<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Apple vs Samsung verdict is a big mistake or something</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh boy</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1028625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oh boy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His humor disapated with his last brain cell during the pervious evacuation that he&#039;ll blamed on the family dog.

Passing by has just lost out by Passing Gas.. To late!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His humor disapated with his last brain cell during the pervious evacuation that he&#8217;ll blamed on the family dog.</p>
<p>Passing by has just lost out by Passing Gas.. To late!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenrm</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1028620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kenrm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I also salute you in your articulate way of showing where the Bear Shits in the Woods.

Yes it was the best read of the day and more importantly &quot;it brought a tear to me eye&quot; also ! 

Thanks NHL,  Beating around the bush has never been my forte either.  :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I also salute you in your articulate way of showing where the Bear Shits in the Woods.</p>
<p>Yes it was the best read of the day and more importantly &#8220;it brought a tear to me eye&#8221; also ! </p>
<p>Thanks NHL,  Beating around the bush has never been my forte either.  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff II</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1028586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff II]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What looks like kidneys to you resemble buck teeth to me.  We&#039;re splitting hairs.

BTW, the word is &quot;grille&quot; not &quot;grill.

In re the Ford, Chevrolet, and Dodge grilles, what I tried to say was that they have no real ongoing and easily recognizable design.  Detroit changes grille design rather often but the basic grille designs of European marques from the 50s are recognizable 60 years hence.

Rolls and Lincoln?  You may be right - I didn&#039;t realize that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What looks like kidneys to you resemble buck teeth to me.  We&#8217;re splitting hairs.</p>
<p>BTW, the word is &#8220;grille&#8221; not &#8220;grill.</p>
<p>In re the Ford, Chevrolet, and Dodge grilles, what I tried to say was that they have no real ongoing and easily recognizable design.  Detroit changes grille design rather often but the basic grille designs of European marques from the 50s are recognizable 60 years hence.</p>
<p>Rolls and Lincoln?  You may be right &#8211; I didn&#8217;t realize that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannahjs</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1028562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hannahjs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why so polite and reserved today, Derek? ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why so polite and reserved today, Derek? <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buster</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1028285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Passing Gas, Rick is an idiot who thinks stealing is ok. NHL is merely pointing this out in a humourous way (which I found hilarious).

You really ought to find out where along the way you lost your stench of humour.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Passing Gas, Rick is an idiot who thinks stealing is ok. NHL is merely pointing this out in a humourous way (which I found hilarious).</p>
<p>You really ought to find out where along the way you lost your stench of humour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizlaw</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bizlaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following a design trend and blatant copying are two entirely different things. Samsung blatantly copied Apple&#039;s designs, and even Google saw what was happening and told Samsung to stop.

Plus, it wasn&#039;t just hardware designs. Samsung was found to have WILLINGLY copied aspects of iOS that Apple had received patents for. 

This guy&#039;s a moron. Yes, Apple ushered in the era of large screened touch-operated mobile phone/computers. So everyone started using a 3.5&quot; screen (or larger) for their phone with touch input. Nothing wrong with that, except for when they had to copy Apple&#039;s technology to make it happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following a design trend and blatant copying are two entirely different things. Samsung blatantly copied Apple&#8217;s designs, and even Google saw what was happening and told Samsung to stop.</p>
<p>Plus, it wasn&#8217;t just hardware designs. Samsung was found to have WILLINGLY copied aspects of iOS that Apple had received patents for. </p>
<p>This guy&#8217;s a moron. Yes, Apple ushered in the era of large screened touch-operated mobile phone/computers. So everyone started using a 3.5&#8243; screen (or larger) for their phone with touch input. Nothing wrong with that, except for when they had to copy Apple&#8217;s technology to make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'Segun</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA['Segun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree. Apple&#039;s victory is is a judgement against laziness. Don&#039;t just sit there and let Apple do all the chasing and killing, then waltz in for dinner. 

Seriously, have you driven a car with a built-in GPS lately? The function and interface would make a grown man cry. We had to depend on our IPhones instead and I can&#039;t wait to see what Apple will do with the new Maps app coming soon.

Think big picture and you will see why it is good for Apple to win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. Apple&#8217;s victory is is a judgement against laziness. Don&#8217;t just sit there and let Apple do all the chasing and killing, then waltz in for dinner. </p>
<p>Seriously, have you driven a car with a built-in GPS lately? The function and interface would make a grown man cry. We had to depend on our IPhones instead and I can&#8217;t wait to see what Apple will do with the new Maps app coming soon.</p>
<p>Think big picture and you will see why it is good for Apple to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: althegeo</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[althegeo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft copied another company to get Excel. Excel was made for the first Mac.

Every laptop for sale today is a copy of an Apple Laptop design.

Apple has iPhone designs, working models and patents that all predate the LG Prada.

There were App stores in every computer shop on the planet before 2005.

Apple, with Kodak, invented digital photography and the digital camera.

Photos, with a text message, have been sent since shortly after Al Gore invented the internet.

iPhones have external antennas.

Actually, the GUI and the mouse were invented about 10 years before Xerox started working on it.

You lose Troll.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft copied another company to get Excel. Excel was made for the first Mac.</p>
<p>Every laptop for sale today is a copy of an Apple Laptop design.</p>
<p>Apple has iPhone designs, working models and patents that all predate the LG Prada.</p>
<p>There were App stores in every computer shop on the planet before 2005.</p>
<p>Apple, with Kodak, invented digital photography and the digital camera.</p>
<p>Photos, with a text message, have been sent since shortly after Al Gore invented the internet.</p>
<p>iPhones have external antennas.</p>
<p>Actually, the GUI and the mouse were invented about 10 years before Xerox started working on it.</p>
<p>You lose Troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: althegeo</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[althegeo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rope lights have been around, in one form or another, for decades. You mean LED lights.

LED lights have been around since portable, hand held radios.

Putting them on cars and trucks on the dashboard happened a couple decades ago.

Putting them externally on vehicles happened before Audi&#039;s sexy frontal placement.

As for trade dress, no car company copied Audi&#039;s LED light designs.

You lose troll.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rope lights have been around, in one form or another, for decades. You mean LED lights.</p>
<p>LED lights have been around since portable, hand held radios.</p>
<p>Putting them on cars and trucks on the dashboard happened a couple decades ago.</p>
<p>Putting them externally on vehicles happened before Audi&#8217;s sexy frontal placement.</p>
<p>As for trade dress, no car company copied Audi&#8217;s LED light designs.</p>
<p>You lose troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dewayne</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dewayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well this guy is an ass. I am ashamed to even be on the same planet as him. Time to cancel my Forbes subscription since they have idiots writing for them]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this guy is an ass. I am ashamed to even be on the same planet as him. Time to cancel my Forbes subscription since they have idiots writing for them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sdfg</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sdfg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Apple has never copied anyone. From copying MS with Numbers a spreadsheet program... They copied Adobe with arrange layers (send to back, etc.)... They copied NEC who invented the laptop in 1989... They copied the LG Prada phone with the iPhone... Nokia invented the app store in 2005... They copied Sony with a camera on a cell phone... They copied Samsung with sending photos by text message and background music on a phone... Nokia invented the internal cell phone antennae... Xerox invented the GUI... On and on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Apple has never copied anyone. From copying MS with Numbers a spreadsheet program&#8230; They copied Adobe with arrange layers (send to back, etc.)&#8230; They copied NEC who invented the laptop in 1989&#8230; They copied the LG Prada phone with the iPhone&#8230; Nokia invented the app store in 2005&#8230; They copied Sony with a camera on a cell phone&#8230; They copied Samsung with sending photos by text message and background music on a phone&#8230; Nokia invented the internal cell phone antennae&#8230; Xerox invented the GUI&#8230; On and on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dany</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dany]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haydn Shaughnessy is not an artist.. he doesn&#039;t even have an idea what the word design mean..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haydn Shaughnessy is not an artist.. he doesn&#8217;t even have an idea what the word design mean..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CupertinoJoe</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CupertinoJoe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone comparing to cars. Have you not noticed how Audi came out with ropelight type LEDs on the front of thier cars two years ago. Have you noticed Mercedes, BMW, and lexus introduced the same look this year? You think BMW is suing? I don&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone comparing to cars. Have you not noticed how Audi came out with ropelight type LEDs on the front of thier cars two years ago. Have you noticed Mercedes, BMW, and lexus introduced the same look this year? You think BMW is suing? I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoop dogg</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snoop dogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a rubbish article. Samsung is a copy cat, however they have nothing to match the vibrant Eco system of iTunes and app stores. Copy that Samsung, such a low rate company]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a rubbish article. Samsung is a copy cat, however they have nothing to match the vibrant Eco system of iTunes and app stores. Copy that Samsung, such a low rate company</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanmac</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kanmac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“If Apple had really been in the design business then they’d have seen Samsung’s copy as sheer flattery (at least at the trade dress level) and moved on to the next iteration,” Haydn Shaughnessy writes for Forbes. “Design is fashion, a peculiar form of intellectual property that wavers and transforms by the season.”  etc., etc., .................

