s Mac OS X has zero viruses – October 24, 2005
NY Times’ Pogue: Apple’s iMac G5 with sleek, virus-free, spyware-free OS earns place in living room – October 19, 2005
$500 bounty offered for proof of first Apple Mac OS X virus – September 27, 2005
Symantec: 10,866 new Microsoft Windows virus and worm variants in first half 2005 – September 19, 2005
How to avoid viruses and malware? Dump your Windows PC and get an Apple Macintosh – August 22, 2005
Do Apple Mac OS X users need antivirus software? – August 22, 2005
ZDNet: How many Mac OS X users affected by the last 100 viruses? None, zero, not one, not ever – August 18, 2005
Hackers already targeting viruses for Microsoft’s Windows Vista – August 04, 2005
16-percent of computer users are unaffected by viruses, malware because they use Apple Macs – June 15, 2005
Intel CEO Otellini: If you want security now, buy a Macintosh instead of a Wintel PC – May 25, 2005
There are no viruses for Apple’s Mac OS X – May 13, 2005
Apple touts Mac OS X security advantages over Windows – April 13, 2005
97,467 Microsoft Windows viruses vs. zero for Apple Mac’s OS X – April 05, 2005
Apple’s Mac OS X is virus-free – March 18, 2005
Cybersecurity advisor Clarke questions why anybody would buy from Microsoft – February 18, 2005
Security test: Windows XP system easily compromised while Apple’s Mac OS X stands safe and secure – November 30, 2004
Microsoft: The safest way to run Windows is on your Mac – October 08, 2004
Information Security Investigator says switch from Windows to Mac OS X for security – September 24, 2004
New York Times: Mac OS X ‘much more secure than Windows XP’ – September 18, 2003
Defending Windows over Mac a sign of mental illness – December 20, 2003

43 Comments

  1. After reading the article, it just makes me wonder if there are really any real journalists left in this small world. This article is so bobus that the author is just spewing bovine fecal matter. What makes this even worse is that it has hit the proverbial fan. I would strong urge the mac community to write to the editor and demand an immediate retraction.

  2. jeez! Calm down MDN. or change the “Take” to the “frustrated Rant”

    Don’t sugercoat it, tell us how you really feel.

    (Was in EB Games yesterday looking at a CrashBox 360 (actually trolling for reasons to dis it), told this kid i refused to have anything from Microsoft in my house, he says “So you don’t have a computer then?” This from a kid I am sure knows what an iPod is. The musician I was talking to knew I meant Macs of course, as he is a not so recent switcher)

    MW-efforts, my efforts in trolling were successful

  3. My God…
    MDN just cannot take a complement to OSX can it?

    In an article talking predominantly about Windows, the following are the bottom-line, take-home messages the article-reader gets.

    1- “Plug an unprotected XP computer to the Internet and there’s only a 6 per cent chance of avoiding infection within an hour. “

    2- “But there are other options. Plug an unprotected Apple or Linux box onto the Internet, and you can expect to see the infection rate flatline, said Cluley.”

    That’s not bad IMHO.

  4. MDN, Be careful with that “Don’t buy your computer at Wal-Mart” stuff. Who knows how much time and market share it will take before we see Macs at “the Wall-marks”

  5. Man, I live for the MDN takes, awesome, yes, I need a life. Gee, that Western Union ad is in my face, but what can i say I haven’t spent a dime here, and I visit MDN everyday.

    mw-outside, but s__t its -4 F.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.