<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s &#8216;iPad mini&#8217; display may have same 4:3 aspect ratio as full-size iPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:38:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppleVideoReviews.com</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1087530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppleVideoReviews.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92201#comment-1087530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://applevideoreviews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apple Video Reviews - The Apple Product Review Directory&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://applevideoreviews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/" rel="nofollow">Apple Video Reviews &#8211; The Apple Product Review Directory</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bongo</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1087328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bongo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92201#comment-1087328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s actually good to see all these different rumors so close to release. It means Apple still has the ability to keep things secret, unlike the iPhone 5.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually good to see all these different rumors so close to release. It means Apple still has the ability to keep things secret, unlike the iPhone 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1087318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92201#comment-1087318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope this story is correct. A 7.85&quot; screen at a 4:3 aspect ratio would provide the new iPad with 40% more screen area than its rivals with ostensibly similar screen sizes, i.e. 7&quot; at 16:9 aspect ratio.  The difference in screen area will be obvious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this story is correct. A 7.85&#8243; screen at a 4:3 aspect ratio would provide the new iPad with 40% more screen area than its rivals with ostensibly similar screen sizes, i.e. 7&#8243; at 16:9 aspect ratio.  The difference in screen area will be obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ballmer's left nut</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1087293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ballmer's left nut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92201#comment-1087293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many failed 16:9 Android tablets out there must litter the landfills of the world before 4:3 is accepted as the golden ratio.

The UI elements for the iPad differ significantly from the iPhone for some apps. Take mail and calendar for example as two instances. Due to the larger iPad screen, the apps spread themselves out in landscape mode. You want to maintain the same UI elements scaled down for the iPad mini, not adopt the iPhone UI elements.

Therefore maintaining a 4:3 aspect ratio would allow developers to adjust their apps to iPad 2 resolution which still looks pretty good in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many failed 16:9 Android tablets out there must litter the landfills of the world before 4:3 is accepted as the golden ratio.</p>
<p>The UI elements for the iPad differ significantly from the iPhone for some apps. Take mail and calendar for example as two instances. Due to the larger iPad screen, the apps spread themselves out in landscape mode. You want to maintain the same UI elements scaled down for the iPad mini, not adopt the iPhone UI elements.</p>
<p>Therefore maintaining a 4:3 aspect ratio would allow developers to adjust their apps to iPad 2 resolution which still looks pretty good in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R2</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1087283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92201#comment-1087283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome.  16:9 sucks on tablets.  I don&#039;t even like it on phones; Apple should&#039;ve made the iPhone both longer and wider to maintain its original 3:2 ratio.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome.  16:9 sucks on tablets.  I don&#8217;t even like it on phones; Apple should&#8217;ve made the iPhone both longer and wider to maintain its original 3:2 ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterblood71</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1087279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peterblood71]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92201#comment-1087279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEE no iPad Mini, SPEAK no iPad Mini, HEAR no iPad Mini, until October 23rd!  Hot damn, Christmas comes early again!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEE no iPad Mini, SPEAK no iPad Mini, HEAR no iPad Mini, until October 23rd!  Hot damn, Christmas comes early again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecrabb</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1087267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ecrabb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92201#comment-1087267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess this would make sense and completely avoid any further fragmentation resulting from additional unique display resolutions.

The original iPad&#039;s pixel density is 132ppi, while the non-retina iPhone&#039;s is 163ppi. If you take the iPad&#039;s 1024x768 screen and scale it down from 9.7 to 7.86 diagonal, you get 163 pip - same as original iPhone.

This seems the most plausible of anything I&#039;ve seen so far. If you don&#039;t have to file your fingertips to use the iPhone, neither will have to file your fingertips to use supposed iPad mini.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess this would make sense and completely avoid any further fragmentation resulting from additional unique display resolutions.</p>
<p>The original iPad&#8217;s pixel density is 132ppi, while the non-retina iPhone&#8217;s is 163ppi. If you take the iPad&#8217;s 1024&#215;768 screen and scale it down from 9.7 to 7.86 diagonal, you get 163 pip &#8211; same as original iPhone.</p>
<p>This seems the most plausible of anything I&#8217;ve seen so far. If you don&#8217;t have to file your fingertips to use the iPhone, neither will have to file your fingertips to use supposed iPad mini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: althegeo</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1087261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[althegeo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92201#comment-1087261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duhh!

We&#039;ve known that for months, even though the iPad mini may not exist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duhh!</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve known that for months, even though the iPad mini may not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tflint</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1087260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tflint]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92201#comment-1087260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop writing bullshit and wait for the facts]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop writing bullshit and wait for the facts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I love Apple</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/10/17/apples-ipad-mini-display-may-have-same-43-aspect-ratio-as-full-size-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-1087257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I love Apple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=92201#comment-1087257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the right ratio.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the right ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
