Mossberg: Every mainstream consumer doing typical tasks should consider Apple Mac

“It’s time for my annual fall buyer’s guide to desktop computers, and this fall, I’m going to focus on what kind of PC Windows buyers should be considering if they want to run Microsoft’s next version of Windows, called Vista,” Walter S. Mossberg writes for The Wall Street Journal.

Before launching into the hardware for Vista, Mossberg mentions, “You also won’t have to worry about Vista if you buy one of Apple Computer’s Macintosh computers, which don’t run Windows. Every mainstream consumer doing typical tasks should consider the Mac. Its operating system, called Tiger, is better and much more secure than Windows XP, and already contains most of the key features promised for Vista.”

Full article here.

Advertisement: The New iMac G5 – Built-in iSight camera and Apple Remote with Front Row media experience. From $1299. Free shipping.

Related MacDailyNews articles:
Enderle expects black Apple Macs to debut on Wednesday, not convinced of video iPod debut – October 10, 2005 (MDN Take includes: “Almost any ‘regular’ personal computer user who wants a reliable machine that can surf the Web, email, manage music, photos, word-process, do their finances, edit home movies, chat, keep track of their calendars, and much more would be far better off with any Mac OS X machine over any Windows XP machine.”)

22 Comments

  1. For this whole system he recommends you might as well buy a MAC. You will probably end up spending just as much if you buy a dell, then you have to get anti-virus and spam stuff. Macs might end up being the cheaper computers eventually.

  2. And here is a very telling point in Mossberg’s article:

    “Expect to spend $600 or more without a monitor, for a PC that can fully run Vista.”

    The assumption that current Macs are more expensive than PCs never takes into consideration that Tiger offers so much more than XP. It looks as if Vista will make the pricing of Macs even more favorable.

  3. In reply to the psoterr “Word”, above,

    You can go here:
    http://securityawareness.blogspot.com/2005/09/mad-as-hell-finale-recommendations-and.html

    and (especially) download the:
    “Part II: An Excel spreadsheet Winn’s Total Cost of Ownership Analysis”

    And then you can see for yourself that a Mac is cheaper to run!

    I sent this to an IT dept head of one of the places where I work — a geat way to let those peole “seee fo themselves” and take a look at the bottom line.

    (I like the Author’s Rants as well).

    – DG

  4. Software is certainly a consideration when deciding whether to buy a Mac or PC. The fact is, a Mac comes with all the software some people will ever need. Windows hardly comes with anything. I bought Virtual PC with XP Pro to do some testing on websites and I couldn’t believe what a barren wasteland it was with regards to software. I guess when you buy a PC some vendors load some stuff on there sometimes, but for anything decent you still have shell out extra money yourself. Every Mac comes with all the best of class software from Apple. It adds up.

  5. Thanks Gandalf.

    The case against wasting money on advertising a complex product like a Mac has been made many times here (by myself and others).

    The iPod lends itself to advertising; it is a relatively simple product.

    A Mac cannot be “sold” in 30 seconds. Thirty seconds won’t begin to scratch the surface of the product or its benefits. A purely abstract sales-pitch for the Mac (like the dancing silhouettes of the iPod), may do more harm than good. For years the foolish perception has been that the Mac was not a “serious business machine.”

    Apple is wise to let the great reviews, word-of-mouth, Apple retail stores, and the iPod do advertising for them.

    As much as they may need a tax write-off (which is all Mac advertising will accomplish), I would rather Apple continue to roll their profits back into R&D. The Mac is about to take a technological step backward (or sideways, AT BEST) with the transition to Intel. Apple can’t afford to screw-up and make matters any worse. Use the money wisely…

  6. Actually, advertising for the Mac PLATFORM is do-able. Certainly everyone has seen those idiotic Microsoft commercials with the kid talks about how they wrote a book using Microsoft windows software. It wouldn’t be difficult, in a 20 or 30-second commercial, to do a general Mac advocacy commercial. It could build upon the popularity of the iPod, drawing the connection to other Apple products, and simply remind people that “The company that brought you your wonderful iPod also brings wonderful computers.” Or something like that. They could even capitalize on the virus-free characteristics by having someone using another kind of player and a PC having a cold and having trouble with their computer, while the Mac and iPod user is healthy … no sniffles. ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.