MacDailyNews - Where Mac news comes first

 MacDailyNews Poll

Deal of the Day

5 Day Most Commented

Opinion Archive

Current Headlines

Latest Joy of Tech

  • Latest Joy of Tech!

MacNN

AppleInsider

Macworld UK

TUAW

MacRumors

Yahoo! Finance AAPL

iTunes Top 10 Albums

Mac OS X Downloads

Sat, Nov 21, 2009 - 06:18 AM EST  —  AAPL: 199.92 (-0.59, -0.29%)  |  NASDAQ: 2146.04 (-10.78, -0.5%)

Why does Windows still suck and why isn’t everyone on a Mac?
Friday, February 04, 2005 - 11:35 AM EST

"Are you using a PC? You probably have spyware. The McAfee site claims a whopping 91 percent of PCs are infected. As every Windows user knows, PCs are ever waging a losing battle with a stunningly vicious array of malware and worms and viruses, all aimed at exploiting one of about ten thousand security flaws and holes in Microsoft Windows,' Mark Morford writes for The San Francisco Gate.

Morford writes, "Here, then, is my big obvious question: Why the hell do people put up with this? Why is there not some massive revolt, some huge insurrection against Microsoft? Why is there not a huge contingent of furious users stomping up to Seattle with torches and scythes and crowbars, demanding the Windows Frankenstein monster be sacrificed at the altar of decent functionality and an elegant user interface?

"There is nothing else like this phenomenon in the entire consumer culture. If anything else performed as horribly as Windows, and on such a global scale, consumers would scream bloody murder and demand their money back and there would be some sort of investigation, class-action litigation, a demand for Bill Gates' cute little geeky head on a platter," Morford writes. "And with very few exceptions, every Mac owner everywhere on the planet simply looks at all this viral chaos and spyware noise and Microsoft apologia and shrugs. And smiles. And pretty much ignores it all outright, and gets back to work."

Morford writes, "It's very simple. The Mac really has few, if any, known viruses or major debilitating anything, no spyware and no Trojans and no worms, and sure I've been affected by a couple e-mail bugs over the years, but those were mostly related to my mail server and ISP. For the most part and for all intents and purposes, Macs are immune. Period."

"I know of what I speak. I am not a novice. I've been using Macs almost daily for 15 years. I am online upward of 10-12 hours a day. I run multiple Net-connected programs at all times. I receive upward of 500 e-mails a day, much of it nasty spam that often comes with weird indecipherable attachments that try, in vain, to infiltrate my machine. My Mac just shrugs them off and keeps working perfectly. I dump them all in the trash and never look back," Morford writes. "Perhaps there is something I'm missing. Maybe there's something I don't understand as to why there is not a massive rush of consumers and IT managers to dump PCs in favor of Macs (or even Linux OS). Surely thousands (millions?) of work-hours have been lost nationwide as tech departments spend untold months debugging and installing PC virus protections and keeping abreast of the latest and greatest worm to come down the pike, all due to Microsoft's lousy software."

"Am I being unfair? Maybe. Hell, I'm sure Windows has its gnarled and wary defenders, war-torn and battle-tested folk who still insist that, because there's more software available for the Windows OS, it's somehow superior -- though I challenge them to name one significant, common activity the Mac can't do as well as, if not better than, PCs," Morford writes. "For 97 percent of users in the world, Macs would be a more elegant and intuitive and appealing solution. Period."

There's much, much more bounty in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Know a Windows user who's frustrated and thinking about their options? Send them the link to Morford's beautiful article!

Bookmark and Share

Always -- Free ground shipping with orders over $50 at the Apple Store.

Reader Feedback: = registered.
Unregistered users: Feedback from multiple usernames are subject to deletion. Off-topic and posts from suspected astroturfers will be removed.

Feb 07, 05 - 10:15 am Comment from: Seahawk

And for the nth time, whenever there will be a virus for OS X it will have to be one that overcomes the user. That is, all the proof of concepts that came around OS X last year are way silly in that they are just that: proof of concept. If a virus NEEDS the user to click few times and type the password in order to a) get installed, b) start operations, c) spread it is a JOKE, not a virus.

To be harmful it has to work in an automatic way, fully unconstrained by the fact that there is a user at the keyboard. To do that it HAS to be fully a BSDUnix virus. BSDUnix has since long shut down - because of the contributions from OpenSource - all easy and evident way to do that. The easy and evident way that Windows abounds with, to understand each other.

Finding a new undiscovered hidden flaw to take full control of a BSDUnix platform is difficult: do not fool yourself that it has anything to do with market share. It has to do with the difficulty of the task and the script kiddies breaking havoc on Windows daily hands down and blind folded are pure and simply NOT UP TO THE TASK. Period.

Peace.

Feb 07, 05 - 10:23 am Comment from: Seahawk

trippah "Right now through, many people are as interested in uncovering holes in the Mac as much as they want a Mac."

If you were really into Mac computing you would know that actually there are A LOT of people interested in uncovering holes in Macs, there is an enormous trend of Linux and BSDUnix people contributing to the Bug Radar submission to Apple. A LOT. And these developers are interested more and more to use OS X in the same environment as any other Linux platform and/or BSDUnix and run on it the very same applications and software.

In case you are a Mac user, well do not fool yourself: the Mac is a Unix platform. It has more power users than Windows (no, corporate clerks do not count as power users). There is no more such a thing as "the Mac" concerning its innards: it is Unix and at WWDC you see as many Unix gurus around as at Linux conventions. At the last in SF, there were actually people attending BOTH conventions as they were one across the road to each other.

In case you are a Windows user, well you fool yourself already: I have no more to say in this case. Good luck.

Feb 07, 05 - 04:53 pm Comment from: Seahawk

I am an idiot

Feb 07, 05 - 04:55 pm Comment from: trippah

Yes you are.

Feb 09, 05 - 05:23 pm Comment from: Seahawk

trippah: you definitely are a Windows user.

UHAHAHAHAHAHAH what a sour loser. ROFLMAO.

Feb 16, 05 - 06:13 pm Comment from: e-bone

"For 97 percent of users in the world, Macs would be a more elegant and intuitive and appealing solution. Period."

Not to be cocky, but that is the whole reason why I use Windows. I guess I'm a "1 percenter".

There are many and varied tasks which I cannot perform on a Mac at all or not as easily. It's not Apple's fault, it's just that nobody has coded a Mac equivalent yet.

If your computing needs are not very esoteric, then I agree. But when are you Apple-heads going to stop self-congratulating yourselfs so much ?

Reader feedback page 1 of 2 pages:  1 2 >

Always -- Free ground shipping with orders over $50 at the Apple Store.

Add Your Feedback:

Register or Login

Name:

Email: (optional)

Emoticons | Allowed HTML Tags

Remember my info   Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the "MDN Magic Word" you see in the image below: