Hysteria over iPod nano manufacturing blip proves Apple is not a company – it is a religion

“In space, no one can hear you scream. In cyberspace it is a different matter. After weeks of tussle, one little website has forced the mighty Apple to acknowledge a problem with its iPod Nanos, the rinky-dink music player thinner than a pencil that can hold 1000 songs,” Alison Rowat reports for The Herald. “[Buyers of the iPod nano, which] has been flying off the shelves… had complained about cracked screens and scratches. Apple says the problem only affects a tiny proportion of the stock and has offered free replacements.”

MacDailyNews Note: In the U.S., at least, “rinky-dink” means “old-fashioned, amateurish, or shoddy.” By reading Rowat’s entire piece, it is clear that she didn’t mean that definition to apply to iPod nano. We’re pretty sure that she meant “tiny.” Also, we’re not so sure that one tiny website forced Apple to do anything they weren’t already planning to do. A manufacturing defect in a batch of products is a quality control issue that any reputable company would take care of sans online hysteria. Apple is different, as Rowan attempts to explain.

Rowat writes, “Just an everyday story of a manufacturing blip. It would be, if Apple was an everyday company with everyday customers. That, however, is like saying the Beatles were a fairly popular beat combo. To many of its followers, Apple is not a company: it is a religion… Not that the followers of Apple should be tarred with the same brush as the members of such cults, or “new religious movements” as they, and their lawyers, like to call them. But Apple-heads (and I confess to being one) do have some things in common with cult members.”

Rowan writes, “The promise of free [iPod nano] replacements has restored peace in Mac paradise… Elsewhere in the blogosphere, some unhappiness remains, particularly over Apple’s advice that anyone worried about scratches on their [iPod nano] should buy a special case. It looks as though the apple of innocence about Apple might have been eaten. Still, when a religion acquires its doubters, it truly has arrived.”

Full article here.

Advertisement: Apple iPod nano. 1,000 songs. Impossibly small. From $199. Free shipping.

Related articles:
Apple iPods have always been far too scratchable, protective cases required to keep iPods pristine – September 30, 2005
The Motley Fool: Apple did the right thing in quickly addressing cracked iPod nano screens – September 28, 2005
Apple shares continue slide on iPod nano screen issues – September 28, 2005
Ars Technica: ‘Matthew Peterson, public avenger’ – September 28, 2005
Apple shares fall on iPod nano screen issues – September 28, 2005
Much-ballyhooed iPod nano screen concerns ‘a real but minor issue’ – September 28, 2005
Apple replaces iPod nano cracked screens; handful of units affected, WSJ: ‘barrage of complaints’ – September 28, 2005
Apple responds to iPod nano screen issues – September 27, 2005
iPod nano ‘screen issues’ really just FUD? – September 26, 2005
flawedmusicplayer.com website alleging iPod nano ‘screen flaws’ hosted on Apple’s .Mac – September 26, 2005
SiliconValley.com editor: ‘The iPod nano is fast becoming Apple’s next Cube’ – September 26, 2005
Alleged problems surfacing with Apple iPod Nano screen – September 26, 2005
Site reports iPod nano screen failures – September 23, 2005
Thurrott: Apple iPod nano is almost perfect – September 23, 2005
Inside Apple’s iPod nano; how healthy are Apple’s margins? – September 22, 2005
CNET iPod nano review: ‘Sets new standards, stretches boundaries of tech, Apple’s done it again’ – September 16, 2005
The New York Times’ Pogue states iPod’s Law: the impossible is possible – September 14, 2005
Associated Press praises Apple iPod nano, takes swipe at Microsoft WMA-based also-ran music services – September 14, 2005
Apple’s music competition having tough time and the iPod nano won’t help them – September 14, 2005
One of big stars at Microsoft’s PDC show: Apple’s iPod nano; Microsoft reps ‘in awe’ – September 14, 2005
Piper Jaffray: Apple seeing high demand for iPod nano – September 14, 2005
Australian IT: Apple iPod nano ‘a little bar of techno-joy’ – September 14, 2005
Apple iPod nano takes a beating and keeps on beating – September 12, 2005
Apple’s iPod nano: The ‘thin lady’ sings unwelcome iTune to competitors – September 09, 2005
Hands on with Apple iPod nano – September 09, 2005
Mossberg: Apple iPod nano ‘beautiful, incredibly thin, and exceeds Apple’s performance specs’ – September 08, 2005
Apple’s iPod nano will make competitors whimper, Motorola’s ROKR inexplicably bland – September 07, 2005
Tech pundit Enderle: ‘iPod Nano is a hit,’ Motorola ROKR ‘simply doesn’t have enough Apple in it’ – September 07, 2005
Jupiter analyst Gartenberg: ‘the market is going to go for Apple iPod nano in a big way’ – September 07, 2005
Analyst: iPod nano ‘could be Apple’s next home run’ – September 07, 2005
Video of Steve Jobs introducing iPod nano, ROKR iTunes phone now available online – September 07, 2005
Apple’s Steve Jobs predicts ultra-thin iPod nano ‘will become the highest volume iPod in the world’ – September 07, 2005
Apple’s iPod nano will make competitors whimper, Motorola’s ROKR inexplicably bland – September 07, 2005
Apple introduces iPod nano – September 07, 2005

29 Comments

  1. Again for those who don’t get it – the scratch complaints are not about the body of the nano, it’s the scratching on the screen, which is so bad as to make the screen partially unreadable.

    I carry my 20GB iPod in my pocket with change and two sets of keys and a phone and whatever else I happen to need to lug around in a day. The body is scratched to hell and I don’t care. The screen has scratches, but they don’t obscure readability at all, so I have not (and am not) complained about it. The nano issue is DIFFERENT. For whatever reason — usage patterns, thickness, I don’t know. But it needs to be acknowledged and corrected.

  2. Apple have just got to think a bit more proactively. Many people who will buy ipods, due to sale volume, are going to be naive and unsophisticated users.

    All Apple has to do is package some clear adhesive stickers like those you can buy from a variety of manufacturers, and warn people to stick them on.

    Problem solved.

    They naturally should also warn people to buy a cover, but the adhesive strips will certainly do the job in the short term.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.