Using his thoughts, I&#039;m going to copy everything he writes and publish it as my own. You have a problem with that Mr. Shaughnessy?

Tough. Move on. Create.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“If Apple had really been in the design business then they’d have seen Samsung’s copy as sheer flattery (at least at the trade dress level) and moved on to the next iteration,” Haydn Shaughnessy writes for Forbes. “Design is fashion, a peculiar form of intellectual property that wavers and transforms by the season.”  etc., etc., &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Using his thoughts, I&#8217;m going to copy everything he writes and publish it as my own. You have a problem with that Mr. Shaughnessy?</p>
<p>Tough. Move on. Create.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent Provocateur</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1028049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agent Provocateur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I happen to think Apple’s icon designs are superlative but no more so than Chris Bangle’s designs for BMW – now take a close look at Opel, which are as similar to BMW as Audi are to Mercedes and not just because Opel designers finally know how to do curves – more importantly they have the technology to bend the metal like BMW does”

1- Chris Bangle has now happily left BMW after he ruined their styling and made $70,000 BMWs look like mutant Toyotas. 
2- Opel is Government Motors- the German Edition. It only flatters/fools itself if it thinks it competes with Audi, BMW &amp; Mercedes.
3-Audis do not look any more like a Mercedes than any 2 cars with doors a trunk and a hood might. If you cannot see the difference, you need to see an eye doctor.

What kind of efftard wrote this? SameSong&#039;s Fandroid Fake iFones were a direct ripoff of Apple&#039;s IP. If it were a song on YouTube Apple would have issued a take down notice on day 1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I happen to think Apple’s icon designs are superlative but no more so than Chris Bangle’s designs for BMW – now take a close look at Opel, which are as similar to BMW as Audi are to Mercedes and not just because Opel designers finally know how to do curves – more importantly they have the technology to bend the metal like BMW does”</p>
<p>1- Chris Bangle has now happily left BMW after he ruined their styling and made $70,000 BMWs look like mutant Toyotas.<br />
2- Opel is Government Motors- the German Edition. It only flatters/fools itself if it thinks it competes with Audi, BMW &amp; Mercedes.<br />
3-Audis do not look any more like a Mercedes than any 2 cars with doors a trunk and a hood might. If you cannot see the difference, you need to see an eye doctor.</p>
<p>What kind of efftard wrote this? SameSong&#8217;s Fandroid Fake iFones were a direct ripoff of Apple&#8217;s IP. If it were a song on YouTube Apple would have issued a take down notice on day 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vsp</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1028036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vsp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason why America is in deep trouble today is that for the past 3 decades it is been run through Wall Street&#039;s wisdom and backseat driving punditry living in ivory towers. Their version of &quot;competition&quot; always tend to reduce into market share and commodity prices. It looks good on paper for the short term but in the long run those who swallowed such shallow and hollow advice hook, line and sinker live to regret their choices. Wall Street punditry&#039;s take on &quot;competition&quot; is not sustainable. It leads to wastage of resources and spoilt the juvenile tendency of freetards to consume more than what is good for them.

The airline industry promised &quot;competition&quot; and each participant airline undertook crazy &quot;competitive&quot; measures to kill one another. Today the airline industry is one of the most inefficient sector in the economy. The airline industry suffers and the public has to endure this inefficiency.

The banking industry promised &quot;competition&quot; and they undertook risky competitive measures like the alchemy of converting bad loans into high-grade investment products. In the end Wall Street bankers tank the whole economy both domestically and internationally.

The PC industry promised &quot;competition&quot; but what we see is mediocre products at commodity prices. Tech giants like HP, IBM, Dell and Compaq who feed on such promises do not compete in a rational and moral sense but cause irreparable harm to themselves and to the country. Microsoft, the sustainer for these dimwits is itself now in a technology backwater. Google, which now take the mantle of Microsoft by promising &quot;free competition&quot; is killing domestic innovation and selling the country to foreigners like Samsung. Look at what Google&#039;s promise has wrought to domestic giants in the industry. All of them make losses and Samsung eats up the giant share of the Android lunch.

