“Microsoft held back from distributing a free repair for old versions of its software that could have slowed last week’s devastating ransomware attack, instead charging some customers $1,000 a year per device for protection against such threats,” Richard Waters and Hannah Kuchler report for The Financial Times.
“In another controversial pricing move, meanwhile, Microsoft recently began charging customers more for extra security in the top-of-the-line version of Windows 10,” Waters and Kuchler report. “The split pricing marks the first time the company has treated the highest level of security as an add-on feature of its software, drawing criticism that it has left other versions of Windows more open to attack.”
“The company issued a free patch in March that would have protected computers running recent versions of Windows from the malware. But users of older software, such as Windows XP, have to pay hefty fees for so-called ‘custom’ support,” Waters and Kuchler report. “The cost went from $200 per device in 2014, when regular support for XP ended, to $400 the following year. It jumped to $1,000 after that, according to one person who had seen a pricing schedule that Microsoft sent to one customer, with a minimum payment of $750,000 and a ceiling of $25m.”
“The high costs led many — including the UK’s National Health Service — to abandon the special support after one year, leaving them exposed to last week’s attack,” Waters and Kuchler report. “The company also took the rare step of making the expensive patch for old software such as Windows XP free of charge at around midnight local time on Friday, though that was too late to contain the WannaCry outbreak.”
Read more in the full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: Moral of the story (besides that Microsoft has no morals):
You’ll pay one way or another – to the hackers, to Mafiasoft, or in lost data – unless you’re smart enough to use a Mac.
Wasn’t Windows 95/98/Me/2000/XP supposed to be secure? Now, they’re promising Windows Vista will be secure. Yeah, riiight. And, because they’re incapable of making Window secure, they’re going to charge their pigeons $50 per year? For “Microsoft Security,” a misnomer if ever there was one? Why not make Windows itself secure? You know, like Apple’s Mac OS X.
Anyone who buys Windows and then pays Mafiasoft $50 per year in protection money is a damn fool. If you’re that stupid, you deserve to use Windows, and only Windows, for the rest of your life. Wonder what will happen if and when Microsoft’s security subscription earnings dip and need to be, ahem, “reinvigorated?”
Here’s the best personal computer advice you’ll get all year, perhaps ever: If you only use Windows, dump it and get a Mac… You’ll come out so far ahead, you’ll think you’ve jumped forward a decade – which, of course, would be true. — MacDailyNews, February 7, 2006
SEE ALSO:
The Microsoft Tax: How to avoid the WannaCry virus if you’re slumming it with Windows on your Mac – May 17, 2017
Microsoft faulted over massive ransomware cyberattack – May 16, 2017
North Korea thought to be behind worldwide cyber attack on Windows PCs – May 15, 2017
Tim Cook’s refusal to create iPhone backdoor for FBI vindicated by ‘WannaCry’ ransomware attack on Windows PCs – May 15, 2017
The Microsoft Tax: Rapidly replicating Windows PC worm spreads as experts try to limit damage; Macintosh unaffected – May 15, 2017
The Microsoft Tax: Leaked NSA malware hijacks Windows PCs worldwide; Macintosh unaffected – May 13, 2017
USB Kill 2.0 can destroy any Windows PC in seconds, Apple Macintosh unaffected – September 12, 2016
The Microsoft Tax: Malicious worm on Skype lets hackers hold Windows PCs for ransom; Macintosh unaffected – October 10, 2012
The Microsoft Tax: Critical Windows flaw affects millions of high-value PCs with self-replicating attacks – March 13, 2012
The Microsoft Tax: Virus infects Windows PC control systems of US Predator and Reaper drones – October 8, 2011
The Microsoft Tax: ‘Indestructible’ botnet attacks millions of Windows PCs; Macintosh unaffected – July 1, 2011
The Microsoft tax: Stuxnet computer worm infects Microsoft’s porous Windows OS; Mac unaffected – September 27, 2010
The Microsoft Tax: New undetectable Windows trojan empties bank accounts worldwide; Mac unaffected – August 11, 2010
The Microsoft Tax: Windows zero-day flaw exposes users to code execution attack; Mac unaffected – August 09, 2010
The Microsoft Tax: Critical flaw lets hackers take remote control of Windows PCs; Mac unaffected – August 07, 2010
The Microsoft Tax: New attack bypasses every Windows XP security product tested; Mac unaffected – May 11, 2010
The Microsoft Tax: McAfee correctly identifies Windows as malware; Macintosh unaffected – April 21, 2010
The Microsoft Tax: DNS Windows PC Trojan poses as iPhone unlock utility; Mac and iPhone unaffected – April 15, 2010
The Microsoft Tax: 1-in-10 Windows PCs still vulnerable to Conficker worm; Macintosh unaffected – April 08, 2010
The Microsoft Tax: 74,000 Windows PCs in 2,500 companies attacked globally; Mac users unaffected – February 18, 2010
The Microsoft Tax: Widespread attacks exploit Internet Explorer flaw; Macintosh unaffected – January 22, 2010
The Microsoft Tax: Windows 7 zero-day flaw enables attackers to cripple PCs; Macintosh unaffected – November 16, 2009
The Microsoft Tax: Windows 7 flaw allows attackers to remotely crash PCs; Macintosh unaffected – November 12, 2009
The Microsoft Tax: Windows virus delivers child porn to PCs, users go to jail; Mac users unaffected – November 09, 2009
The Microsoft Tax: Worms infest Windows PCs worldwide; Mac users unaffected – November 02, 2009
The Microsoft Tax: Banking Trojan horse steals money from Windows sufferers; Mac users unaffected – September 30, 2009
The Microsoft Tax: Serious Windows security flaw lets hackers to take over PCs; Macintosh unaffected – July 07, 2009
The Microsoft Tax: Windows Conficker worm hits hospital devices; Macintosh unaffected – April 29, 2009
The Microsoft Tax: Conficker virus begins to attack Windows PCs; Macintosh unaffected – April 27, 2009
The Microsoft Tax: Conficker’s estimated economic cost: $9.1 billion – April 24, 2009
Where’s the MS incentive to create a truly secure OS if you can make one not so secure and then charge more to make it “more secure” which you could’ve done in the first place?
