“The DOJ is arguing for a number of things: Changes in the way that Apple sells content in the App Store, including allowing ebook retailers to sell ebooks directly through their apps without Apple taking a cut; staggered negotiations with book publishers; and the creation of a third party monitor to ensure Apple does not conspire again,” Owen reports. “Not surprisingly, Apple doesn’t want any changes in the way it does business in the App Store, arguing in its brief that the proposal ‘introduces needless regulation and complexity to an evolving marketplace.’”
Read more in the full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: Killing real competition for the appearance of competition is just plain stupid.
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader "Arline M." for the heads up.]
Citing Steve Jobs email, U.S. DOJ claims Apple changed in-app purchase rules to retaliate against Amazon – August 23, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: Apple faces possible May 2014 trial on e-book damages – August 15, 2013
Lawyers have complained for years that Judge Denise Cote pre-judges cases before she enters the courtroom – August 14, 2013
In pretrial view, judge says leaning toward U.S. DOJ over Apple in e-books case – May 24, 2013