On the other hand, Apple which has never succumbed to Wall Street wiles and tech punditry actually practiced true competition. While the rest of the industry were sleeping, Apple with its innovative spirit managed to come out with world-smashing products one after another that others were awed to believe that Apple&#039;s design is the only way to produce a smartphone or a tablet. Therefore the only way to compete is to copy Apple&#039;s design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason why America is in deep trouble today is that for the past 3 decades it is been run through Wall Street&#8217;s wisdom and backseat driving punditry living in ivory towers. Their version of &#8220;competition&#8221; always tend to reduce into market share and commodity prices. It looks good on paper for the short term but in the long run those who swallowed such shallow and hollow advice hook, line and sinker live to regret their choices. Wall Street punditry&#8217;s take on &#8220;competition&#8221; is not sustainable. It leads to wastage of resources and spoilt the juvenile tendency of freetards to consume more than what is good for them.</p>
<p>The airline industry promised &#8220;competition&#8221; and each participant airline undertook crazy &#8220;competitive&#8221; measures to kill one another. Today the airline industry is one of the most inefficient sector in the economy. The airline industry suffers and the public has to endure this inefficiency.</p>
<p>The banking industry promised &#8220;competition&#8221; and they undertook risky competitive measures like the alchemy of converting bad loans into high-grade investment products. In the end Wall Street bankers tank the whole economy both domestically and internationally.</p>
<p>The PC industry promised &#8220;competition&#8221; but what we see is mediocre products at commodity prices. Tech giants like HP, IBM, Dell and Compaq who feed on such promises do not compete in a rational and moral sense but cause irreparable harm to themselves and to the country. Microsoft, the sustainer for these dimwits is itself now in a technology backwater. Google, which now take the mantle of Microsoft by promising &#8220;free competition&#8221; is killing domestic innovation and selling the country to foreigners like Samsung. Look at what Google&#8217;s promise has wrought to domestic giants in the industry. All of them make losses and Samsung eats up the giant share of the Android lunch.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Apple which has never succumbed to Wall Street wiles and tech punditry actually practiced true competition. While the rest of the industry were sleeping, Apple with its innovative spirit managed to come out with world-smashing products one after another that others were awed to believe that Apple&#8217;s design is the only way to produce a smartphone or a tablet. Therefore the only way to compete is to copy Apple&#8217;s design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1028034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1028034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imitation is not innovation.  Copying is not competition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imitation is not innovation.  Copying is not competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padraic Confrey</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1027997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Padraic Confrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And from the adage if you tell a lie long enough people will believe it is the truth.  Samsung sold so many of these things around the world people started to believe the lie that it was their design. And they did this with massive criminal intent by giving away these things for free. Pollute the market with enough of this crap and then it doesn&#039;t become what the original design and 
intent was.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And from the adage if you tell a lie long enough people will believe it is the truth.  Samsung sold so many of these things around the world people started to believe the lie that it was their design. And they did this with massive criminal intent by giving away these things for free. Pollute the market with enough of this crap and then it doesn&#8217;t become what the original design and<br />
intent was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Econ Tom</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1027988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Econ Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forbes has been seriously negative about Apple in many articles lately, has anyone else noticed? I don&#039;t know why. Maybe they should disclose financial interests of authors, editors, and owner? Capitalist Tool. Or Capitalist Tools? It has reached the point I just don&#039;t want to read anything from Forbes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forbes has been seriously negative about Apple in many articles lately, has anyone else noticed? I don&#8217;t know why. Maybe they should disclose financial interests of authors, editors, and owner? Capitalist Tool. Or Capitalist Tools? It has reached the point I just don&#8217;t want to read anything from Forbes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: opsono</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1027970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[opsono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. What a blithering asshole. Enough said about this cretin. English must be his fourth language.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. What a blithering asshole. Enough said about this cretin. English must be his fourth language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrapdroid</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1027968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrapdroid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haydn? Haydn??? Shaughnessy? 

Fuckin&#039; a, with a name like that no wonder they are a clueless, entitled little twat. Not only someone who has never produced anything worthwhile in their life, they are actually incapable of doing so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haydn? Haydn??? Shaughnessy? </p>
<p>Fuckin&#8217; a, with a name like that no wonder they are a clueless, entitled little twat. Not only someone who has never produced anything worthwhile in their life, they are actually incapable of doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmasters Apprentice</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Webmasters Apprentice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because they are Marxist zealots who believe that everything should belong to the people or the &#039;state&#039;.   Now please stand and sing the new national anthem: &quot;Imagine&quot; by John Lennon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they are Marxist zealots who believe that everything should belong to the people or the &#8216;state&#8217;.   Now please stand and sing the new national anthem: &#8220;Imagine&#8221; by John Lennon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Lindley</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1027955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M Lindley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung&#039;s &quot;flattery&quot; will end up being very expensive. Google asked them not to go there. I think I will copy Shaughnessy&#039;s words verbatim, put my name on it and sell it as mine. After all, sentence construction, choice of words, localized spelling are just a fashion, a peculiar form of intellectual property that undulates and morphs every few months. (my idea, really, I swear!). 

