<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tim Bajarin: Apple could eventually dump Samsung as a component supplier altogether</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irish Mike</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1030571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irish Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 03:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1030571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would they dump them. If the parts they are supplying are good quality, and reliable why would they switch. Anyway this Patten nonsense is just hiding the fact the basic design of the iPhone hasn&#039;t changed in years which has been other companies major downfalls. The British car industry can verify that. Time to stop thinking about the past and make the iPhone 5 really stand out besides bigger screens, capacity etc or im going back to Nokia. Plus all you people on here should remember apple now pays Nokia for its infringement on every iPhone sold so its not entirely squeeky clean either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would they dump them. If the parts they are supplying are good quality, and reliable why would they switch. Anyway this Patten nonsense is just hiding the fact the basic design of the iPhone hasn&#8217;t changed in years which has been other companies major downfalls. The British car industry can verify that. Time to stop thinking about the past and make the iPhone 5 really stand out besides bigger screens, capacity etc or im going back to Nokia. Plus all you people on here should remember apple now pays Nokia for its infringement on every iPhone sold so its not entirely squeeky clean either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlimblck</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlimblck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ weezer 

&quot;If apple really think that Samsung products look too similar they should just change the design on every phone instead of every second one.

why? why should apple change its design because samsung is violating the law by copying them?

in Picassos cubist period, he worked with Braque, it can be said they developed cubism together. Neither ripped each other off. PIcasso&#039;s Les Demoiselles d&#039;Avignon is considered the first proto cubist (i.e the forerunner of the cubist movement). Neither of them had &#039;rights&#039; to the movement or can be considered the &#039;creator&#039; over the other. 

Picasso left the movement and his later works were very distinct. 

I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re getting at with picasso braque but they hardly have anything to do with samsung. Apple didn&#039;t set up a studio with Samsung to develop the iPhone together. Apple designed the iPhone by themselves and samsung stole as even the jury agreed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ weezer </p>
<p>&#8220;If apple really think that Samsung products look too similar they should just change the design on every phone instead of every second one.</p>
<p>why? why should apple change its design because samsung is violating the law by copying them?</p>
<p>in Picassos cubist period, he worked with Braque, it can be said they developed cubism together. Neither ripped each other off. PIcasso&#8217;s Les Demoiselles d&#8217;Avignon is considered the first proto cubist (i.e the forerunner of the cubist movement). Neither of them had &#8216;rights&#8217; to the movement or can be considered the &#8216;creator&#8217; over the other. </p>
<p>Picasso left the movement and his later works were very distinct. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re getting at with picasso braque but they hardly have anything to do with samsung. Apple didn&#8217;t set up a studio with Samsung to develop the iPhone together. Apple designed the iPhone by themselves and samsung stole as even the jury agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felipe carlos</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[felipe carlos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat, I highly doubt Apple&#039;s reputation for innovation, ease of use, design simplicity, manufacturing engineering/quality, superior software/os&#039;s, device compatibility, and customer service have a single thing to do with Samsung parts &quot;under the hood.&quot; Customers simply don&#039;t know, for the most part, who sources the components, just like a car buyer doesn&#039;t know what supplier built the alternator or air conditioner compressor under the hood of his car...and frankly, doesn&#039;t care. To suggest that Apple couldn&#039;t charge the prices they do for their products if people didn&#039;t think Samsung parts were inside, well, you&#039;re delusional.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, I highly doubt Apple&#8217;s reputation for innovation, ease of use, design simplicity, manufacturing engineering/quality, superior software/os&#8217;s, device compatibility, and customer service have a single thing to do with Samsung parts &#8220;under the hood.&#8221; Customers simply don&#8217;t know, for the most part, who sources the components, just like a car buyer doesn&#8217;t know what supplier built the alternator or air conditioner compressor under the hood of his car&#8230;and frankly, doesn&#8217;t care. To suggest that Apple couldn&#8217;t charge the prices they do for their products if people didn&#8217;t think Samsung parts were inside, well, you&#8217;re delusional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Total mac</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Total mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a business owner myself, if I had a contract with a supplier who becomes a competitor I would drop them so fast their feet wouldn&#039;t touch the floor. 

I can guarantee that apple has a date in their iCal When Samsung will be dropped for ALL components they supply to apple. 

