Analyst: Apple ‘poised to witness customer base expansion in the forthcoming quarters’

In a research note published this morning, Analyst Keith Bachman of Banc of America Securities maintains his “neutral” rating on Apple Computer and mentions that “the company is poised to witness customer base expansion in the forthcoming quarters. The analyst expresses his concern, however, regarding Apple Computer’s limited presence in the low-end markets.” The company’s fundamentals remain healthy, Banc of America Securities adds. The target price is set to $35. Full article here.

In related news, analysts at Merrill Lynch yesterday reiterated their ‘buy’ rating on Apple Computer and raised their target price from $32 to $38.

18 Comments

  1. So this guys oppinion is what? He is too cheap to spend the money for a decent computer so he is neutral. The fundamentals remain healthy, so this means they know how to make money.

    Is his view of Apple an oxymoron?

    First post with something to say other than I am a loser. lol

  2. No, oldmacfan:
    There is no necessary conflict between a “neutral” rating and this analyst’s comment that Apple is poised to expand its customer base. He’s suggeting that the recent (large) run up in Apple’s stock price has already baked in an assumption that Apple’s customer base will expand to some extent. CURRENT prices usually reflect the market’s expectations for a company’s future, not just where the company is today. Given the relatively high price for Apple stock (for the current level of profit), he may be right. My sense, however, is that the market has only been optimistic about new successes with iPod and iTunes. If Apple really does start to expand its customer base in computing, I bet we’ll see another substantial bump up in the stock price.
    Gentlemen, and gentleladies, place your bets!!
    ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />

  3. oldmacfan,

    From his statement that Apple does sell inexpensive computers, how do you twist that into thinking that the guy himself is cheap.

    Mac fans make know great computers but in general they have the reasoning skills of an evangelical polemist.

  4. hopefully everyone remembers Jobs’ QA remarks stating that a few years ago they decided to focus on iPod/iTunes rather than expanding marketshare via cheap Macs.

    The reason is logical. One is a helluva lot easier and also alot more effective at helping the other.

    In other words.. iTunes pushes iPods, it spreads Apple style and ease-of-use to Windows users, it pushes Quicktime and even pushes AAC, stalling a Microsoft monopoly… it EVEN helps people find Macs.

    Add in some incredible things like the Airport Express, linking iTunes to a .mac account for iChat goodness(wait a few months for this one…) and the iPod in your car means Apple can really do well by selling $300 computers after all–they’re called iPods.

  5. Why does this particular financial analyst feel it necessary to “remain neutral” because Apple isn’t as interested in the “low-end” market as he feels they should be? Would he be equally “neutral” about the companies making the Maserati or the Lotus and chide them for their lack of direct competition with Ford or Honda? I know, I know, another car analogy, but it sure seems to me to fit in this case.

  6. What I am saying about the analyst is that his belief that Apple needs more cheap systems to compete for market share or even cheaper systems is bunk. I think his perception is askewed by his belief that profit is driven by cheap beige boxes.

    Apple doesn’t have the 256 shades of cheap beige boxes like Dell, and they don’t need to to compete. One inexpensive desktop and one laptop is enough.

    Apple makes it simple. Dell, doesn’t.

    It is my belief that Dell only hurts their long term customer base, by selling the cheap stuff, and when the cycle of people needing to replace their aging cheap beige box comes around again they will be less likely to buy from Dell again.

  7. It would be cool to see Apple’s market share expand a bit. And the best thing would be that it would be expanding because it is better, not due to business shenanigans on Bill Gates part or just to save a few bucks.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.