Shaughnessy is as big an a&amp;$hole as the members of the phone hardware design team at Samsung.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung&#8217;s &#8220;flattery&#8221; will end up being very expensive. Google asked them not to go there. I think I will copy Shaughnessy&#8217;s words verbatim, put my name on it and sell it as mine. After all, sentence construction, choice of words, localized spelling are just a fashion, a peculiar form of intellectual property that undulates and morphs every few months. (my idea, really, I swear!). </p>
<p>Shaughnessy is as big an a&amp;$hole as the members of the phone hardware design team at Samsung.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Other Steve</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1027948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Other Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m shocked that Forbes would print such mindless dribble that boggles the, well, mind.

Do Forbes editors even read what they publish?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m shocked that Forbes would print such mindless dribble that boggles the, well, mind.</p>
<p>Do Forbes editors even read what they publish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syke</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[syke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This person sounds like he own a bunch of Samsung electronics. Or you must be getting paid from Samsung to write this article!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This person sounds like he own a bunch of Samsung electronics. Or you must be getting paid from Samsung to write this article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael A. Robson</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1027944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael A. Robson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;“Design is fashion, a peculiar form of intellectual property that wavers and transforms by the season.”

Something tells me the &#039;Zen&#039;-inspired Steve Jobsian simplicity is not thought to be a &#039;trend&#039; around Apple Campuses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;“Design is fashion, a peculiar form of intellectual property that wavers and transforms by the season.”</p>
<p>Something tells me the &#8216;Zen&#8217;-inspired Steve Jobsian simplicity is not thought to be a &#8216;trend&#8217; around Apple Campuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckan</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-2/#comment-1027939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ckan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haydn Shaughnessy is brain less idiot. Can&#039;t he see what types of phones Samsung were making before iPhone came. I hope somebody robe his bank account and then police tell him to move on and dont mourn. If he is making money then why the hell he is complaining if somebody rob his bank account?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haydn Shaughnessy is brain less idiot. Can&#8217;t he see what types of phones Samsung were making before iPhone came. I hope somebody robe his bank account and then police tell him to move on and dont mourn. If he is making money then why the hell he is complaining if somebody rob his bank account?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twimoon1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[twimoon1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you. I wish I could tattoo that on the face of every one of the thousands of Android trolls out there.

No, use a cattle brand. Screw the tattoo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. I wish I could tattoo that on the face of every one of the thousands of Android trolls out there.</p>
<p>No, use a cattle brand. Screw the tattoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Currie</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Currie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;If Apple had really been in the design business then they’d have seen Samsung’s copy as sheer flattery&lt;/i&gt;

Another socialist dumdum. Sorry Haydn Shaughnessy who writes for Forbes, but you&#039;re a blithering idiot to not comprehend the deadly impact on creativity when what you create cannot be protected and of benefit to specifically the creator.

The big fat BLIND SPOT of socialist attitudes is the deadly impact of hard core socialism on INCENTIVE. Without incentive, there is NO creativity. You want an example?

&lt;b&gt;CHINA&lt;/b&gt;

Figure out why China: Criminal Nation, is entirely INCAPABLE of being creative/innovative no matter how well they educate their students. It&#039;s because totalitarian / communist / hard core socialist systems KILL INCENTIVE!

