<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung continues to challenge &#8216;Made for iPhone&#8217; trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunbeamrapier</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunbeamrapier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 09:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am waiting for Apple to remove all is business ftom Samsung.  We all know they will.  I would not be surprised if Apple opened a processor fab plant in the US to make its own processors: easier to keep your IP out of the hands of Asian copiers...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am waiting for Apple to remove all is business ftom Samsung.  We all know they will.  I would not be surprised if Apple opened a processor fab plant in the US to make its own processors: easier to keep your IP out of the hands of Asian copiers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twimoon1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[twimoon1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got this trademark from out of town, and boy are my photocopiers tired.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got this trademark from out of town, and boy are my photocopiers tired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordthree</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lordthree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where&#039;s pat?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s pat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eldernorm</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eldernorm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 15:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you forgot:  Bada Boom!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you forgot:  Bada Boom!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The complaint hasn&#039;t formally been made yet. The deadline, supposedly the last one, is sometime this fall says the report. Now that Apple won their desiign win against Samsung, they really don&#039;t have a case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The complaint hasn&#8217;t formally been made yet. The deadline, supposedly the last one, is sometime this fall says the report. Now that Apple won their desiign win against Samsung, they really don&#8217;t have a case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheConfuzed1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheConfuzed1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is beyond ridiculous!

On what grounds are they basing their complaint?!?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is beyond ridiculous!</p>
<p>On what grounds are they basing their complaint?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Currie</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Currie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 05:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does an objection like this from ShameDong and DebAcer not get &lt;b&gt;thrown out of court?&lt;/b&gt; This sounds like Canadian legal buffoonery.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does an objection like this from ShameDong and DebAcer not get <b>thrown out of court?</b> This sounds like Canadian legal buffoonery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qka</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[qka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 03:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+∞!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+∞!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 02:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An outline of the iPhone, with the words &quot;Made for iPhone&quot; next to it. Of course Samsung would be upset. They wanted to use the same drawing with &quot;Made for Android iPhones&quot;. 
I can see why they are upset. Beat at their own game I tell ya. Beat at their own game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An outline of the iPhone, with the words &#8220;Made for iPhone&#8221; next to it. Of course Samsung would be upset. They wanted to use the same drawing with &#8220;Made for Android iPhones&#8221;.<br />
I can see why they are upset. Beat at their own game I tell ya. Beat at their own game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterblood71</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peterblood71]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 01:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually &quot;parasite who exclusively lives off its own excrement.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually &#8220;parasite who exclusively lives off its own excrement.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoC</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BoC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 01:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Samsung spent as much time and energy on innovating...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Samsung spent as much time and energy on innovating&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jax44</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jax44]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; Take my trademark, please&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Take my trademark, please&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, this is definitely the MDN comedy club. Where did you get this guys? I&#039;m busting my gut laughing. I want more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, this is definitely the MDN comedy club. Where did you get this guys? I&#8217;m busting my gut laughing. I want more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha ha ha ha!!! &quot;looks like Samsung&#039;s stolen iPhone ripoff.&quot; It&#039;s a comedy club here tonight. Good one Tim! I was thinking the same damn thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha ha!!! &#8220;looks like Samsung&#8217;s stolen iPhone ripoff.&#8221; It&#8217;s a comedy club here tonight. Good one Tim! I was thinking the same damn thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingmel</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kingmel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because the device outline clearly resembles various Samsung phones ;)  It would be confusing to Android users who couldn&#039;t fit the accessories on their Galaxy devices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the device outline clearly resembles various Samsung phones <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   It would be confusing to Android users who couldn&#8217;t fit the accessories on their Galaxy devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just a guess</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[just a guess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think they&#039;re suing because they think it&#039;s too similar to their trademark, &quot;Made Like iPhone&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re suing because they think it&#8217;s too similar to their trademark, &#8220;Made Like iPhone&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My guess is because the trademark looks like Samsung&#039;s stolen iPhone ripoff.  As the wheels of legal systems turn at a snail&#039;s pace, Samsung is probably complaining it looks like their ripoff.  The irony, huh?

Fuck Samsung.  No, not &quot;FSCK Samsung&quot;.  Fuck Samsung.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is because the trademark looks like Samsung&#8217;s stolen iPhone ripoff.  As the wheels of legal systems turn at a snail&#8217;s pace, Samsung is probably complaining it looks like their ripoff.  The irony, huh?</p>
<p>Fuck Samsung.  No, not &#8220;FSCK Samsung&#8221;.  Fuck Samsung.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Setting aside *why* would do this (because I&#039;m befuddled): I don&#039;t understand the grounds on which they are complaining. Or put another way, what official reason could they possibly give for objecting to the trademark?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting aside *why* would do this (because I&#8217;m befuddled): I don&#8217;t understand the grounds on which they are complaining. Or put another way, what official reason could they possibly give for objecting to the trademark?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that&#039;s fkg funny!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s fkg funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sucker</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sucker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because they&#039;ll now fight Apple over everything. I guess they don&#039;t appreciate the business Apple gave them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they&#8217;ll now fight Apple over everything. I guess they don&#8217;t appreciate the business Apple gave them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamLowry</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SamLowry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in Korean, Samsung means &quot;parasite&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in Korean, Samsung means &#8220;parasite&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarlV</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KarlV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Samsung ban stands firm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Samsung ban stands firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordthree</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lordthree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why on earth would they pick THIS to battle Apple over?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on earth would they pick THIS to battle Apple over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Pondo</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/31/samsung-continues-to-challenge-made-for-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-1030384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Pondo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=89025#comment-1030384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They really are the shit of the earth.

I worked in a marketing agency called Digitas for 2 years on this account and they never had a clue. Seriously, one of the worst, most clueless clients in the world and their AoR (agency of record) for print and TV was a shithouse that gave them garbage advertising with no ideas. &quot;show sexy 20-somethings...&quot; Done!

The company is run by engineers that do not think for themselves, which is funny, because all these shit-headed 20-somethings think that Samsung is just a cool company being repressed by Apple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They really are the shit of the earth.</p>
<p>I worked in a marketing agency called Digitas for 2 years on this account and they never had a clue. Seriously, one of the worst, most clueless clients in the world and their AoR (agency of record) for print and TV was a shithouse that gave them garbage advertising with no ideas. &#8220;show sexy 20-somethings&#8230;&#8221; Done!</p>
<p>The company is run by engineers that do not think for themselves, which is funny, because all these shit-headed 20-somethings think that Samsung is just a cool company being repressed by Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