I reckon within. 6 months apple won&#039;t e dealing with Samsung at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a business owner myself, if I had a contract with a supplier who becomes a competitor I would drop them so fast their feet wouldn&#8217;t touch the floor. </p>
<p>I can guarantee that apple has a date in their iCal When Samsung will be dropped for ALL components they supply to apple. </p>
<p>I reckon within. 6 months apple won&#8217;t e dealing with Samsung at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weezer</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weezer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Picasso was part of the cubist movement. To the uninitiated paintings from other cubist artists could easily be confused for picassos. If you covered the signatures of paintings by Braque and Picasso then asked an uneducated jury of Americans chosen at random to tell them apart I think they may struggle. If apple really think that Samsung products look too similar they should just change the design on every phone instead of every second one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picasso was part of the cubist movement. To the uninitiated paintings from other cubist artists could easily be confused for picassos. If you covered the signatures of paintings by Braque and Picasso then asked an uneducated jury of Americans chosen at random to tell them apart I think they may struggle. If apple really think that Samsung products look too similar they should just change the design on every phone instead of every second one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Total mac</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Total mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[peoe are passionate about Aaple because when you use their product you relapse very quickly that nothing can touch them from any other company. 

You talk about the &#039;apple fanboys and cult&#039; but what you should be doing is encouraging apples competitors to design and make better products!

I&#039;ve tried all of apples competitors over te years and NONE of them offers the amazing user experience and quality of design that apple does. 

Android OS sucks if you&#039;ve ever used and apple IOS device.  Android is in beta stage compared to IOS and the reason why IOS will always be better is that apple is a software and hardware company NOT a search company. 

Face the facts, google will Newr be apple and apple will never  be google. 

Google should have stuck to search, it&#039;s their only specialism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>peoe are passionate about Aaple because when you use their product you relapse very quickly that nothing can touch them from any other company. </p>
<p>You talk about the &#8216;apple fanboys and cult&#8217; but what you should be doing is encouraging apples competitors to design and make better products!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried all of apples competitors over te years and NONE of them offers the amazing user experience and quality of design that apple does. </p>
<p>Android OS sucks if you&#8217;ve ever used and apple IOS device.  Android is in beta stage compared to IOS and the reason why IOS will always be better is that apple is a software and hardware company NOT a search company. </p>
<p>Face the facts, google will Newr be apple and apple will never  be google. </p>
<p>Google should have stuck to search, it&#8217;s their only specialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRONOS</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KRONOS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t feed the troll...

Pat has the &quot;most posts&quot; on here because Shitdung pays him by the word to post here...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t feed the troll&#8230;</p>
<p>Pat has the &#8220;most posts&#8221; on here because Shitdung pays him by the word to post here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRONOS</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KRONOS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, Pat,

Go Fsck yourself!

Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Pat,</p>
<p>Go Fsck yourself!</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRONOS</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KRONOS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 04:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat (i.e., Asshole),

Why do you even bother to post your anti-Apple diatribe, diahrea bullshit on this forum?  Oh yes, I remember- you&#039;re a Scamscum paid troll that just showed up on this forum when the Apple vs. Shitdung began and get paid by the word.
Again- ESAD and just go the Fsck away]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat (i.e., Asshole),</p>
<p>Why do you even bother to post your anti-Apple diatribe, diahrea bullshit on this forum?  Oh yes, I remember- you&#8217;re a Scamscum paid troll that just showed up on this forum when the Apple vs. Shitdung began and get paid by the word.<br />
Again- ESAD and just go the Fsck away</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaAttendee</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aaAttendee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent observation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davewrite</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davewrite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat, lets not diverge all over the place:

so going back to your comment in another article where you said  &quot;Apple cannot take on everyone and think it can win.”

(http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/apple-kicks-googles-android-in-the-teeth-1-05-billion-jury-award-may-really-be-worth-450-billion/#eej2ahZ0RPQqv0Jw.99)

I said :
&quot;iPod.

iPod beat Sony, Toshiba, iRiver, Creative Nomad, Phillips, Saehan, Archos, Samsung, Cowon, Msft Zune, Sandisk, etc etc. Note that companies like Sony were huge, had extensive audio manufacturing – sony sold tens of millions of Walkman every year and STILL got beat by by an apple which in those days was much much smaller than it is now&quot;

well? I&#039;m a piece of work.. when I show how retard your arguments are?

like I said your posts are full of nonsense.


