<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citigroup initiates AAPL coverage with &#8216;Buy&#8217; rating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/11/26/citigroup-initiates-aapl-coverage-with-buy-rating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/11/26/citigroup-initiates-aapl-coverage-with-buy-rating/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:24:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Peabody</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/11/26/citigroup-initiates-aapl-coverage-with-buy-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-1112745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Peabody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=94832#comment-1112745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#039;re operating in a solid, predictable and fiscally conservative fashion as they always did under the watchful eye of SJ. There is no good reason why the experts can&#039;t find more optimism in aapl. No logical one anyway.

In the middle 90s I remember watching the most stupid documentary I&#039;ve ever seen in my life, based in the premise that, building a better product does not always mean you&#039;ll win or sell more product. Guess who the examples were in that doc.? Yup, MS was the example of a winner, and Apple was the example of the better product [i.e. the loser].

The feeling I&#039;m getting lately is that, after all the market experts (who, in the previous decade, could never ever find even one good thing to say about Apple) watch and profit, through no wisdom of their own, as aapl shoots for the moon, they now want to return to business as usual and prove that a well run, financially solid [way more solid than most banks by now], acutely profitable and product/profit oriented, can&#039;t win by any standard definition of an above average, well run corporation.

A completely different way of saying the same things might be: Apple doesn&#039;t take stupid risks, either as a manufacturer or as corporation, and I think that chaps Wall Street&#039;s ass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re operating in a solid, predictable and fiscally conservative fashion as they always did under the watchful eye of SJ. There is no good reason why the experts can&#8217;t find more optimism in aapl. No logical one anyway.</p>
<p>In the middle 90s I remember watching the most stupid documentary I&#8217;ve ever seen in my life, based in the premise that, building a better product does not always mean you&#8217;ll win or sell more product. Guess who the examples were in that doc.? Yup, MS was the example of a winner, and Apple was the example of the better product [i.e. the loser].</p>
<p>The feeling I&#8217;m getting lately is that, after all the market experts (who, in the previous decade, could never ever find even one good thing to say about Apple) watch and profit, through no wisdom of their own, as aapl shoots for the moon, they now want to return to business as usual and prove that a well run, financially solid [way more solid than most banks by now], acutely profitable and product/profit oriented, can&#8217;t win by any standard definition of an above average, well run corporation.</p>
<p>A completely different way of saying the same things might be: Apple doesn&#8217;t take stupid risks, either as a manufacturer or as corporation, and I think that chaps Wall Street&#8217;s ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMWTwisty</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/11/26/citigroup-initiates-aapl-coverage-with-buy-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-1112498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BMWTwisty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=94832#comment-1112498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citigroup&#039;s Richard Gardner as of April 25  had a Buy rating and a $720 target]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citigroup&#8217;s Richard Gardner as of April 25  had a Buy rating and a $720 target</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laughing_Boy48</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/11/26/citigroup-initiates-aapl-coverage-with-buy-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-1112472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laughing_Boy48]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=94832#comment-1112472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really can&#039;t take it.  They&#039;re calling for Apple&#039;s share price to be where it was in April of this year despite Apple earning more money which means that Apple&#039;s P/E will be squeezed even more than it was.  Meanwhile Amazon is losing money and the current share price is well above its April share price and the P/E has simply exploded.  I&#039;m not exactly sure what Apple is doing wrong but whatever it is, they surely need to do something about it.  Obviously, Apple merely earning more money doesn&#039;t seem to be a clear-cut solution for Apple shareholders.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really can&#8217;t take it.  They&#8217;re calling for Apple&#8217;s share price to be where it was in April of this year despite Apple earning more money which means that Apple&#8217;s P/E will be squeezed even more than it was.  Meanwhile Amazon is losing money and the current share price is well above its April share price and the P/E has simply exploded.  I&#8217;m not exactly sure what Apple is doing wrong but whatever it is, they surely need to do something about it.  Obviously, Apple merely earning more money doesn&#8217;t seem to be a clear-cut solution for Apple shareholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qka</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/11/26/citigroup-initiates-aapl-coverage-with-buy-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-1112462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[qka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=94832#comment-1112462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Citigroup wasn&#039;t already tracking AAPL, only the largest public company on the planet?

Tell me you&#039;re kidding, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Citigroup wasn&#8217;t already tracking AAPL, only the largest public company on the planet?</p>
<p>Tell me you&#8217;re kidding, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