Wake up and smell the royalties from creating something. Take your idiotic &#039;flattery&#039; concept and shove it back up where it came from. If you can&#039;t conceive of why Samsung deserves all the hell it has inflicted on ITSELF, then why are you working for a &#039;business&#039; magazine? Has modern business become so corrupted and moronic that it has NO ability of self-evaluation? You certainly indicate that to be the case, Haydn Shaughnessy who writes for Forbes. Not good. 8O]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If Apple had really been in the design business then they’d have seen Samsung’s copy as sheer flattery</i></p>
<p>Another socialist dumdum. Sorry Haydn Shaughnessy who writes for Forbes, but you&#8217;re a blithering idiot to not comprehend the deadly impact on creativity when what you create cannot be protected and of benefit to specifically the creator.</p>
<p>The big fat BLIND SPOT of socialist attitudes is the deadly impact of hard core socialism on INCENTIVE. Without incentive, there is NO creativity. You want an example?</p>
<p><b>CHINA</b></p>
<p>Figure out why China: Criminal Nation, is entirely INCAPABLE of being creative/innovative no matter how well they educate their students. It&#8217;s because totalitarian / communist / hard core socialist systems KILL INCENTIVE!</p>
<p>Wake up and smell the royalties from creating something. Take your idiotic &#8216;flattery&#8217; concept and shove it back up where it came from. If you can&#8217;t conceive of why Samsung deserves all the hell it has inflicted on ITSELF, then why are you working for a &#8216;business&#8217; magazine? Has modern business become so corrupted and moronic that it has NO ability of self-evaluation? You certainly indicate that to be the case, Haydn Shaughnessy who writes for Forbes. Not good. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt='8O' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weezer</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weezer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sense your sarcasm but I actually agree with your idea. I don&#039;t think people should own intangabiles. The reason music piracy is more widely practiced than theft of physical CDs is not just to do with the chance of getting caught being lower it is also that it does not seem wrong to a lot of people. If Pythagoras refused to let anyone else use his method to calculate the height of a triangle from the length of the base and 2 known angles then where would we be?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sense your sarcasm but I actually agree with your idea. I don&#8217;t think people should own intangabiles. The reason music piracy is more widely practiced than theft of physical CDs is not just to do with the chance of getting caught being lower it is also that it does not seem wrong to a lot of people. If Pythagoras refused to let anyone else use his method to calculate the height of a triangle from the length of the base and 2 known angles then where would we be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silversurfer</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silversurfer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you sir have no idea what your talking about BMW&#039;s &quot;buck teeth&quot; or did you mean kidney- shaped double grills? If you can&#039;t distinguish between Ford, Chevy and Dodge grill designs then you must be living on another planet BTW Rolls Royce stole from the Lincoln grill design many years ago starting in 1938.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you sir have no idea what your talking about BMW&#8217;s &#8220;buck teeth&#8221; or did you mean kidney- shaped double grills? If you can&#8217;t distinguish between Ford, Chevy and Dodge grill designs then you must be living on another planet BTW Rolls Royce stole from the Lincoln grill design many years ago starting in 1938.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed SoL</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ed SoL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not that shape of the phone that is under dispute here. It is the graphic user interface (GUI) and the way the GUI has been designed that is the question. Apple was granted patent #8,223,134 on 18 July 2012. 

In addition, Apple is not and cannot sue others that has the same design as their Macbook Air, which is the ultra-thin notebooks. Read this article to understand more about the battle of the &quot;MBA&quot; - http://english.cw.com.tw/article.do?action=show&amp;id=13106.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not that shape of the phone that is under dispute here. It is the graphic user interface (GUI) and the way the GUI has been designed that is the question. Apple was granted patent #8,223,134 on 18 July 2012. </p>
<p>In addition, Apple is not and cannot sue others that has the same design as their Macbook Air, which is the ultra-thin notebooks. Read this article to understand more about the battle of the &#8220;MBA&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://english.cw.com.tw/article.do?action=show&#038;id=13106" rel="nofollow">http://english.cw.com.tw/article.do?action=show&#038;id=13106</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webstyr</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[webstyr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, according to Shaughnessy Mercedes Benz should have no problem with Kia placing their three pointed star &quot;design&quot; of their company logo on the hood of Kia&#039;s crummy little crapmoblie since the Mercedes Benz logo is just a &quot;design&quot;. What an idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, according to Shaughnessy Mercedes Benz should have no problem with Kia placing their three pointed star &#8220;design&#8221; of their company logo on the hood of Kia&#8217;s crummy little crapmoblie since the Mercedes Benz logo is just a &#8220;design&#8221;. What an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Passing By</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Passing By]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick, I congratulate you for paying no attention to NHL.  While I disagree with some of your points, you expressed your views respectfully.  When having a disagreement, the person who resorts to name calling and using profanity loses. (And not everyone who responded to your post has.)  I have always believed those folks who use profanity and name calling are not intelligent enough to otherwise defend their position and they are not worth your time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick, I congratulate you for paying no attention to NHL.  While I disagree with some of your points, you expressed your views respectfully.  When having a disagreement, the person who resorts to name calling and using profanity loses. (And not everyone who responded to your post has.)  I have always believed those folks who use profanity and name calling are not intelligent enough to otherwise defend their position and they are not worth your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recision</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Recision]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anybody who lauds Chris Bangle instantly brands themselves an idiot.  You can stop reading and disregard from right there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody who lauds Chris Bangle instantly brands themselves an idiot.  You can stop reading and disregard from right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beaman</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beaman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NHL!  I have not laughed that hard in years.  That was so good my wife had to wipe the tears from my eye, pick me off the floor and help me to breath again before I died.  Thanks for making my day!  Rick of course may not feel the same. :0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NHL!  I have not laughed that hard in years.  That was so good my wife had to wipe the tears from my eye, pick me off the floor and help me to breath again before I died.  Thanks for making my day!  Rick of course may not feel the same. :0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JebusR</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JebusR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read the article. Were they ever awarded the patent?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the article. Were they ever awarded the patent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: castelbuono</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[castelbuono]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is the concept of &quot;stealing&quot; so elusive to these blogger trolls?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the concept of &#8220;stealing&#8221; so elusive to these blogger trolls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordthree</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027898</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lordthree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 04:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Educate yourself

