MacDailyNews - Where Mac news comes first

That's a lot of chips.Have some fish with them.

Holy crap! Those numbers for chips boggle de dog mind.

No, seriously . . . for a minute there I thought I was reading a story about Star Jones' old junk food bill.

What?

Come onnnnn, I keed. I keed everyone. Even de once-grotesquely fat.

And de ugly.

Hey, it's what I do.

Imagine putting all them chips in one machine. The iUberMac.

Trying to get it where?

The numbers are not really that huge. Think about it for a second.

Assume for the first half of the year (through 1 July) Apple ships iPod nanos with the current 2 and 4 GB memories, and they ship in equal quantities. (I believe that more 4 GBs are sold than 2 GBs but let's be conservative.) Then assume Apple upgrades the line to 4 and 8 GB nanos on 1 July and ships equal numbers of each for the rest of the year.

This comes to only 8.9 million iPod nanos for all the memory they intend to buy from Hynix. I expect Apple to sell significantly more than just 8.9 million nanos this year -- way more.

Of course Apple has several other sources of memory, including the Intel-Micron deal mentioned by MDN, but there is the iPod shuffle too. There may even be other NAND memory based systems coming out before the end of the year.

The bottom line as I see it... these numbers are right in line with what I would expect -- for this year at least.

The most interesting part is the statement "or buy at least 20 percent of the company's NAND production, whichever is larger". This would imply to me that Apple is not concerned about how many chips Hynix can make. Apple expects to be able to sell enough systems to buy at least 20% of whatever Hynix makes -- no matter how far Hynix ramps up production (plus the commitments to its other vendors).

That's a pretty bold prediction (and commitment) because Hynix could arrange for financing to put in a completely new fab line and double or triple production within the next 3.75 years.

I believe the first flash-memory based Apple Pro notebooks will be introduced this year
- probably at the end of the year - and they'll have about 30GB of memory.

[They might even have an additional built-in hard disk as a backup.]

With the next generation of Core Duo processors, they'll be amazingly fast.

@ Shadowself
Considering how for the past 3 pre-Christmas shopping periods Apple has been struggling to meet worldwide iPod demand despite selling 14.5million iPods in the run up to Christmas last year it would be nice to think Apple might actually be able to meet world wide iPod demand for once in the history of the iPod. So maybe 40million+ iPods to be sold worldwide in the run-up to Christmas 2006 ontop of the iPods sold during the year.

Who cares?

I want MacDude.

in any case, stfu

Girl pees on iPod nano, thinking it's a pregnancy test

http://bemmu.blogspot.com/2006/03/girl-pees-on-ipod-nano-thinking-its.html

Apple does not want parts availability to get in the way of product sales. They are making damn sure they've got chips to build gadgets with.

It would not be beyond reason for an Apple competitor to gobble up mass quantities to impair Apple's ability to deliver product and cause the iPod to falter in the market place.

Even if a competitor didn't have an immediate need for the chips they could buy them to constrain Apple, dump the chips at discount prices later and write-down the loss as part of the cost to dethrone the iPod.

Kudos to Apple for securing good component availability in advance.

If you look up Apple's Cash position you'll notice they had made a $750 Million prepyment to Smasung for flash memory. Apple is definetly locking up as much of the NAND production as they can.

Apple stock was headed down to under $55 if it wasnt for the news, most buyers only got in because the stock was going to close " POSITIVE" for the first time in days, so they were SHORT TERM buyers, they bought because they knew more buyers would come in the next day, and they did yesterday, and today is friday, short termers usually dont like staying in stocks during the weekends. Which means there is going to be a huge sell off today.

And noone should count on apple releasing something cool on its 30th birthday, it'll be another ipod-wifi dissapointment style decline next week. because everyone is counting on it.

Dear APPLE = SELL SELL SELL!!

If you could spell I might take you seriously.
Loser.

A SOMEWHAT under discussed option is that an "iControl" remote with a display screen, iPod-esq control wheel, etc would need to have some Flash memory for it's embedded OS. A HD would be impractical because it (1) woudln't need to store tons of data, (2) would take more power to operate, (3) would be heavier, and (4) would have to spin up.

Something more to buy by Apple: buy BMG, part of Sony BMG!

Le groupe allemand de médias Bertelsmann envisage de céder sa participation de 50 % dans l'éditeur musical Sony BMG ainsi que sa filiale à 100 % BMG Music Publishing pour une valeur totale de 2 milliards d'euros, selon des informations parues lundi 27 mars dans Les Echos et le Financial Times (FT). Un porte-parole du groupe a refusé tout commentaire. Selon le FT, l'opération permettrait au groupe, géant allemand des médias et de l'édition, de financer le rachat de la participation de 25 % à son capital du belge Groupe Bruxelles Lambert (GBL), qui a annoncé en janvier son intention d'introduire ses titres en Bourse.