“Speaking to developers at its semiannual developer forum on Tuesday, Intel Corp. shed a few new details on its next-generation multi-core desktop processors, which are destined to turn up inside Apple’s first Intel-based Power Mac systems in the second half of the year. During a keynote presentation, Pat Gelsinger, Intel’s senior vice president and general manager of the Digital Enterprise Group, showcased ‘Conroe,’ a dual-core desktop processor based on the company’s new Core microarchitecture that can reduce power consumption by 40 percent while delivering greater than 40 percent improvements in computing performance,” Prince McLean reports for AppleInsider. “The chip, which is on track to begin volume shipments in the third quarter of 2006, is the most likely candidate to turn up in Apple’s Power Mac professional desktop systems late in the Summer.”
“Not coincidentally, Apple Computer also announced on Tuesday that it will hold its annual World Wide Developers Conference in the second half of the year, as opposed to late May or June as it has done in the past,” McLean reports. “The conference, set to kick-off on August 7th, is expected to offer Mac OS X developers their first look at the company’s next-generation operating system, Mac OS X 10.5 ‘Leopard.’ It’s also expected to yield the first public demonstrations of a Power Mac desktop computer utilizing Intel’s Conroe chip.”
Full article here.
Advertisements:
• Apple’s brand new iPod Hi-Fi speaker system. Home stereo. Reinvented. Available now for $349 with free shipping.
• Apple’s new Mac mini. Intel Core, up to 4 times faster. Starting at just $599. Free shipping.
• MacBook Pro. The first Mac notebook built upon Intel Core Duo with iLife ’06, Front Row and built-in iSight. Starting at $1999. Free shipping.
• iMac. Twice as amazing — Intel Core Duo, iLife ’06, Front Row media experience, Apple Remote, built-in iSight. Starting at $1299. Free shipping.
• iPod Radio Remote. Listen to FM radio on your iPod and control everything with a convenient wired remote. Just $49.
• iPod. 15,000 songs. 25,000 photos. 150 hours of video. The new iPod. 30GB and 60GB models start at just $299. Free shipping.
• Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.
Related MacDailyNews articles:
Apple to hold World Wide Developers Conference (WWDC 2006) in August – March 07, 2006
Intel to launch 64-bit Core Duo successor ‘Merom’ in September – March 07, 2006
Just get those babies in the box and start selling them! I want mine now!
and my g5 will slowly become old and obselite :'(
Andy yur g5 is already obsolite
Ahhh yes…we haven’t heard about ‘Leopard’ in a while…hmmm, maybe a release to coincide with astalaVista…but then again, maybe Apple can’t wait that long.
Isn’t Conroe a 64-bit processor? Or is it Merom? Having trouble keeping these straight.
Bottom line, does anyone know if the Intel-based Power Macs will still provide 64-bit processing?
Thanks!
The current quad cored G5 is faster than pretty much any other desktop computer. The new intel chips are going to need to be hella-fast to beat it.
I’m interested in a less expensive refurb Quad for my next computer later this year. It will be quite a while before I switch my desktop to an intel machine. My laptop is a different story. That’s getting switched on tax free weekend in August.
The current Quad should have the beating of Conroe.
I have been holding off buying the quad just in case conroe was going to be bitching but 40% improvement over current dual core pentiums is not earth shattering.
Merom and Conroe are both 64bit laptop and desktop respectively.
The interesting thing about these processors is the virtualisation technology that Leopard might take advantage of.
BTW I am switching from PC not because I am worried about virii or that I loathe M$ I think the Quad is the best value workstation around at the moment. I priced up a comparative PC and it came out far more expensive than the quad. Who would have guessed!
astalaVista
LOL please tell me you’re from a square state. There’s definitely an h in hasta la vista.
Merom is the 64 bit notebook processor. Conroe is the 64 bit desktop. Both are based on the new core microarchitecture, as is Yonah aka core solo and core duo.
I agree that they will have to be hella fast to beat the quad core G5, but I think they will do it because conroe chips will be a generation or two ahead of the G5’s depending on how you look at it. It is the forefront of intel’s progress while the G5 is quite a ways behind the best technology IBM is making. IBM designs for servers and then tailors the chips for desktops later, which is what makes them so awesome in the high end. Intel’s design philosophy is now notebook based, as shown by the Core architecture coming out in Yonah first, and that Conroe (desktop) is based on Merom (laptop) processor. I think this is why the notebook and low end desktop intel macs will improve drastically while the high end will only get a boost by moving from the 5 year old technology of POWER4 to the brand new tech of Core. If Apple had stuck with IBM long enough to bring the advancements of subsequent POWER generations, 5 looks like it was pretty significant, to the apple desktop we could have seen some very great things.
