“On Monday I published and commented on Samsung’s response to Apple’s recent notice of new facts concerning Samsung’s EU antitrust issues and its unilateral withdrawal of its European standards-based injunction requests,” Florian Mueller reports for FOSS Patents. “Today Apple filed its opposition to Samsung’s motion to strike.”

“On the procedural side Apple argues that its December 21 notice was not too late: ‘Because these are new facts, Apple could not have raised them during the earlier briefing to the Commission.’ and Apple cites ITC precedent allowing such notices,” Mueller reports. “Apple seizes this opportunity to reinforce the points it wants to drive home, which it says are “highly inconvenient facts” to Samsung: the withdrawal of its European SEP-based injunction requests; the fact that Samsung stated publicly that it was “in the interest of protecting consumer choice”; and the fact that the European Commission nevertheless issued a Statement of Objections (SO) and held in its preliminary ruling that Samsung’s pursuit of injunctive relief against Apple, a willing licensee, was anticompetitive.”

Mueller writes, “It would obviously be in Apple’s interest to have Samsung withdraw its ITC complaint (or at least the parts relating to SEPs), but Apple is nevertheless right: it doesn’t make sense to pretend to protect consumer choice in one jurisdiction (Europe) — only because of regulatory pressure — but to continue to push for SEP-based injunctions elsewhere, particularly in the United States. “

Read more in the full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader "Dan K." for the heads up.]

Related articles:
FRAND abuse: Samsung could face $15 billion fine for trying to ban Apple iPhone via standard-essential patents – December 28, 2012
Gotcha! Apple leverages Samsung’s EU antitrust problems, recent statement in U.S. ITC investigation – December 26, 2012
Samsung, Google could be fined billions over abusive efforts to ban Apple sales in Europe – December 26, 2012
The Patent Wars: Crucially, SEPs cannot be used to win injunctions barring products from sale – December 2, 2012
Apple wins strategically important modification of dismissal to keep FRAND defense alive against Google’s Motorola – November 29, 2012
Apple and Google disagree on key parameters of potential FRAND arbitration, including scope – November 16, 2012
Google’s Motorola says it wants binding arbitration to resolve Apple’s FRAND patent claims – November 15, 2012
FTC staff said to formally recommend antitrust lawsuit against Google over FRAND abuse – November 1, 2012
Apple slips bomb into ITC filing: Samsung being probed over SEP abuse by U.S. DOJ – October 24, 2012
Google U.S. antitrust lawsuit said to be urged by FTC investigators over Internet search, FRAND abuse – October 15, 2012
U.S. FTC investigating Google, Motorola Mobility over FRAND abuse – June 30, 2012
EU launches full-blown investigation of Samsung’s suspected abuse of FRAND-pledged patents; Motorola on notice – January 31, 2012
Apple asked standards body to set rules for essential FRAND patents – February 8, 2012