Cringley: Apple and Intel to merge; Steve Jobs finally beats Bill Gates
Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 12:49 PM ESTWhat's behind Apple's announcement that future Macs will use Intel processors "is so baffling and staggering that it isn't surprising that nobody has yet figured it out until now," Robert X. Cringely writes. "Apple and Intel are merging."
...Intel hates Microsoft. It hasn't always been that way, but in recent years Microsoft has abused its relationship with Intel and used AMD as a cudgel against Intel. Even worse, from Intel's standpoint Microsoft doesn't work hard enough to challenge its hardware. For Intel to keep growing, people have to replace their PCs more often and Microsoft's bloatware strategy just isn't making that happen, especially if they keep delaying Longhorn.
Enter Apple. This isn't a story about Intel gaining another three percent market share at the expense of IBM, it is about Intel taking back control of the desktop from Microsoft.
Intel is fed up with Microsoft. Microsoft has no innovation that drives what Intel must have, which is a use for more processing power. And when they did have one with the Xbox, they went elsewhere.
So Intel buys Apple and works with their OEMs to get products out in the market. The OEMs would love to be able to offer a higher margin product with better reliability than Microsoft. Intel/Apple enters the market just as Microsoft announces yet another delay in their next generation OS. By the way, the new Apple OS for the Intel Architecture has a compatibility mode with Windows (I'm just guessing on this one).
This scenario works well for everyone except Microsoft. If Intel was able to own the Mac OS and make it available to all the OEMs, it could break the back of Microsoft. And if they tuned the OS to take advantage of unique features that only Intel had, they would put AMD back in the box, too. Apple could return Intel to its traditional role of being where all the value was in the PC world. And Apple/Intel could easily extend this to the consumer electronics world. How much would it cost Intel to buy Apple? Not much. And if they paid in stock it would cost nothing at all since investors would drive shares through the roof on a huge swell of user enthusiasm.
That's the story as I see it unfolding. Steve Jobs finally beats Bill Gates. And with the sale of Apple to Intel, Steve accepts the position of CEO of the Pixar/Disney/Sony Media Company.
Much, much more in the full article here.
Related MacDailyNews articles:
Mossberg: Switch to Intel will strengthen Apple and the Mac - June 08, 2005
Apple's Intel shift could result in market share gain - June 08, 2005
Why buy a Dell when Apple 'Macintel' computers will run both Mac OS X and Windows? - June 08, 2005
Windows users who try Apple's Mac OS X Tiger might not want to go back - June 07, 2005
= 
Intel buy Apple?
I don't think so. Besides that fact that Jobs would never allow it, chips are becomming a commodity.
With $6 billion in reserves, Apple could buy a controlling interest in Intel easily without a Apple stock being involved.