<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple breaks new ground with iPhone 5’s in-cell touch and iPad mini’s DITO film structure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/11/26/apple-breaks-new-ground-with-iphone-5s-in-cell-touch-and-ipad-minis-dito-film-structure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/11/26/apple-breaks-new-ground-with-iphone-5s-in-cell-touch-and-ipad-minis-dito-film-structure/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:41:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanaudio</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/11/26/apple-breaks-new-ground-with-iphone-5s-in-cell-touch-and-ipad-minis-dito-film-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-1112970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanaudio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=94907#comment-1112970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;With the advent of new touch sensor structures driven by consumer demand for lighter and thinner devices&quot;

I&#039;m not so sure that consumers are really demanding lighter and thinner devices. I think that other aspects are drastically more important.

Obviously lighter and thinner is usually an advantage, while thicker and heavy is a disadvantage, but when it comes to choosing one device over another, a thickness reduction of 0.35 mm as mentioned here is simply not going to be noticed unless you measure it with precision instruments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With the advent of new touch sensor structures driven by consumer demand for lighter and thinner devices&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure that consumers are really demanding lighter and thinner devices. I think that other aspects are drastically more important.</p>
<p>Obviously lighter and thinner is usually an advantage, while thicker and heavy is a disadvantage, but when it comes to choosing one device over another, a thickness reduction of 0.35 mm as mentioned here is simply not going to be noticed unless you measure it with precision instruments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirROM</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/11/26/apple-breaks-new-ground-with-iphone-5s-in-cell-touch-and-ipad-minis-dito-film-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-1112770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SirROM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=94907#comment-1112770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee, I guess Apple really doesn&#039;t do anything except copy others like Shamesong. When will they ever quit suing and get back to innovating their products so they will be cutting edge and top-of-the-line?

Oh wait....

Cue the Androholes that have to defend inferior products any way they can]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I guess Apple really doesn&#8217;t do anything except copy others like Shamesong. When will they ever quit suing and get back to innovating their products so they will be cutting edge and top-of-the-line?</p>
<p>Oh wait&#8230;.</p>
<p>Cue the Androholes that have to defend inferior products any way they can</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
