TrustedReviews: After using Mac OS X Tiger ‘going back to Windows XP is something of a joke at best’

“The changes that have been made to [Apple’s Mac OS X] 10.4 [Tiger] are certainly sufficient to warrant an upgrade. The speed improvements offered by the new graphics rendering engine can give a new lease of life to some older Macs, and if nothing else, Tiger offers better system performance for a one-off fee,” Will Harris writes for TrustedReviews.com.

“The technology behind Spotlight is incredible. While the Windows team at Microsoft has spent the last few years talking up the desktop search facility of Longhorn, Apple has had its head down actually implementing its own version. It’s better, faster, more efficient and indexes more types of content than Google Desktop Search, and the added benefit of Smart Folders means that it can potentially alter the way you work drastically,” Harris writes.

“Dashboard is just the latest in a number of UI improvements that make OSX so much easier and more efficient to use than Windows XP. For many Mac users, going back to XP is something of a joke at best – or at worst, a thoroughly frustrating user experience that one only endures in order to play some decent games,” Harris writes.

“Because for all the improvements that Apple has made to OSX, it loses out to Windows in two areas. The first is that the hardware simply isn’t as fast or as cheap as it should be. While the Mac Mini has made a decent dent in the budget computer sector, the PowerBooks and PowerMacs still offer less for your money than an equivalently specified PC. Secondly, an average consumer wants to play games – and while support for Apple has been getting better over recent years, it is still nowhere near as good as Windows. For most people, solely using an Apple wouldn’t be an option without a secondary machine – be it a console or a PC – for gaming on,” Harris writes.

“With that said, there’s little that’s bad to say about Tiger. Some may balk at the idea of £90 for a few upgrades and a new search feature, but there are so many intangibles – security improvements and the like – that will never been seen or understood by most consumers, that all-in-all, the new features add up to make Tiger a must-have for any Mac user,” Harris writes.

TrustedReviews’ grades (out of 10):
Features-10
Performance-9
Value-9
Overall-9

Full review here.

Related MacDailyNews articles:
Manually organize dinosaur Windows PCs while Mac users already have the future with Spotlight – May 18, 2005
The Butler Group: ‘Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger the best desktop operating system in the world to date’ – May 13, 2005
BBC News: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger ‘the most stable and reliable OS, well ahead of Windows XP’ – May 10, 2005
Windows users show strong curiosity about Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger – May 09, 2005
Windows tech writer Thurrott: ‘In many ways, Mac OS X Tiger is simply better than Windows’ – May 07, 2005
EarthWeb: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger is a ‘serious enterprise operating system, a pivotal release’ – May 06, 2005
BusinessWeek: ‘Tiger bolsters Mac OS X’s edge as the best personal-computer operating system’ – May 06, 2005
The Guardian: Mac OS X Tiger a powerful solution while Microsoft’s Longhorn remains on drawing board – May 06, 2005
Chicago Sun-Times: Mac OS X Tiger shows ‘there’s never been a more compelling time to switch to Mac’ – May 05, 2005
Dan Gillmor: ‘With Mac OS X Tiger, Apple is plainly in the lead today’ – May 05, 2005
Jupiter Research VP: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger ‘runs rings around Microsoft Windows’ – May 04, 2005
The Independent: Apple’s ‘faster, smarter, simpler’ Mac OS X Tiger ‘a must-have’ – May 04, 2005
Mac OS X Tiger review for a Windows PC audience finds Tiger’s ‘far, far better than Windows XP’ – May 03, 2005
Longhorn mentioned in nearly every Apple Mac OS X Tiger review to assuage Windows masses – May 02, 2005
Boston Herald: Mac OS X Tiger should compel Windows PC users to think about switching to Apple Mac – May 02, 2005
Mac OS X Tiger will likely improve performance of your Macintosh – April 30, 2005
PC World review gives Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger 4.5 stars out of 5 – April 30, 2005
Forrester analysts: Apple should advertise Mac OS X Tiger on television and in movie theaters – April 29, 2005
Ars Technica: Mac OS X Tiger ‘at least twice as significant as any single past update’ – April 28, 2005
BusinessWeek: ‘Tiger bolsters Mac OS X’s edge as the best personal-computer operating system around’ – April 28, 2005
Associated Press: Mac OS X Tiger ‘provides another excellent incentive to switch from Windows’ – April 28, 2005
Mossberg: Apple’s Tiger ‘the best, most advanced personal computer operating system on the market’ – April 28, 2005
InformationWeek columnist: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger ‘a compelling upgrade’ – April 28, 2005
NY Times: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger is the most secure, stable and satisfying OS on earth – April 28, 2005
Windows is weak, Longhorn will be cosmetic upgrade; Apple can deliver killer blow to Microsoft – April 27, 2005
Thurrott: ‘Longhorn is in complete disarray and in danger of collapsing under its own weight’ – April 27, 2005
Wired News: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger ‘full of welcome surprises’ – April 27, 2005
Thurrott: Longhorn ‘has the makings of a train wreck’ – April 26, 2005
Thurrott: Longhorn demos ‘unimpressive, fall short of graphical excellence found today in Mac OS X’ – April 26, 2005
Apple posts QuickTime movies of Mac OS X Tiger features in action – April 13, 2005

37 Comments

  1. Yup… Apple should have a “Get a new PSP3 with every purchase of a G5…” or something… That’d be cooler. Or even cooler if they worked 100x harder at getting games to run well on the mac.

  2. As a recent ‘Switcher’, I can say that the gaming comparison is key – I personnally think that Windows will be cannibalized by their own and other consoles – I am sick of trying to get DirectX to work – in fact my Media Center 2005 box won’t run DirectX anymore, so the console and my new PowerBook mean the end of the line for Windows upgrades on my entertainment machines and my small business work machine.

  3. I installed Google Desktop Search on a PC at work today. In a nutshell, it sucks compared to Spotlight. I considered MSN search but it quickly told me that my browser (Firefox) was not compatible. MS bites…

    Google Desktop Search still defaults to IE for preferences. The preferences are limited at best. I couldn’t find a hot key to select the Search Bar. It took forever to index. And it lacks the refinement of Spotlight.

    It’s a good thing that I only log about 20 minutes a week in the XP box.

  4. Tiger is beautiful, I use it for many hours at night. I really think it is a great operating system.

    But I use Windows XP Pro all day. I really like and am very productive using it (I am a designer and spend most of my time in Adobe Creative Suite 2). Definitely search is a weakness in Windows XP, but I use Yahoo Desktop Search, which is essentially a free version of X1. While not as good as Spotlight, I can get almost anything I need to get done using it.

    Why does it always have to be a war of the operating systems? Both have their strengths – I am much better off having a PC and a Mac than I would be having just one.

  5. “an average consumer wants to play games” – wow, for the first time in my life I’m not average. It seems like every other post: one says “Mac won’t make it because it’s not a serious business machine”, the next says “Mac won’t make it because it’s not a serious gaming machine”. Make your minds up! Me, I’m happy with a number-crunching, picture-editing, audio-recording machine. I don’t have time for games (and if I do, it’s outdoors, running around).

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.