Apple CEO Steve Jobs says analysts should stop worrying about Mac market share and focus on profits

“Steve Jobs says analysts should stop worrying about market share and focus on profits… Apple’s Macintosh computers have long been considered more elegant, easy-to-use, and innovative than their Microsoft Windows and Intel rivals. Yet Apple’s market share has slipped inexorably. It dropped from 9.4% in 1993 to just 3% in 1997, the year Jobs was rehired to run the company, according to Gartner Inc. By then, most companies and consumers had already made the jump to Wintel, due to cheaper prices and a wider selection of software titles,” Peter Burroughs writes for BusinessWeek.

“[In 1997,] Jobs embarked on a plan to win back a point of market share each year. That would have been more than enough to deliver brisk revenue growth. But despite a series of impressive machines such as the iMac and the 17-inch PowerBook G4 laptop, and a pricey ‘Switcher’ TV ad campaign to win converts, Jobs has been unable to stop the bleeding,” Burroughs writes. “According to Gartner’s preliminary market-share data, Apple held just 1.8% of the worldwide PC market in the fourth quarter of 2003. And some think Apple’s share will fall further, if it can’t keep pace with surging overall PC demand. Salomon Smith Barney analyst Rich Gardner expects Apple to post PC unit growth of 6% in 2004 this year, vs. 11% for the entire PC industry. One reason is price. Gardner says the average price of a Mac is $900, although half of PC buyers now spend less than $600.”

“That sounds awful, but it might not be so bad — if Apple can maintain its success with the iPod, and follow up with other non-Mac products (the iPod works with the Mac as well as with Wintel PCs),” Burroughs writes. “…the Mac is currently enjoying a growth spurt. Sales grew 12% during the quarter (iPod sales grew 238%, by comparison, but off a smaller base). The sleek PowerBook laptops remain hot items. Sales of higher-end PowerMacs — used by publishers, ad agencies, and the like — are getting a lift from the economic rebound. Some evidence even points to Apple turning around its long decline in the education market. In a survey of school districts, market researcher Quality Education Data found that 30% plan to buy Macs this year, up from 21% in 2003. And brisk sales of the latest upgrade of Mac OS X, called Panther, suggest that many Mac customers are planning on sticking around.”

“[Jobs] wouldn’t mind if those analysts would start measuring the Mac by the profits it produces, rather than by its market share. ‘We’ve got 25 million customers that want the best computers in the world. If our market share grows, we’re thrilled. But we’ve held our own, while our rivals were losing hundreds of millions of dollars a year,’ he says. ‘We’re in pretty good shape,'” Burroughs writes.

Full article here.

33 Comments

  1. Wow, someone who actually has a brain writing about Apple’s market share? I’m shocked. I still don’t understand why market share has taken precedence over profits. Maybe a few people on Wall Street will see this and rethink things a little.

    FP!

  2. Good article. It always confused simpletons to see Apple market share shrink – hence quick to predict its doom – and still combine that with Apple being the one of the two only PC makers in the black.

    I repeat myself but simpletons should really try hard and realize that thinking of Apple as a doomed company is equivalent to believing Porsche will soon disappear because Volvo has doubled its market share of heavy trucks. It does not matter if Dell, Micron, etc. are selling 10 times more dumb terminals to corporations for their clerk to spend their daily slavery in their cubicles: it does not affect Apple’s market, revenues and profitability. Exactly as Volvo selling trucks has no effect whatsoever on potential Porsche owners.

  3. I think how the analysts think is as follows:

    Apple posts profit, good. In order for Apple to keep making a profit, they need to keep selling computers and stay competitive–this means equivalent/ported software needs to be found on Macs. If market share decreases, then software companies will be less likely to port their software. Rinse, repeat. In this sort of equation, market share is essential. The only problem I see with this view is that it doesn’t take into consideration the fact that the current base of users isn’t going to switch to PCs any time soon and said base is enough to keep MS Office and Adobe writing software for the Mac OS. This user base is increasing, not decreasing. It just isn’t increasing as quickly.

    -Joel

  4. Joel, spot on. I’ll add that if any of these software developers were going to make the jump, they would have used the increased development costs of porting to OSX as the excuse. Now that the codebase is essentially ported, the costs of maintainting a Mac version is only the cost of adding new features. So basically, providing we all carry on buying our software rather than stealing it like the majority of Windows users do, neither we nor the developers have anything to worry about.

  5. Steve is right about apple and profits, steve is wrong on marketshare. The world has moved to cheap windows that dont work well but they can go to any store in the world and buy titles for that Intel. You can no longer just walk into a store and buy anything Mac. Ill say it again for Steve, Steve clean up the allways held behind consumer line and get your product in places other then that apple store in Kaliifornia. In the whole state of South Carolina not one Apple store. Steve how the hell you going to sell a mac in S.Carolina when you dont have 1 store? and every Walmart,Sears,Staples etc has Pc’s and gobs of software to go with those pc’s. Steve do you here me? This is what is killing your market. happy anniversary. still waiting for a decent Imac G5.

  6. “no Apple”…

    You’re here on MacDailyNews.com, so I’m assuming your browser also has the ability to go to http://store.apple.com ? That’s closer than any retail Apple Store.

    And there are quite a few software titles there, too. Likely anything you would need.

    Simply because WalMart, Staples, etc, sells PCs… doesn’t mean you need to give up and buy one.

  7. touch and try before you buy, the problem with apple is the 97% of the population is wanting to walk into a store and buy and take home at that moment, not wait for weeks for a banged up product to roll off of Ace ventur’a Ups truck. Apple has the best software, and after they get that G5 in every product then the best hardware but still joe consumer never hears or see’s a Mac product in the state. You have to know Mac before you begin your search of where you can find one. In the Pc world you can stumble into them eveywhere. Joe consumer has decided today im getting that machine so he wanders into walmart and comes home with something other then Mac. over 10 years ago i bought my first Mac. I had wandered into a Walmart and spotted something that was above the fray and it was branded Apple. After doing a little research i knew Mac was the way and went back to that store and took home a new Mac from a local store. try doing that today. this is why marketshare sucks for Apple.

  8. My father had his own Hardware business and one of the things he use to tell my mom is you cant sell out of a empty store meaning you had to have that product on the shelf. Apple has to get that product on the shelf. They have the best stuff its just not on that shelf.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.