“Consumers have a fixed time budget, a more rigid constraint than their spending budget. Competition for a slice of a consumer’s time budget is far tougher than competition for a slice of a consumer’s wallet,” Dediu writes. “So what’s amazing is that apps have successfully grabbed a share of this time budget. I believe that the reason they succeeded is that they initially fit into niche time slices that were previously unoccupied.”
“Downtime or ‘boredom’ was filled with app interaction. This includes some social media consumption. These are not immersive experiences. They are ‘casual,’ inconsequential and trivial. At first anyway. And that’s the rub,” Dediu writes. “As apps enter a consumer’s world they initially take on non-consumption, which is easy to beat. But as the experiences become increasingly compelling they ‘move upmarket’ and compete more aggressively with existing media consumption patterns. For instance, one might allow casual gaming to take root in non-consuming contexts such as commuting, waiting, and escaping time niches. But if the experience becomes addictive, the gaming takes over time previously spent watching TV or using console games. The same can be observed for app-based experiences of social media, shopping and chatting. This is the insidious march of a disruptor…”
Much more in the full article – highly recommended – here.
[Attribution: Fortune. Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Fred Mertz” for the heads up.]