Comments on: California court finds for Apple in credit card privacy suit http://macdailynews.com/2013/02/04/california-court-finds-for-apple-in-credit-card-privacy-suit/ Apple and Mac News Fri, 24 May 2013 00:25:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: shiva105 http://macdailynews.com/2013/02/04/california-court-finds-for-apple-in-credit-card-privacy-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-1150478 Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:25:54 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=99104#comment-1150478 One correction- none of the payment processors I’ve looked at require the full address for verification, just the ZIP code. Along with the credit card number, expiration date, and the CCV code from the back of the card. A full address, including street number and name, and city name, are not *required* to process a card.

]]> By: greggthurman http://macdailynews.com/2013/02/04/california-court-finds-for-apple-in-credit-card-privacy-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-1150413 Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:11:39 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=99104#comment-1150413 I hope the Class Action boys lost a ton on this piece of crap suit.

]]> By: golum http://macdailynews.com/2013/02/04/california-court-finds-for-apple-in-credit-card-privacy-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-1150407 Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:03:54 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=99104#comment-1150407 I agree with this ruling.

When you are B&M sales, you see the person in front of you. You can be reasonably assured fraud isn’t taking place. Also you can check ID against the name on the credit card, you just can write it down.

When you are in online sales, the situation changes. You have to be sure that the person is who they say they are, and the shipping address helps with this. Also the CC authorization depends on this.

]]>