<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Patent office tentatively invalidates Apple&#8217;s rubber-banding patent used in Samsung trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buster</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1091435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1091435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Apple,
The solution is...Move to Canada. We will protect you and hey, you are close enough to the US so you won&#039;t get homesick although I am pretty sure you are getting pissed at your Motherland for selling you out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Apple,<br />
The solution is&#8230;Move to Canada. We will protect you and hey, you are close enough to the US so you won&#8217;t get homesick although I am pretty sure you are getting pissed at your Motherland for selling you out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leodavinci1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1091209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leodavinci1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1091209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny you should mention the Mouse. 

With the influence that Disney has on Congress to keep fudging with copyright laws, it wouldn&#039;t be surprised to find out they have their fingers in the patent system as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you should mention the Mouse. </p>
<p>With the influence that Disney has on Congress to keep fudging with copyright laws, it wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to find out they have their fingers in the patent system as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: payshunz</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1091197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[payshunz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1091197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You do realize Samsung is a South Korean company, and that many Apple products are manufactured in China rather than Japan, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do realize Samsung is a South Korean company, and that many Apple products are manufactured in China rather than Japan, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoop Dogg</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1091115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snoop Dogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1091115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What the fuck is wrong with the us patent office :(:( :mad:]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the fuck is wrong with the us patent office <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> :( <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mad.gif' alt=':mad:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff II</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1091059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff II]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1091059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good one, my friend.  I was thinking that &quot;Rubber Banding snappeth away&quot; but you got here first!  :-) 🔥]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one, my friend.  I was thinking that &#8220;Rubber Banding snappeth away&#8221; but you got here first!  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  🔥</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wp8!</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1091001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wp8!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1091001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s apples fault, they moved jobs to china or Japan and gave them trade secrets.. Samsung wouldn&#039;t have the slightes clue on how to do what they did if they didn&#039;t already have apples he prints... Bring the jobs back home apple!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s apples fault, they moved jobs to china or Japan and gave them trade secrets.. Samsung wouldn&#8217;t have the slightes clue on how to do what they did if they didn&#8217;t already have apples he prints&#8230; Bring the jobs back home apple!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 62sparkplug</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[62sparkplug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If somebody has some good insight into this, I would like to hear it.  Let me get this straight, somebody or entity files an application for a patent with the Patent Office which can take months if not years before one is finally granted. Then if there&#039;s a request for a review, the same Patent Office can turn around and essentially say sorry, remember that patent we awarded you, April Fools, we were just kidding, it&#039;s invalid.   ?????  

Who does the initial evaluation and granting of the patent in the first place, Mickey Mouse?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If somebody has some good insight into this, I would like to hear it.  Let me get this straight, somebody or entity files an application for a patent with the Patent Office which can take months if not years before one is finally granted. Then if there&#8217;s a request for a review, the same Patent Office can turn around and essentially say sorry, remember that patent we awarded you, April Fools, we were just kidding, it&#8217;s invalid.   ?????  </p>
<p>Who does the initial evaluation and granting of the patent in the first place, Mickey Mouse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DogGonetoo</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DogGonetoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only way to stay ahead is to continue innovating.  Don&#039;t forget this succeeded with the iPod. Only problem is that the mobile market is huge and encourages companies to copy since they can make so much money. 
Apple is doing the right thing by cutting Samsung and google off. It&#039;s a shame the legal route has not worked. Maybe better to cut their losses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way to stay ahead is to continue innovating.  Don&#8217;t forget this succeeded with the iPod. Only problem is that the mobile market is huge and encourages companies to copy since they can make so much money.<br />
Apple is doing the right thing by cutting Samsung and google off. It&#8217;s a shame the legal route has not worked. Maybe better to cut their losses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mossman</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mossman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, as well as whichever legislation or ruling that allowed software patents in the first place.

In case no one&#039;s noticed, they aren&#039;t benefiting Apple, they&#039;re not benefiting Samsung or Google, they&#039;re only benefiting the goddamn intellectual property lawyers and patent trolls!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as well as whichever legislation or ruling that allowed software patents in the first place.</p>
<p>In case no one&#8217;s noticed, they aren&#8217;t benefiting Apple, they&#8217;re not benefiting Samsung or Google, they&#8217;re only benefiting the goddamn intellectual property lawyers and patent trolls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Road Warrior</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Road Warrior]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I certainly agree with you there, something smells fishy and corrupt. Perhaps there should be a court case against the patent office. That would be some trial, all those lawyers would be drooling over it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree with you there, something smells fishy and corrupt. Perhaps there should be a court case against the patent office. That would be some trial, all those lawyers would be drooling over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Troy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally agree, came on US government, you already let thousand of work opportunities to go and now you are going to get rid of the US people&#039;s creativity go too?
How else is the government traying to screw this country?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree, came on US government, you already let thousand of work opportunities to go and now you are going to get rid of the US people&#8217;s creativity go too?<br />
How else is the government traying to screw this country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[APPLE should start hiring crooked lawyers, smart decent intelligent lawyers don&#039;t cut it with these lawsuits against thieves. Mr. Tim Cook
please reasses your legal dept., seems so...........................]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APPLE should start hiring crooked lawyers, smart decent intelligent lawyers don&#8217;t cut it with these lawsuits against thieves. Mr. Tim Cook<br />
please reasses your legal dept., seems so&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armando</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armando]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patent office should reimburse Apple for all legal expenses. An investigation of the patent office is warranted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patent office should reimburse Apple for all legal expenses. An investigation of the patent office is warranted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacRaven</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacRaven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why bother to patent anything if it can be invalidated later? American companies innovate only to let our great (sarcasm) legal system give it away for free to foreign thieves. This country is getting so illogical it defies any normal logical thought process to wonder how this shit happens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bother to patent anything if it can be invalidated later? American companies innovate only to let our great (sarcasm) legal system give it away for free to foreign thieves. This country is getting so illogical it defies any normal logical thought process to wonder how this shit happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bongo</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bongo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is devastating news. How the **** can this happen? Grant patents and take them away on a whim, with a billion dollar lawsuit hanging in the balance. I&#039;m disgusted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is devastating news. How the **** can this happen? Grant patents and take them away on a whim, with a billion dollar lawsuit hanging in the balance. I&#8217;m disgusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnold Ziffel</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arnold Ziffel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Googhoul&#039;s lobbying $ at work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googhoul&#8217;s lobbying $ at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeke</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why spend time and money to invent anything when our patent and courts systems will allow the competition to simply rip us off?  Welcome back to the world of the beige box and &quot;good enough&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why spend time and money to invent anything when our patent and courts systems will allow the competition to simply rip us off?  Welcome back to the world of the beige box and &#8220;good enough&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now, Now...</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Now, Now...]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#039;Rubber Banding&#039; giveth and the &#039;Rubber Banding&#039; taketh away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;Rubber Banding&#8217; giveth and the &#8216;Rubber Banding&#8217; taketh away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iJah420</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iJah420]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corrupt as corrupt can be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrupt as corrupt can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan0</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/23/u-s-patent-office-tentatively-invalidates-apples-rubber-banding-patent-used-in-samsung-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-1090932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92574#comment-1090932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, a apple patent is invalidated by a apple patent yes this signals doom it&#039;s open season on IOS might as well open source it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, a apple patent is invalidated by a apple patent yes this signals doom it&#8217;s open season on IOS might as well open source it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
