MacDailyNews - Where Mac news comes first

ALLLLLLLLLLRRRRIIIIIIGGGGGHHHHHHTTTTTT !!!!!!!!!!!!!

is not the last 90 days.

But analysts have been saying that iPod sales didn't really taper off much after the holidays, so the last SIXTY days have probably been good.

I'm just getting excited about what all this revenue is likely to mean for future developments!

I feel like a freak'n pioneer: I've had one for almost 4 years. Our immediate family has 3. Oh, wait...I am a pioneer, I have been using Apple products without interruption since 1979.

Zac

(brought to you by the word history, as in I have a long history with Apple.)

Analyst - Analysts, they make their living out of looking in a Crystal globe ..

umm, am i'm the only one who thinks hitting critical mass is not a good thing. i mean, where does apple go from here if it has hit critical mass?

My favorite (incorrect) quote from the article:
"[iPod Shuffles] offer users virtually no control over which songs are played; it downloads 1,000 random songs from its owner's computer and plays them in a random order."

He's off by a factor of 10, but the idea of a 1,000 song player with no screen strikes me as humorous.

Yes, you are the only one who thinks that--D*LT.
Sorry, but that was incredibly stupid...

My biggest complaint with this article is that Dr. Chuck Coletta "a professor of popular culture" at a university, had never heard of an iPod until 6 months ago. By then, a good portion of the population had been inundated with the iPod. If he's an expert in the field of pop culture, you'd think he'd maybe put in some due diligence and learn about what's popular.

Jimbo, that is an excellent point. Kind of hurts his credibility...

ivory tower academics with no concept of reality or what's happening in the outside world? surely it hasn't come to this...

It probably doesn't hurt that some of Apple's competition (e.g. Sony) has made the ridiculous decision to ADVERTISE FOR APPLE by using white earbuds on their own players. Sure, there may be a few people who don't want to pay for an iPod, yet want to appear to have one, but for the most part, I don't think people choose a player because of the white earbuds. It's the other way around. Why didn't Sony use a distinctive color for the PSP?

I don't particularly like wearing advertisements (or looking like all the other people on campus with bright white wires hanging from their ears), so I use dark non-Apple earbuds with my iPod.

You know, I have read articles before in the paper that concerned the company that I used to work for. It was weird because every one was just a little bit off - kinda right but not really hitting the nail on the head.

I think that was my first experience with knowing a subject intimately first and then reading it in the news papers. Up until then I pretty much accepted everything in the papers as more or less right and I think this is a common human tendency.

Now with Apple and the iPod I am again in a situation where I actually know more about what is going on concerning a subject than most of the reporters writing about it, and I am again struck with how often they are wrong. Sometimes you get a guy that hits the nail on the head but too often they really are just talking out their a$$es or regurgitating someone else's verbal flatulence.

This second experience really drove it home that I should be taking EVERYTHING that is reported with a large grain of salt. If my two experiences are any indication, 90% of what is in the paper is wrong in some way. I guess being from Iowa I still have a bit of the naivete to me. Guess i shoulda been from Missouri - the show me state.

So if we add an initiator, will it explode?

Jack A:

First you said this:

"Up until then I pretty much accepted everything in the papers as more or less right and I think this is a common human tendency."

And then you said this:

"If my two experiences are any indication, 90% of what is in the paper is wrong in some way."

Do you see that both statements are equally naive and uncritical? You provide only the vaguest information to slur an entire industry that works really hard (for the most part) to try to get it right. They are continually faced with people who dance around questions, who refuse to reveal non-critical information, and then turn around and say "the media have it wrong." Well, no freaking wonder.

To say that you know more about your industry than the media does *and* then to criticize them for not knowing as much as you do, O High And Mighty One, is disingenuous in the extreme.

Maybe you should tell us all where you work so we can go over there and kick the toilet brush out of *your* hand. Then you can tell us all how how feel about *that*.

I don't think anyone should give jounalists slack. It's called integrity and alot of journalists are whores for corporations monies. Real jounalists don't bend facts and they seem hard to find lately.

Actually Mac Yak, Jack A has it right. We were raised in a society that teaches the media is good because it isn't government controlled. (like China for example) We have come to trust and depend on the media because they have access to places and things that any single individual would not have.

Like Jack, I became very knowledgable in a certain subject area. Then I saw consumer reports saying that product x lacked certain features that it actually had, and then when 4 out of 5 of its top picks had been discontinued for almost a year, I became very cynical and critical of what most reports had to say. Years have past since then but the lesson learned, how did Jack A put it, oh yeah, Take most of what is being reported with a very large block of salt.

The experience of discovering that most reports (real news, product reviews, PR announcements and etc) are going to contain innaccuracies, bad research, and well, just plain old biased untruths cannot be an isolated thing. The people who recognize it, and wake up to smell the coffee now have the harder job of doing research and thinking for themselves rather than being led around by the so called experts or analists.

Mac Yak

I think you're being unfair and are quite wrong. I've had the same experience as Jack A.
I know the area of Berlin where I live (Kreuzberg) intimately and an article in the renowned magazine 'Der Spiegel' about Kreuzberg had glaring mistakes. I've experienced this sort of thing several times in my life - I'm fifty-seven.
It's common sense to be very sceptical about what you read or hear in the media.

Mac Yak,

Just because people aren't forthcoming or truthful to journalists does not excuse them from reporting errors. That is their job, to figure out what is true and what is not. And if it's not clear, then they should say so and not be so dogmatic (and wrong) in their articles.

Like Jack A, I have seen many times when reporters get the facts wrong. I'm not saying they are all lazy or disreputable, but simply that they are wrong. And now that more and more people have access to publishing, more and more articles are simply wrong.

My family of 6 has 5 iPods. That's a pretty good %!!! We've done our part.

If the iPod has reached 'critical mass' then Apple has one problem: how to make more iPods. There are only so many factories that make the hard drives that go into the device. 1.8" hard drive production must double or tripple over the next year.

The smaller 1" drives that are used in the iPod Mini have to increase in capacity so that entire music libraries could be loaded on them; 20 GB iPod Minis would be appealing upgrades for current 20 GB iPod owners. These repeat customers will be crucial for the iPod market to stabilise, much like repeat Mac buyers are for Apple computers.