OBSOLETE. I hope those of you who can’t spell are not native English speakers.
JohnE writes: “Ahhh yes…we haven’t heard about ‘Leopard’ in a while…hmmm, maybe a release to coincide with astalaVista…but then again, maybe Apple can’t wait that long.”
You are right on the money with that one!
Fat Mac,
On the high end Apple has always been a far better value, because that is what they were designed for. They never did a good job of dumbing the tech down to a price that people thought was low enough, so on the low end they didn’t do as well, if you can call anything Apple did before the mini, “low end.”
As many people on the boards have pointed out since the beginning of time, the correct plural of virus is viruses, not viri. It comes directly from Latin, but not all -us words in Latin are made plural by changing the ending to -i. It isn’t done for virus probably because viri is the plural for vir, or man, from which the English word virile is derived. Because of the way it was used in Latin, there is no record of the plural of virus in that langauge, so we use our English method of making plural a word that ends in s, adding es. Ergo, Viruses.
If you were to start talking about viruses in Latin, where you certainly wouldn’t use English rules, it still wouldn’t be viri. You would probably just change the pronunciation or possibly write virera or virora. We can’t be sure because rules in Latin are sometimes as broken and mangled as they are in English.
And the plural of fish is…fish…or fishes. It depends.
I absolutely want one, NOW. But I have a question. Does it have a Hemi?
The new 64 bit dual core processors will be around 2.3 Ghz and offer not much performance gain over the present 2.5 Ghz G5 dual cores in the PPC Quads.
Remember folks no Altivec in Intel processors, which means they may be quicker, but less productive on big jobs.
The G5 processor is still a monster chip and Intel is just catching up, so don’t expect any great jumps in processing power over what you see today.
The only benefit in waiting for Intel PowerMac at this time would be the option to run Windows programs under Darwine at native speeds, I would also wait until the BlueRay DVD burner is ready because you’ll only be able to buy one with a new Mac.
If your in the market now for a PowerMac, the Quad is the machine to get as it will run all present PPC software and future software with dual binaries.
http://appleintelfaq.com/
Also the Quad is fast enough to be able to process 1080p video without HDCP(TPA) copy protection hassards like your going to see in all future EFI based Mac’s.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70349-0.html?tw=wn_story_page_prev2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Computing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Firmware_Interface
Jay:
A Hemi? Don’t you mean a Hemus?
only if he wants two hemuses.
“We can’t be sure because rules in Latin are sometimes as broken and mangled as they are in English.”
I think, there4 I’m 5. I’m a virii.
Tiger has made little headway in the past year and that’s up against XP from 2001. Now Vista ships this year with a bundled Media Center, all the eye candy, and security improvements. Not to mention the fact that it will come pre-installed on every consumer & business PC in the world. And you all get “speakers” and designer cases. What’s Leopard again? Who cares.
Jay,
You don’t have many friendi, do you?
Just kidding. I took a year of latin myself, and appreciated your refresher course.
Apple is really pissed me off.
I had to reset my viPod and download almost 60GB all over a lousy USB2 connection.
It’s taking HOURS and HOURS!!
OH APPLE why has thou forsaken FIREWIRE?
Where is FIREWIRE 800 on MacBook Pro’s?
Don’t people realize USB2 is a inferior?
I guess this means Mac’s will be just PC’s.
Damm, still going.. and going…
*yawn* still going
*zzzzzzzz*
Conroe? I hope Apple is working on integrating Kentfield, which is the 4-core version. It would be sweet if the first Intel PowerMacs were a dual Kentfield monster with 8 cores of multi-processing power!
Applbites here is an interesting tidbit on the barefeats website.
http://www.barefeats.com/imcd.html
USB 2.0 is FASTER on the iMac Intel Core Duo than on the Quad-Core G5 Power Mac! One of our readers was pondering whether the speed of USB 2.0 might be improved on the Intel based Mac. So we ran some QuickBench tests using a Maxtor DiamondMax 10 and Wiebetech SuperDriveDock+ (USB2 + FW800). Here’s what we observed:
Quad-Core built-in USB2 = 11MB/s READ, 11MB/s WRITE
Quad-Core with Aaxeon USB2 card = 15MB/s READ, 11MB/s WRITE
iMac Intel Core Duo 2.0 built-in USB2 = 18MB/s READ, 14MB/s WRITE
(of course, FireWire is faster)
iMac Intel Core Duo 2.0 built-in FW400 = 39MB/s READ, 28MB/s WRITE
Quad-Core built-in FW800 = 58MB/s READ, 50MB/s WRITE