Who will be Apple CEO when Steve Jobs retires?

“If Steve Jobs ever steps down, Tim Cook’s elevation to COO confirms him as the top candidate to fill his shoes. Actually, make that to try to fill them,” Arik Hesseldahl and Peter Burrows write for BusinessWeek. “Tim Cook just moved up in the Apple Computer world — or so it might appear. Cook, Apple’s vice-president for worldwide sales, was named chief operating officer on Oct. 14. Apple explained the move by saying it’s a job that Cook, in effect, already had.”

“What does the new title mean for Cook’s role as a would-be successor to Jobs? Apple certainly needs to resolve the matter at some stage. Succession ‘is the biggest risk to Apple’s story,’ says Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster. Yet, while the promotion would appear to bolster Cook’s position as a front-runner, it by no means seals the deal,” Hesseldahl and Burrows write. “First of all, there’s no indication that Jobs is giving any thought to leaving. ‘As the head of a public company, Steve has a fiduciary responsibility to think about having a succession plan,’ says Creative Strategies analyst Tim Bajarin, a longtime Apple observer. ‘But Steve isn’t going to retire for a long time. He loves what he’s doing, and barring a major problem, I don’t seem him stepping down now or anytime in the near future.'”

Hesseldahl and Burrows write, “What’s more, Jobs is a tough act to follow. ‘They have the most charismatic leader in the business world, and Steve Jobs is Apple,’ says Munster. ‘When he wasn’t there, Apple had a lot of problems. You can’t find a successor to Steve Jobs. There’s no one that could replace him, within the company…. It’s not what Apple is thinking. It’s what does Steve think.'”

Full article here.

Advertisements:
The New iPod with Video.  The ultimate music + video experience on the go.  Buy it now at the Apple Store. From $299. Free shipping.
The New iMac G5 – Built-in iSight camera and remote control with Front Row media experience. From $1299. Free shipping.
Our best hopes are anti-aging medical breakthroughs and/or cloning. Make him live 200 years or figure out a way to download the contents of his brain, clone him, and upload to the blank slate. No offense to Tim Cook, but we still like Jonathan Ive, he’s our dark horse; it’s a charisma thing. No matter what, we hope Steve Jobs stays Apple’s CEO for decades more, he’s as irreplaceable as they come.

Related articles:
What happens when Steve Jobs dies? – August 20, 2003

32 Comments

  1. So true. Steve Jobs is Apple.

    Apple needs to resolve this ASAP. Steve Jobs needs to start grooming someone. He’s got plenty left in the tank but he could die tomorrow and Apple would go down the tubes. The company has always struggled without him. SJ’s shoes are hard to fill indeed.

    Jonathan Ive….please. He is no biz man. He is an industrial designer ( a great one at that)

    Bring back The Diesel baby!!

  2. In a TIME article in 1998 I think when he was named CEO of Apple again, he, and I quote said “I will not be here in 10 years.” I don’t think that is true anymore, and I hope it’s not either, but I do remember reading that quote from SJ himself …

  3. And whenever he’s on stage debuting a new iPod, he’d just hold it in one hand like he does with those BK sandwiches, and then do that magical introductory hand-wave with the other hand. All with that pasted-on smile.

    People would swoon over everything he announces. After all, “It’s good to be the king!”

  4. Larry Ellison would make an interesting job of it, but he’s even older than Steve.

    Jonathon Ive isn’t probably the best choice. You need someone with vision, which is something really rare (does Mr. Ive have that?) You also probably need to be a total bastard and contradictorily a suck-up in order to thrust that vision forward and onto others. I don’t think Mr. Ive is like that. He just seems too nice to me.

  5. “but he could die tomorrow and Apple would go down the tubes. The company has always struggled without him.”

    I don’t think this statement is so true. The Apple of today is not the Apple of the 90s. Apple is comprised of brilliant people these days — people focused on great products and innovation rather than the Apple’s “position in the market.”

    In the 90s, tech companies’ primary focus was shareholders and investors. Apple’s gotten back to innovation, and shareholders and investors are better for the ride. Maybe other tech companies today should rethink their “position in the market,” embrace innovation, and be confident with slow, gradual growth.

  6. This entire Ive idea was contrived by MDN, and has absolutely no merit.

    Take a look at the man’s career. Strong design don’t make you a prime candiate for heading up a multi billion dollar global company.