http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/02/17/in-depth-analysis-androids-notification-bar-patent-and-how-apple-may-or-may-not-infringe-it/

Google didn&#039;t come up with it and doesn&#039;t have a patent]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Educate yourself</p>
<p><a href="http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/02/17/in-depth-analysis-androids-notification-bar-patent-and-how-apple-may-or-may-not-infringe-it/" rel="nofollow">http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/02/17/in-depth-analysis-androids-notification-bar-patent-and-how-apple-may-or-may-not-infringe-it/</a></p>
<p>Google didn&#8217;t come up with it and doesn&#8217;t have a patent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannahjs</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hannahjs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 04:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attack the Buddha, for only then shall we be remembered in song. From our own feeble lights, we will obtain only oblivion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attack the Buddha, for only then shall we be remembered in song. From our own feeble lights, we will obtain only oblivion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Cayes</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les Cayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 04:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung synpathisers. Move on. Accept the verdict.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung synpathisers. Move on. Accept the verdict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbubbadude</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigbubbadude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 04:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Maybe if they were a bunch of losers whose design advantage had been unfairly appropriated and now they had no cash for the kids’ school fees, then there would be a cause for sympathy. But this is is the most valuable company in history. &quot;

So copyright protection should only be extended to the unsuccessful? There is something very wrong with this line of thinking- that rule of law does not apply- sympathy should pick winners and losers, not the truth. This is a fundemental problem with western cultures: Success means you are evil and should be brought down. Here in Asia I do not see that as much. Success is considered something to strive for. Maybe that&#039;s why countries here get more productive, while the West stagnates. Apple went from the margins to the richest company by designing products people enjoyed and wanted to buy. So now that makes them evil in the minds of journalists? Tell me, at what  point in history did the design team go from brilliant and good to evil and pathetic? Was it the moment you wanted to buy their products? All Hail to the mediocre! Good luck with that line of thinking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Maybe if they were a bunch of losers whose design advantage had been unfairly appropriated and now they had no cash for the kids’ school fees, then there would be a cause for sympathy. But this is is the most valuable company in history. &#8221;</p>
<p>So copyright protection should only be extended to the unsuccessful? There is something very wrong with this line of thinking- that rule of law does not apply- sympathy should pick winners and losers, not the truth. This is a fundemental problem with western cultures: Success means you are evil and should be brought down. Here in Asia I do not see that as much. Success is considered something to strive for. Maybe that&#8217;s why countries here get more productive, while the West stagnates. Apple went from the margins to the richest company by designing products people enjoyed and wanted to buy. So now that makes them evil in the minds of journalists? Tell me, at what  point in history did the design team go from brilliant and good to evil and pathetic? Was it the moment you wanted to buy their products? All Hail to the mediocre! Good luck with that line of thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NHL</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NHL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Apple’s creativity seems to be lacking as of late.&quot;
Yes, Rick, I&#039;m sure you&#039;re quite concerned about Apple&#039;s recent lack of creativity.
So concerned, are you, that you feel that Samsung should be able to profit from Apple&#039;s &quot;uncreative&quot; ideas. 
Heck, when Apple markets a product, you imply that it&#039;s a sign of lack of creativity. But when Samsung can&#039;t even market its own design, and instead sells copies of Apple&#039;s &quot;uncreative&quot; products, that&#039;s just good business and good for the consumer, right Rick?
Rick, I am tempted to call you a piece of shit. But I&#039;m sorry, you are not a piece of shit. You see, pieces of shit have at least &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; value. Shit can be used as fertiliser, fuel, even artistic material. No Rick, you are not a piece of shit. 
You Sir, are merely a smear on the underpants of civil society.
Good day to you, Rick, you snivelling excuse for a Troll.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Apple’s creativity seems to be lacking as of late.&#8221;<br />
Yes, Rick, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re quite concerned about Apple&#8217;s recent lack of creativity.<br />
So concerned, are you, that you feel that Samsung should be able to profit from Apple&#8217;s &#8220;uncreative&#8221; ideas.<br />
Heck, when Apple markets a product, you imply that it&#8217;s a sign of lack of creativity. But when Samsung can&#8217;t even market its own design, and instead sells copies of Apple&#8217;s &#8220;uncreative&#8221; products, that&#8217;s just good business and good for the consumer, right Rick?<br />
Rick, I am tempted to call you a piece of shit. But I&#8217;m sorry, you are not a piece of shit. You see, pieces of shit have at least <i>some</i> value. Shit can be used as fertiliser, fuel, even artistic material. No Rick, you are not a piece of shit.<br />
You Sir, are merely a smear on the underpants of civil society.<br />
Good day to you, Rick, you snivelling excuse for a Troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davewrite</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davewrite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so if apple copied googles Search algorithms this writer and Google will be happy right?

