John Lennon’s solo work goes online, Apple iTunes Music Store conspicuously excluded

“The entire solo catalog of the late rock icon John Lennon will be made available for Internet download for the first time in December, his record label has said,” Reuters reports. “The digital release of Lennon’s collection makes him the first former Beatle whose whole body of solo work has been made commercially available on legitimate online music services, EMI Music said.”

Reuters reports, “The Lennon material will be sold by such online music services as Napster, Rhapsody, MSN Music and Yahoo Music Unlimited. One music site conspicuously excluded from the digital release is iTunes due to a trademark dispute between its parent company, Apple Computer Inc, and the Beatles’ Apple Corps Ltd over competing names of the two entities.”

Reuters reports, “The digital release of Lennon’s songs roughly coincides with two notable red-letter dates — his would-have-been 65th birthday last month and the 25th anniversary of his murder by a deranged fan outside his New York apartment building on December 8, 1980.”

Full article here.

Advertisements: The New iMac G5 – Built-in iSight camera and remote control with Front Row media experience. From $1299. Free shipping.
The New iPod with Video.  The ultimate music + video experience on the go.  From $299.  Free shipping.

Related articles:
Apple Computer and The Beatles’ AppleCorp should stop fighting in court and work together instead – July 27, 2005
Beatles vs. Apple Computer: outcome is far from a lock for Beatles – September 30, 2004
Apple vs. Apple settlement to result in iTunes Music Store Beatles exclusive? – September 23, 2004
Apple’s iTunes Music Store to land exclusive Beatles deal? – September 20, 2004
Apple vs. Beatles could be solved with fat check and spinning off iTunes from Apple Computer – September 17, 2004
Apple’s settlement with Beatles could be ‘biggest settlement in legal history’ – September 13, 2004
The Beatles to sell songs via Apple iTunes Music Store? – June 09, 2004
Apple loses: Apple v. Beatles to be heard in Britain – April 06, 2004
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple; 1991 agreement allows for ‘data transmission services, even music’ – February 26, 2004
Apple Computer to contest Beatles’ U.K. lawsuit in court today – February 25, 2004
Jobs: Apple vs. Apple ‘could drag on for years – it’s unfortunate because we love the Beatles’ – September 28, 2003
Forbes: Apple vs. Apple; iTunes Music Store just might end up with exclusive Beatles deal – September 12, 2003
Sosumi: more on the Beatles’ lawsuit against Apple Computer, Inc. – September 12, 2003
The Beatles sue Apple Computer over iPod, iTunes – September 12, 2003
The Beatles’ Apple Records could be gearing up for fight with Apple Computer – August 12, 2003
The Beatles gearing up for a fight over Apple’s iTunes Music Store – June 03, 2003


  1. Actually, I don’t think the dispute is “petty” at all. Their earlier agreement stated that Apple Computer wouldn’t get into the music business. At the time, this wasn’t an issue.

    Now, of course, Apple Computer is totally immersed in the music business. Apple Corps has a right to be pissed with them.

    For all our sakes, however, I hope that they settle this like gentlemen (i.e. Steve Jobs gives Neil Aspinall a sh*tload of money) so we can download Beatles tunes from iTunes.

  2. “You know how to reunite the Beatles?
    Shoot the other two.”

    Unless someone also shhots Yoko so she can break them up again. ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”tongue wink” style=”border:0;” />

  3. Those saying disparaging comments about Yoko …. Well, opinions are like belly buttons … etc..

    Those saying Paul had the most to do with the success of the Fab Four, couldnt have been around back then…

    Truth be told … it was John who actually wrote the lions share of the songs, now attributed to the “Lennon/McCartney” team…
    (Even today, Paul describes The Beatles as … “Johns Band”)

    It was, in fact, John who was the brains of the band..

    It was John who successfully pulled off what was probably the greatest marketing coup (ever)..of that era.. Those who were alive back then know what I mean ..

    Everyone, back then, had their favorites, but to dismiss Johns contribution is to miss the whole point of what the collective group accomplished..

    As far as Apple Corps refusing to sell their library on the ITMS … well, its their loss…

    Besides… who wants to “rent” their music encoded in that WinCrap Media format…anyhoo ?

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.