    Only an ass would think Ive should be the next guy.

  7. Sure you can talk Cook or Ive or Schiller or Cleary, but keep this in mind. Steve is but a mere 50. He’s got the potential to ride this wave for another two decades yet. All of those names could be retired from Apple or have moved on to run other companies by the time Steve does retire.

    Steve’s eventual successor (assuming the board doesn’t look for outside star talent) could well be someone who is in college today, it could be the lowest peon in Apple’s mail room (don’t knock it, for the politically minded upwardly mobile go-getter the mailroom is a good place to start as you get to know everyone in the company), or it could be the chief of some product line that no one has imagined, is years away from release, but is so cool it will make the iPod look like a loser.

    Steve Jobs is to Apple as Mick Jagger is to the Rolling Stones, he’s an incredibly tough act to follow, but not an impossible or irreplaceable one. And I think y’all are looking at the wrong generation of talent to take his place.

  8. i doubt it will be tim cook, like i doubt it will be phill schiller either. remeber steve’s assessment of microsodf’s current malaise. a paraphrase: when the salesman is running the company, its the beginning of the end.

    i doubt steve jobs will let a “salesman” run apple when he is gone. i agree that it will be a product person – someone to carry the torch of innovation. Ive truly seems like a front runner to me. remember, steve was a product/vision guy – not a salesguy (alhough he could sell AC’s to eskimos).

  9. << Apple needs to resolve this ASAP. >>

    And just what do you propose they do to resolve it ASAP? The key is the Board of Directors. Remember, during all of the dark years the Apple Board was virtually unchanged. The Board provides continuity. When Jobs came back he convinced the Board to take a hike. Today, Apple’s Board is one of the most competent around.

    The Board will seek and select a successor to Jobs. It is up to them to select a person of vision, with the communications skills to energize the company and the market. If Jobs hasn’t been hit by a bus, he will be a big part of that process, but he shouldn’t dominate it. People never pick a successor that may prove better than they had been.

    My only concern regarding a successor to Jobs is the timing. Should something occur within the next two years, it could set Apple’s locomotive back a step or two. After that the engine will be running with so much momentum, that at worst, the transition will be prefunctory.

    Is Cook the man for the job? I don’t know, although at this poin, I don’t think he is. We know nothing of his vision, or his abilities to communicate it. For all we know, Cook could be an extremely effective manager of someone else’s vision. I’ll wager this though. If Cook isn’t selected, he will leave Apple.

  10. Chunky Monkey wrote:

    <i>I vote for the King.

    <i>You know, the Burger King king. That constant smile is bound to piss off every one of his competitors.<i>

    Yes, you might piss off the competitors, but you would probably scare away all the customers at the same time. Can you imagine the King giving a keynote address? Creepy.

    MDN word: real As in Keeping it real with the King.

  11. you people dont know this yet so i am breaking the news to you right now. Steve Jobs can not die nor retire. He is the first bionic man.. He runs on a pair of D batteries… so as long as duracell is around so will stevey

  12. I think for start SJ should let some give keynote next event.
    Because Sj = Apple is very strong image for now.

    Hope not ruin Apple stock ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />

  13. Yes, you might piss off the competitors, but you would probably scare away all the customers at the same time. Can you imagine the King giving a keynote address? Creepy.

    MDN word: real As in Keeping it real with the King.

    I don’t know. I LOVE the King. He’s a brilliant marketing icon. And that smile is killer.

    Plus I love seeing him pick off passes and return them for touchdowns.

  14. Jobs hasn’t an MBA, degree..and so he learned about business…at Apple.

    So why might Jonathan Ive not do the same?

    Whethe J has got the singlemindedness, roundedness, charisma, forcefullness and all theother characteristics that SJ has is another matter.

    But then you might only find a true replacement for SJ like the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama’s. The next SJ may be being born now in a Buenos Aires ghetto for all we know.

  15. When Steve steps down, I fear that will be the end. So I plan to buy the biggest, baddest, fastest Mac I can find just after Steves announcement. At least that way I can get a good 5 more years of enjoyable computer use.

  16. Apple will survive Steve’s departure, when it happens. The organization he has built will remain strong. Apple is more than Steve Jobs, even though he is such an amazing leader. I don’t see him leaving soon. I believe he is having way too much fun.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.