no wonder gm is in such shat trouble with &#039;tards like you working for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, lets not diverge all over the place:</p>
<p>so going back to your comment in another article where you said  &#8220;Apple cannot take on everyone and think it can win.”</p>
<p>(<a href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/apple-kicks-googles-android-in-the-teeth-1-05-billion-jury-award-may-really-be-worth-450-billion/#eej2ahZ0RPQqv0Jw.99" rel="nofollow">http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/apple-kicks-googles-android-in-the-teeth-1-05-billion-jury-award-may-really-be-worth-450-billion/#eej2ahZ0RPQqv0Jw.99</a>)</p>
<p>I said :<br />
&#8220;iPod.</p>
<p>iPod beat Sony, Toshiba, iRiver, Creative Nomad, Phillips, Saehan, Archos, Samsung, Cowon, Msft Zune, Sandisk, etc etc. Note that companies like Sony were huge, had extensive audio manufacturing – sony sold tens of millions of Walkman every year and STILL got beat by by an apple which in those days was much much smaller than it is now&#8221;</p>
<p>well? I&#8217;m a piece of work.. when I show how retard your arguments are?</p>
<p>like I said your posts are full of nonsense.</p>
<p>no wonder gm is in such shat trouble with &#8216;tards like you working for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flimbiss</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flimbiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[like I said who is the &#039;cultist?&#039;

a retard of an apple hater who posts and posts hate on an Apple FAN site?

or apple fans praising apple?

a psycho doc is near you -- please get help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like I said who is the &#8216;cultist?&#8217;</p>
<p>a retard of an apple hater who posts and posts hate on an Apple FAN site?</p>
<p>or apple fans praising apple?</p>
<p>a psycho doc is near you &#8212; please get help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flimbiss</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flimbiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my dear Pat

again who is the fanatic the apple fan that posts on an Apple FAN SITE or an apple hater who posts over and over here?

don&#039;t worry! 
a psychiatrist is near you!

(your delusions of being a VP of GM who doesn&#039;t even know its supply chain which a commentator can dig out in 5 minutes... you need help.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my dear Pat</p>
<p>again who is the fanatic the apple fan that posts on an Apple FAN SITE or an apple hater who posts over and over here?</p>
<p>don&#8217;t worry!<br />
a psychiatrist is near you!</p>
<p>(your delusions of being a VP of GM who doesn&#8217;t even know its supply chain which a commentator can dig out in 5 minutes&#8230; you need help.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They would run of work for these plants if they relied solely on Apple products and retrofitting plants every time you make changes or introduce new products get very expensive.

Remember that Apple does not have money, shareholders do and what you propose would need a strong value proposition for them to want to fund the kinds of costs that state of the art foundries would cost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They would run of work for these plants if they relied solely on Apple products and retrofitting plants every time you make changes or introduce new products get very expensive.</p>
<p>Remember that Apple does not have money, shareholders do and what you propose would need a strong value proposition for them to want to fund the kinds of costs that state of the art foundries would cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are a piece of work!  All I try to do is to remove the Cult member tone to comments posted on MDN and that just get&#039;s you upset as Cult members do not like to be challenged.  

Watching TV and typing on my mid 2011 MBA 13&quot; with the top rated Samsung 256 G SSD (coe s and not t for Toshiba), Samsung display, Samsung Chispets and Samsung RAM.

Could also be typing on my 2012 MPB 15 D fully loaded or my iPad or my iPhone.  Simply put, use Apple but not an Apple Fan Boy!  Sorry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a piece of work!  All I try to do is to remove the Cult member tone to comments posted on MDN and that just get&#8217;s you upset as Cult members do not like to be challenged.  </p>
<p>Watching TV and typing on my mid 2011 MBA 13&#8243; with the top rated Samsung 256 G SSD (coe s and not t for Toshiba), Samsung display, Samsung Chispets and Samsung RAM.</p>
<p>Could also be typing on my 2012 MPB 15 D fully loaded or my iPad or my iPhone.  Simply put, use Apple but not an Apple Fan Boy!  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you get home schooled?  You demonstrate a complete lack of intelligence when you write this way.  My role at GM was finance and indeed Nexteer was a parts supplier to the competition, competition that we never sued!

I am wasting time with a Cult member like you.  Drink the Kool-Aid and happy dreams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you get home schooled?  You demonstrate a complete lack of intelligence when you write this way.  My role at GM was finance and indeed Nexteer was a parts supplier to the competition, competition that we never sued!</p>
<p>I am wasting time with a Cult member like you.  Drink the Kool-Aid and happy dreams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Lord long on words that mean nothing!   Getting into the minds of Apple Fan Boys is a form of entertainment as it clearly solicits rebuttals like yours which closely resembles what  Cult Member a la Church of Scientology would do.

