Analyst: ‘Microsoft will ultimately muscle-out Apple as the leader in smartphones and tablets’

“Sizemore Capital’s Charles Sizemore writes in a contribution to NASDAQ that ‘Microsoft will ultimately muscle-out Apple as the leader in smartphones and tablets,'” Zach Epstein reports for BGR. “He says the war will be long and grueling, but Microsoft will ultimately pull ahead because Apple has no ‘durable long-term advantages’ to keep customers loyal.”

MacDailyNews Take: Wait, Zach, you sure this wasn’t Tom Sizemore?

“Where Android is concerned, Sizemore says he doesn’t take Google seriously as a long-term competitor because the company’s solutions are ‘shoddy’ attempts at matching superior offerings from Apple and Microsoft,” Epstein reports. “He continues, ‘Given that Google gives most of its products away for free, you have to question how seriously they take them. And given my experience with Play Music, the answer is ‘not very.””

MacDailyNews Take: Hey, Sizemore, we’ve seen better pumps on a Coney Island hooker!

Epstein report, “The analyst concludes that while he is not forecasting an ‘immediate collapse in Google’s share price,’ he finds no evidence to show that Google’s advertising model is sustainable and therefore will not invest in Google. Sizemore discloses that his firm holds a long position in Microsoft.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Yes, when we entered this one, iCal actually giggled.

Related articles:
Microsoft’s Surface tablet flops, orders reportedly cut in half – November 29, 2012
TechCrunch’s Siegler reviews Microsoft Surface RT: ‘It’s time for a drop test – right into the garbage can’ – November 19, 2012
Slate reviews Microsoft’s Surface tablet: Too slow, mercilessly buggy; why is it so bad? – November 6, 2012
InfoWorld reviews Microsoft Surface RT: A disappointment; you’re better off with Apple’s iPad – October 31, 2012
Gizmodo reviews Microsoft Surface RT: Do not buy; inferior to Apple’s iPad; the worst of both worlds – October 25, 2012
The Verge reviews Microsoft Surface RT tablet: ‘The whole thing is honestly perplexing; who is this for?’ – October 24, 2012

ZDNet’s Kingsley-Hughes: Microsoft’s Windows 8 is an awful, horrible, painful design disaster – June 8, 2012
Analyst meets with big computer maker, finds ‘general lack of enthusiasm’ for Windows 8 – June 8, 2012
Dvorak: Windows 8 an unmitigated disaster; unusable and annoying; it makes your teeth itch – June 3, 2012
The Guardian: Microsoft’s Windows 8 is confusing as hell; an appalling user experience – March 5, 2012
More good news for Apple: Microsoft previews Windows 8 (with video) – June 1, 2011

ITProProtal reviews Apple iPad (4th gen.): ‘The king; the best large tablet you can buy today’ – November 26, 2012
PC Magazine reviews Apple iPad (4th gen.): A very rare 5 star product; a slam dunk Editors’ Choice – November 9, 2012
Review: Apple’s iPad (4th gen.) is faster, stronger, better – November 8, 2012
iPad 4 has processing power to spare; benchmarks show plenty of speed; beats Google Nexus 7, Microsoft Surface – November 6, 2012
Benchmarks: Apple iPad 4′s A6X beats all comers in GPU performance – November 2, 2012
iPad 4 graphics upgrade a serious horsepower increase; Apple’s A6X is one massive processing machine – November 2, 2012

68 Comments

  1. OMG! I am just so amazed. “Apple has no ‘durable long-term advantages’ to keep customers loyal.”

    Wow.. Must be writing from Washington or Colorado, where marijuana is legal now.

    1. It isn’t about Microsoft. It’s all about Sizemore. He’s just trying to get his name out in front of everyone. And look, he succeeded! The same way that Brian White and his $1111 call on Apple got his name out in front of everyone. And look, he succeeded too! Most analysts don’t pull this crap. Despite what some here think, most analysts try to do a legitimate job of analyzing equities. There are exceptions. Sizemore and White are two shining examples. Personally I believe that Sizemore is completely wrong. White may be correct someday but that’s a long way off. Certainly not in the time frame that he suggested. So they’re both knuckleheads. And be careful MDN, you wouldn’t want to cross Tom Sizemore. Trust me, he’s close to what you see on screen.

  2. “….Sizemore Capital’s Charles Sizemore writes in a contribution to NASDAQ that ‘Microsoft will ultimately muscle-out Apple as the leader in smartphones and tablets…”

    Yeah …
    and if pigs had wings …
    they’d be flying out his butt right now, too !

  3. And in other news, it was found that Charles Sizemore’s great grandfather, Samuel Sizemore, who held a long position for the stock of the long ago out of business, Buggy Whips Incorporated, wrote to investors in the early part of the last century that he foresaw horse drawn buggies as resuming a demanding percentage of the overall passenger conveyance market. He said he saw no durable long term advantages to the new fan-dangled thing being termed the automobile.

  4. “Microsoft will ultimately pull ahead because Apple has no ‘durable long-term advantages’ to keep customers loyal…”

    What he really means is that Apple has not devised a lock-in strategy like Microslut has (Office, Exchange, etc.). I think he misses the fact that Microslut’s lock-in strategy is really only successful with corporate IT departments, and as BYOH becomes more popular the strategy will have less sway over the marketplace than it seems to have today. I know some people of whom I otherwise think highly who would only buy hardware that runs Microslut’s software, but not many. When Microslut’s answer to the iPad is the Surface, you really have to wonder how they could ever come back from the deficit in which they find themselves when compared to Apple and sell-through. And what about customer satisfaction? Does it count for nothing? This guy is clearly attempting to bring some kind of luster back to the stock by sheer bluster.

    1. Even from that perspective his comments are wrong though. What of the App Store? Purchasing a ton of apps that you use daily is a pretty good lock-in. (and what of customer satisfaction – that is a pretty good lock-in)

  5. There is definitely something wrong with our financial “system” when an idiot like this can have more influence on Apple’s share price than the company’s actual performance.

    1. Interestingly enough, I found this comment using the keywords…

      Idiot analyst Sizemore

      What the actual fuck is Sizemore’s problem? Just because you don’t understand something, don’t disparage and if you REALLY don’t get it, like he doesn’t get it… STFU.

  6. “Microsoft will ultimately pull ahead because Apple has no ”durable long-term advantages” to keep customers loyal.”

    Apple has four:
    1) The iPad 1 that I have had for 2 1/2 years is by far the best piece of consumer electronics that I have ever owned. It is the computer I’ve always wanted, going back to a PDP-11. (for you young ones: I had my hands on a PDP-11 in 1975: 37 years ago. )

    2) Apple’s and AT&T’s customer service for my iPhone 3G and now 4s is by far the best I’ve had for ANY product I have ever owned.

    3) As far as Apple controlling the “user experience”: I WANT a 100 billion dollar company between me and someone who could try to due something malicious to my cell phone. Since I frequently work in remote areas alone, my life could literally depend on this. I’m not going to risk it to a company that is famous for the “blue screen of death”.

    4) Now that I’ve been “schooled by apple” in what is possible, I ain’t going back.

    To me, Apple’s strategy is just fine. Thank you very much.

    One last thing: In more than 20 years of using windows, I never said “Wow look what it can do!”. It has always been 3rd party software: Microstation, Photoshop, Illustrator, or a piece of software that corrects something Microsoft does wrong the has amazed me. Contrast that with the iPad or iPhone, even after 3 years, they amaze me almost on a daily basis.

    Yeah, Apple’s strategy is just fine.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.