MacDailyNews - Where Mac news comes first

If the pad is as successful as Steve's hobby Apple TV, will it qualify for "changed the world" status?

Steve seems a lot more defensive than usual about the pad since the announcement. Is he worried or what?

Huh?!? How is Steve "more defensive"? Did you interview him, cause I don't think he has said a word about it publicly. Oh, you mean that internal Town Hall meeting where there's no actual record of what he said? We've already seen a bunch of people paraphrase what he said differently.

When will they stop comparing the iPad to the Kindle? That is like comparing a Rolls Royce to a golf cart.
There is no comparison. They are not in the same league. The have one minor similarity (ebook reading) and the iPad outshines the Kindle in that.

How about setting up a poll on MDN and asking how many of the readers of this site think they would get fired if their boss new how much time they spend here each working day. Just curious.

Feb 02, 10 - 12:59 pm Comment from: rsbell

It's funny how the Kindle was universally panned when it was released (and the 2nd generation was more of the same), but now that the iPad is announced, suddenly the Kindle is great.

It pains me to see the gymnastics some writers will go through to say something bad about Apple and the iPad.

It will be a success purely because the print and media industry have gotten tired of their hard work being sucked up by "Do no evil" empires without cash exchange. Amazon have been the first to feel the heat, others will follow in a domino cascade style building to a waterfall collapse. As publishers begin to realize monitory gains via the iPad, they will just a the recording industry did, wail over how much commission they are giving away, even though I suspect they have learnt that lesson by now.

Google had better brace themselves for a collision with an iceberg. Publishers will be able to reap advertising cash from magazines sold on the iPad, cash that will not come in via Google or even Apple but by their existing Ad. departments. Advertising agencies will change the way they create ads. as they will be published with a push of a button. Ads will be monitored for effectiveness as people click or not on them.

In conclusion, my prediction that the iPad was going to be apps driven has turned out to be 98% correct, thus negating the power of the browsers, very soon, browsers will become just another set of apps. The most used app will become the must have outlet for advertisers and thus the most lucrative and influencial.

Feb 02, 10 - 01:02 pm Comment from: almux

No way you can PRINT from this device means: you can't fool around with editors and writers rights. That could be sort of reassuring for the press and books busyness.

Feb 02, 10 - 01:02 pm Comment from: iPhoneEnvy

How about a poll on MDN asking how many of the readers of this site are annoyed by Idiot Trolls.... Just Curious..

@ Question: Are we already going to start abbreviating the iPad and call it "the pad"?

Why is the iPod touch called an iTouch?

I never hear anyone say iNano or iShuffle.

And are we so f%@#*ng lazy that we cannot put the upper and lower case letters in the proper place when we write iPod or iPod touch or iPad etc.? Not even the sellers of the products and accessories get it right. What a pathetic excuse for a schooling system we must have, or is it that nobody has any discipline anymore?

Feb 02, 10 - 01:07 pm Comment from: Spark

How many will dismiss this report because it aired on Fox News? The article was pretty "fair and balanced" in my opinion.

News flash: You'll need a printer, if you want to print. So no, you can't print directly from the iPad. (Just the kind of brilliant insight you'd expect from Fox "News!")

But if you have an app like Air Sharing Pro ($10), you can print from the device. Even on the iPhone, that app lets you import photos from your photos library, or select files from an iDisk, FTP site, your computer, or whatever. Then you can print to a printer. The only catch is that you have to have a Mac connected to the printer and have Printer Sharing turned on. But for everybody reading this site that doesn't seem like a big hassle.

Interesting if you can email a pdf, then printing is available via the recipient mac. However, Apple is good a kneecapping their new technology to not cannibalize their other products. For example, you KNOW there's the circuitry for a camera and voice input for phone usage as well already in the iPad.... and why no USB port? Each one of these gives update paths for the next versions.

Well it looks like we can see how iPhoneEnvy will have vote in the poll!!!

"What are the device's biggest limitations? If you want to import your digital camera photos directly into it, you'll need to buy a clunky-looking external adapter [and] there's no way to print from the device"

or you could just import them into iPhoto and sync.

Or you could use the Bump app to move your newly-taken pictures from your iPhone to your iPad.

Feb 02, 10 - 01:29 pm Comment from: Jubei

Don't worry about printing. Theres an app for that (soon).

The iPhone can print to a printer. Why wouldn't the iPad be able to?

@ Question

In this economy EVERYONE is worried. Jobs should especially worry about the self-imposed limitations - 3G price, bluetooth, camera. The disc space pricing seems to be the usual APPLE gouging of customers as well.

What I want to know, if Apple can produce something like this for $499, why does the iPhone cost so much? The company is between a rock and hard place with that hardware. They really can't unlock/unsubsidize the iPhone because ATT couldn't stand the hit and would drop it as a product.

"Apple is working on additional iPad features and capabilities that remain unannounced."

Is that so? Like what? Are you still imagining a camera? If there were features that were going to be on this thing don't you think Steve would have fully shown them off?

Feb 02, 10 - 01:39 pm Comment from: cptnkirk

There are definitely apps for printing and I have wireless printer.

I love wireless stuff since I have a MBP. I only need a cable to recharge.

Feb 02, 10 - 01:42 pm Comment from: cptnkirk

I think that the lack of print, though, is not a mistake. It's in the line of no floppy drive in the original iMacs.

It is paradigm changing!

Steve is looking at a world where iPads are ubiquitous and people use less or no paper at all. iPads are passed around for people to read. File-sharing is easy. Everything can be in the huge cloud they're building in North Carolina.

The iPhone can print to a printer using an app. I think the journalist here is saying that there isn't a native way of printing, since Apple hasn't announced that there is. I bet by the release date, though, there will be a system-wide way of printing from the iPad.

I don't know if I trust Harry McCracken, but I love his brother Phil.

we have to be able to print, and it would be nice to access thumb drives from the camera usb adapter too.

Add in MULTITASK please for Heaven's sake!

Feb 02, 10 - 02:33 pm Comment from: TigerCliff

The two things for me would be:
* Printing - wirelessly, of course, to Airport Express USB printer. And Apple could disable printing from iBooks. But it does *need* print... directions, Fandango tickets, etc. **I expect this will be enabled**
* Wireless syncing - this would be a major advantage for the "mom would love this device" crowd. If it can be configured to automatically backup and update the device... that would be cool. **I do not expect this anytime soon.**

I wonder if Print & Share will work with it...

Feb 02, 10 - 03:07 pm Comment from: Jubei

R2 will be pissed because he can't play Pandora while printing.

@question
a lot of has been made of Apple's hobby being a "failure". But by all accounts it has sold some 6M while the Kindle has probably sold around 2M (but Amazon isn't very forthcoming on it).

Yeah, it's no iPod and it's not changing the world's living rooms, yet. But Apple TV isn't a loss leader for selling media titles like other companies' products we could mention; at least Apple TV makes money when it sells. So, really, the critics need to get a little perspective on this.

Harry McCracken?!
Oh... My side...
I can't... stop... laughing...

Feb 02, 10 - 03:50 pm Comment from: Scot Murphy

@Spark

Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while.

Feb 02, 10 - 06:32 pm Comment from: Spark

@Scot Murphy
And a broken clock is correct twice a day.

iThink iPass, no webcam, no buy
iGet $280 netbook

P.S.: audit the (private)Federal Reserve!!

Feb 03, 10 - 02:02 am Comment from: derekcurrie

I hope they sterilized the iPad after FUX touched it.

Haha. Just a little fun poking at the Neo-Con-Jobs.