I have nothing but respect for Apple and their products but still cannot believe the disciples that speak of Apple as the second coming!  You have to admit that this is freaky and a scary human condition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Lord long on words that mean nothing!   Getting into the minds of Apple Fan Boys is a form of entertainment as it clearly solicits rebuttals like yours which closely resembles what  Cult Member a la Church of Scientology would do.</p>
<p>I have nothing but respect for Apple and their products but still cannot believe the disciples that speak of Apple as the second coming!  You have to admit that this is freaky and a scary human condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once rumors swirled that Sony would be a good takeover target for Apple.  That possibility would be intriguing if Sony still has the design &amp; manufacturing aptitude that brought it to the fore 30 years ago.  Of course, Panasonic seems to be a better fit since a tie-up with Sony would mean that Apple would have to support technologies that it pretends to dislike, such as optical discs, playstations, cameras, a full suite of home &amp; car audio equipment, etc - not to mention a LOT of pro-level equipment for studios &amp; broadcasting, medical imaging, etc that online fanboys know nothing about.  ...All areas that Apple claims, at best, to &quot;be a hobby&quot; or chooses not to serve.

It&#039;s a shame, really, that Apple can&#039;t get serious about non-consumer tech-intensive markets.  There is profit to be had there (a Sony Trimaster OLED display can run up to $26,000), it&#039;s just a lot more work than Apple seems willing to expend.  Sad, really.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once rumors swirled that Sony would be a good takeover target for Apple.  That possibility would be intriguing if Sony still has the design &amp; manufacturing aptitude that brought it to the fore 30 years ago.  Of course, Panasonic seems to be a better fit since a tie-up with Sony would mean that Apple would have to support technologies that it pretends to dislike, such as optical discs, playstations, cameras, a full suite of home &amp; car audio equipment, etc &#8211; not to mention a LOT of pro-level equipment for studios &amp; broadcasting, medical imaging, etc that online fanboys know nothing about.  &#8230;All areas that Apple claims, at best, to &#8220;be a hobby&#8221; or chooses not to serve.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame, really, that Apple can&#8217;t get serious about non-consumer tech-intensive markets.  There is profit to be had there (a Sony Trimaster OLED display can run up to $26,000), it&#8217;s just a lot more work than Apple seems willing to expend.  Sad, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat

&quot;Ex GM Canada VP here &quot;

eh...
 if you&#039;re really a GM VP..

you&#039;re proud member of  company brought back from bankruptcy by government (taxpayer) bailouts criticizing the strategies of  Apple --  you know the record breaking profit making company with 110 billion in the bank?

maybe GM woud be better condition if they hired apple junior managers to run it instead of morons like you?

lol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat</p>
<p>&#8220;Ex GM Canada VP here &#8221;</p>
<p>eh&#8230;<br />
 if you&#8217;re really a GM VP..</p>
<p>you&#8217;re proud member of  company brought back from bankruptcy by government (taxpayer) bailouts criticizing the strategies of  Apple &#8212;  you know the record breaking profit making company with 110 billion in the bank?</p>
<p>maybe GM woud be better condition if they hired apple junior managers to run it instead of morons like you?</p>
<p>lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davewrite</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davewrite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[unfortunately a big chunk of samsung is family owned so stock holders have limited clout. 

the  samsung family is a dispicable tribe: go google all the lawsuits the various multi millionaire branches of the family have launched against EACH OTHER.

the head of Samsung have been convicted of all kinds of chargers from fraud etc by the Korean Govt. He was PARDONED  by the president of Korea. (samsung controlls 20% of Koreans GDP and politcians, courts - re: recent lawsuit against apple - don&#039;t dare to fart without samsungs approval . It must have been a bloody big shock for samsung&#039;s azzhats to have anyone like steve Jobs to stand up to them)

wikiepedia:

:&quot;n July 16, 2008, The New York Times reported that the Seoul Central District Court found him (Chariman of samsung)  guilty on charges of financial wrongdoing and tax evasion. Prosecutors requested that Lee be sentenced to seven years in prison and fined $347 million. The court fined him $109 million and sentenced him to 3 years suspended jail time. Lee has not responded to the verdict.[5]
On December 29, 2009, the South Korean government moved to pardon Lee Kun-hee.&quot;

this is the company guys like PAT are defending. 