manufacturers should be able to make clones of Intel chips, copies of Windows for free and I can copy this writers -- Forbes - post and put my name on it and collect ad revenue right?

according to this writer Forbes shouldn&#039;t sue me for copying its articles instead they should just concentrate on CREATING NEW stuff (which I can also copy? ).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so if apple copied googles Search algorithms this writer and Google will be happy right?</p>
<p>manufacturers should be able to make clones of Intel chips, copies of Windows for free and I can copy this writers &#8212; Forbes &#8211; post and put my name on it and collect ad revenue right?</p>
<p>according to this writer Forbes shouldn&#8217;t sue me for copying its articles instead they should just concentrate on CREATING NEW stuff (which I can also copy? ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasad</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prasad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What notification bar? 
Im sure Google would sue had they patent it. 
Ya you know better than Google what they developed :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What notification bar?<br />
Im sure Google would sue had they patent it.<br />
Ya you know better than Google what they developed <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grigori</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grigori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was, frankly, one of the most laughable of this recent spate of articles I&#039;ve read so far, even if unintentionally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was, frankly, one of the most laughable of this recent spate of articles I&#8217;ve read so far, even if unintentionally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NHL</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NHL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I just wish all the money and time spent on lawsuits could be channeled into creating new and cool stuff.&quot;
Rick, you&#039;re either playing at disingenuousness, or you are stupider than sand in spaghetti.
Apple channeled their money (and time and energy and genius) into &quot;creating new and cool stuff&quot;. 
Samsung then stole Apple&#039;s work, and marketed it as their own.
Why should Apple spend any more money on &quot;creating new and cool stuff&quot; just so that other companies can steal Apple&#039;s work and ideas, and take Apple&#039;s market share and sales, with Apple&#039;s own ideas?
You&#039;re not really that stupid or unethical, Rick. 
So what&#039;s your motivation for pretending to be?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I just wish all the money and time spent on lawsuits could be channeled into creating new and cool stuff.&#8221;<br />
Rick, you&#8217;re either playing at disingenuousness, or you are stupider than sand in spaghetti.<br />
Apple channeled their money (and time and energy and genius) into &#8220;creating new and cool stuff&#8221;.<br />
Samsung then stole Apple&#8217;s work, and marketed it as their own.<br />
Why should Apple spend any more money on &#8220;creating new and cool stuff&#8221; just so that other companies can steal Apple&#8217;s work and ideas, and take Apple&#8217;s market share and sales, with Apple&#8217;s own ideas?<br />
You&#8217;re not really that stupid or unethical, Rick.<br />
So what&#8217;s your motivation for pretending to be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff II</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff II]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...giggle...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...giggle...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff II</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/why-the-apple-vs-samsung-verdict-is-a-big-mistake-or-something/comment-page-1/#comment-1027869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff II]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88675#comment-1027869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@AmericanJoe:  Right on.  All the high-end car marques have taken extreme measure to protect their trade dress; in particular, the style of their grilles.  Look at the BMW&#039;s buck teeth.  Look at Mercedes&#039; waffle iron.  Look at the distinctive Rolls grille.  Then ask yourself if you could tell a Chevrolet from a Dodge or a Ford by looking at the grilles from any model year of the past 50 years.  You can&#039;t and those are the nadir of automotive design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AmericanJoe:  Right on.  All the high-end car marques have taken extreme measure to protect their trade dress; in particular, the style of their grilles.  Look at the BMW&#8217;s buck teeth.  Look at Mercedes&#8217; waffle iron.  Look at the distinctive Rolls grille.  Then ask yourself if you could tell a Chevrolet from a Dodge or a Ford by looking at the grilles from any model year of the past 50 years.  You can&#8217;t and those are the nadir of automotive design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
