<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China Telecom, Unicom set to narrow 3G gap with iPhone 5; China Mobile loses out without iPhone contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/29/china-telecom-unicom-set-to-narrow-3g-gap-with-iphone-5-china-mobile-loses-out-without-iphone-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/29/china-telecom-unicom-set-to-narrow-3g-gap-with-iphone-5-china-mobile-loses-out-without-iphone-contract/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:49:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: panicko lawrence</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/29/china-telecom-unicom-set-to-narrow-3g-gap-with-iphone-5-china-mobile-loses-out-without-iphone-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-1161908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[panicko lawrence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 10:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=93039#comment-1161908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[only had bad experiences with china unicom, not sure how quickly china unicom can grow unless the fix alot of issues...

~panicko lawrence]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only had bad experiences with china unicom, not sure how quickly china unicom can grow unless the fix alot of issues&#8230;</p>
<p>~panicko lawrence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the joker</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/29/china-telecom-unicom-set-to-narrow-3g-gap-with-iphone-5-china-mobile-loses-out-without-iphone-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-1094940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the joker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=93039#comment-1094940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;As of January 2012, China Mobile is the world&#039;s largest mobile phone operator with about 655 million subscribers.[8&quot;

China Unicom isnt even slightly close to China Mobile.  All the providers put together arent even close to China Mobile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As of January 2012, China Mobile is the world&#8217;s largest mobile phone operator with about 655 million subscribers.[8&#8243;</p>
<p>China Unicom isnt even slightly close to China Mobile.  All the providers put together arent even close to China Mobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KenC</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/29/china-telecom-unicom-set-to-narrow-3g-gap-with-iphone-5-china-mobile-loses-out-without-iphone-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-1094718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KenC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=93039#comment-1094718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it&#039;s true that CM has a ton more users than CU, almost all of those are pre-paid. The post-paid numbers are just a fraction of the total, and both CU and China Telecom, CT are very close to CM&#039;s numbers.

If you read the article, towards the bottom they give the latest actual 3G post-paid subscriber numbers:

&quot;China Telecom increased its 3G subscriber base by 5.8 percent in September to 59.7 million, while China Unicom expanded by 5.0 percent to 66.9 million and China Mobile by 4.8 percent to 75.6 million, company data showed.&quot;

I&#039;d say 60M to 67M to 76M is very close.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s true that CM has a ton more users than CU, almost all of those are pre-paid. The post-paid numbers are just a fraction of the total, and both CU and China Telecom, CT are very close to CM&#8217;s numbers.</p>
<p>If you read the article, towards the bottom they give the latest actual 3G post-paid subscriber numbers:</p>
<p>&#8220;China Telecom increased its 3G subscriber base by 5.8 percent in September to 59.7 million, while China Unicom expanded by 5.0 percent to 66.9 million and China Mobile by 4.8 percent to 75.6 million, company data showed.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say 60M to 67M to 76M is very close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the joker</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/29/china-telecom-unicom-set-to-narrow-3g-gap-with-iphone-5-china-mobile-loses-out-without-iphone-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-1094596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the joker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=93039#comment-1094596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China Mobile only has about 500 million more subscribers than China Unicom.  I am sure that they are real worried.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China Mobile only has about 500 million more subscribers than China Unicom.  I am sure that they are real worried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyintheskyuk</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/29/china-telecom-unicom-set-to-narrow-3g-gap-with-iphone-5-china-mobile-loses-out-without-iphone-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-1094593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spyintheskyuk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=93039#comment-1094593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well that&#039;s a clear as mud]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s a clear as mud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