…and “upgraded” without your permission.
as bad a fück-up as Pipeline T is, MacOS is ten jillion times more rational than Ballmer T OS.
Microsoft is charging for XP support because it is 13 years old. Upgrade already. It is the people that don’t upgrade that are putting themselves and others at risk. Microsoft don’t want the money for extended support and offer all of it back in consultancy time to corporates who pay for a CSA (custom support agreement), provided the consultancy is spent on upgrading to the latest Windows. Windows 10 was not affected by Wannacry.
You’re half-way there: Upgrade to Mac. Stop playing Russian roulette with buggy, insecure Windows.
But then I’m stuck with a computer I can’t upgrade and expand. I have a Mac Pro (2013) purchased as a replacement for a Mac Mini, just to show expectations.
Check out Ubuntu. Linux is as secure as MacOS and it’s similar behind the scenes, but you can use whatever hardware you want. In fact, check out the laptops at System76.com. My favorite is the Oryx Pro – Quad-Core 2.8-3.8 GHz i7, GTX 1060 (configurable to 1070), 8-64 GB RAM, two M.2 slots, 2 2.5” hard drive bays, and lots of ports. Just be aware that you might not be able to run all of your software on Linux, though there are usually open-source alternatives (i.e. LibreOffice, Calibre, Banshee).
Running Mint on one of my PCs now. Thanks.
Zero incentive. MS is predatory.
I don’t feel “devastated.”
oh yeah, I use a mac.
ooooops……where is Monkey Boy???
MB is loooong gone; of course. Won’t be held liable.
No fan of MS, but at some point as a business, you need to secure your software. And who thinks a 15 year old program is safe or efficient.
If you keep supporting old software, where is the incentive to upgrade?
Even Apple stops support of their older OSes. I think 10.10 is the oldest version that gets updates still. El Capitan came out 2014. For the record Microsoft is supporting older operations systems. Window 7 from 2009, comes to mind here.
Now, it’s a “special” event when Apple has to send out a security patch. For Microsoft it’s nothing special. That is telling.
However I find it more disturbing to learn there is a higher tier security support. This is where you get special treatment for a higher echonomic class. This is not how things should work. If they want to offer free upgrades, fine but if they need money to support that, they have to come up with a different plan, become we all deserve equal treatment.
Agreed. Patching XP would be like Apple patching Leopard. When was the last time Leopard received a patch?
You make an excellent point. Once computer hardware gets to 10 years old, there is no way to justify its use on the internet in any way.
I do have XP machines for checking old files and old apps, but they NEVER go online, ever, ever, ever.
“$200 per device in 2014, when regular support for XP ended, to $400 the following year. It jumped to $1,000 after that”
Wannacry was only $300.
A thrifty XP user can buy a new lower end Win10 laptop for $1000.
We are really talking about people who don’t know, don’t care and are so cheap they don’t value the benefits of their computing hardly at all. Just blind.
$1,000 is nothing to Apple users. Just ask Mac Pro trash can users that got duped into buying THAT.
sure looked cool though…you gotta admit that.
“form follows function.” – Mies Van Der Jobs.
The cylinder Mac Pro worked well for me and other researchers. It was fast; all the reviews were glowing. But after a year or two, it began to fall short of the needs of creatives in certain professions such as video editing; they were hypervocal about the Mac Pro’s non-upgradeable GPUs, its only real Achilles’ Heel. This sticking point ballooned into a blanket condemnation of the entire project, with each and every feature of its design turned into another loathsome defect of Quasimodo. The hysteria went viral, to the point that Apple emerged from their cave with a white flag and a promise to start over.
Apple strives to be a pathfinder, a leader in human technology; but sometimes in their zeal, they strike out in an offbeat direction and get somewhat lost for a time. I’ll allow them the occasional cowpath or dead end, because overall they’ve blazed a broad trail to the future for all of us.
Windows is waiting for you, trondude. Or Linux. Or Unix. Or Chrome. Or…
Trondude… Slimy scum.
Trondude… Slimy scum.
Trondude… Slimy scum.
Trondude… Slimy scum.
Trondude… Slimy scum.
Trondude… Slimy scum.
No need to post it six time, you imbecile
In Essence Windows PC are much more costlier and does not age well.
I can run 25-year old applications on my Windows PC. I have many thousands of dollars worth of apps that are 5-10 years old that won’t run on my Mac.
I’m pretty sure they told people several years ago that Windoze eXtra Pitiful would be EOL.
Apple doesn’t support anything older than 10.10. It would be really nice if they would support 10.6, that was the last release that had proper scroll arrows, and the last release that had Rosetta. It would be even better if they’d support 10.5, with AppleTalk.
Sorry, you can fault M$ for a lot of things, but long term support of OS releases isn’t one of them. eXtra Pitiful is crap, always was crap, and doesn’t deserve the long term support it got.
Jesus, what a bunch of crap. I suppose that Microsoft should still be supporting Windows 3.1?
Yep. MS not at fault. Stupid, moronic idiots still using XP and the scumsucking douchebag that created wannacry.
Users put the “Duh” in Winduhs.