(I worked for years in asia and loved many things about asia but companies like samsung are an exception)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunately a big chunk of samsung is family owned so stock holders have limited clout. </p>
<p>the  samsung family is a dispicable tribe: go google all the lawsuits the various multi millionaire branches of the family have launched against EACH OTHER.</p>
<p>the head of Samsung have been convicted of all kinds of chargers from fraud etc by the Korean Govt. He was PARDONED  by the president of Korea. (samsung controlls 20% of Koreans GDP and politcians, courts &#8211; re: recent lawsuit against apple &#8211; don&#8217;t dare to fart without samsungs approval . It must have been a bloody big shock for samsung&#8217;s azzhats to have anyone like steve Jobs to stand up to them)</p>
<p>wikiepedia:</p>
<p>:&#8221;n July 16, 2008, The New York Times reported that the Seoul Central District Court found him (Chariman of samsung)  guilty on charges of financial wrongdoing and tax evasion. Prosecutors requested that Lee be sentenced to seven years in prison and fined $347 million. The court fined him $109 million and sentenced him to 3 years suspended jail time. Lee has not responded to the verdict.[5]<br />
On December 29, 2009, the South Korean government moved to pardon Lee Kun-hee.&#8221;</p>
<p>this is the company guys like PAT are defending. </p>
<p>(I worked for years in asia and loved many things about asia but companies like samsung are an exception)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flimbiss</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flimbiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat

&quot;Listen Apple Cult members&quot;

DUDE this is an Apple FAN site.
so if you don&#039;t like apple fans WTF are you posting here?

you&#039;re an apple hater yet you have the most posts here (an apple fan site) so who is more cult like or crazy fanatic?

apple fans who praise apple on an apple fan site or an apple hater i.e you PAT who posts here and posts the most?

think about it

what are you : &quot;Cult of Apple Hate&quot;? 
you seriously need some psycho help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat</p>
<p>&#8220;Listen Apple Cult members&#8221;</p>
<p>DUDE this is an Apple FAN site.<br />
so if you don&#8217;t like apple fans WTF are you posting here?</p>
<p>you&#8217;re an apple hater yet you have the most posts here (an apple fan site) so who is more cult like or crazy fanatic?</p>
<p>apple fans who praise apple on an apple fan site or an apple hater i.e you PAT who posts here and posts the most?</p>
<p>think about it</p>
<p>what are you : &#8220;Cult of Apple Hate&#8221;?<br />
you seriously need some psycho help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordthree</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lordthree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thats not even a Steve Jobs quote. You look like a fucking fool when you continuously spread bad information around.

He was quoting Pablo Picasso. You&#039;re distortion field is pretty heavy. If someone repeats something, or &#039;quotes&#039; someone, then the quote is attributed to the original person. You&#039;re taking it out of context and trying to spin it that this was some fundamental truth that Steve had coined on his own in regards to policy. Gtfo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats not even a Steve Jobs quote. You look like a fucking fool when you continuously spread bad information around.</p>
<p>He was quoting Pablo Picasso. You&#8217;re distortion field is pretty heavy. If someone repeats something, or &#8216;quotes&#8217; someone, then the quote is attributed to the original person. You&#8217;re taking it out of context and trying to spin it that this was some fundamental truth that Steve had coined on his own in regards to policy. Gtfo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phareen</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phareen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so you actually didn&#039;t see Jobs interview where he said the PIcasso quote or understood it?

go attend art 101.

I&#039;ve got a BA in studio art and BFA in art and art history.

my infatuation with apple???
you dislike apple and you post all over on a MAC FAN WEBSITE..  and you talk about infatuation?

I&#039;m posting here as I&#039;m apple fan and spend lots of time conversing with other apple fans, you dislike apple and you&#039;re spending bonks of time posting in numerous MDN article forums and you say others have &#039;infatuation&#039; ???? . Man, who has got the issues here?

rotfl !!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so you actually didn&#8217;t see Jobs interview where he said the PIcasso quote or understood it?</p>
<p>go attend art 101.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a BA in studio art and BFA in art and art history.</p>
<p>my infatuation with apple???<br />
you dislike apple and you post all over on a MAC FAN WEBSITE..  and you talk about infatuation?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m posting here as I&#8217;m apple fan and spend lots of time conversing with other apple fans, you dislike apple and you&#8217;re spending bonks of time posting in numerous MDN article forums and you say others have &#8216;infatuation&#8217; ???? . Man, who has got the issues here?</p>
<p>rotfl !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm dwyer</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norm dwyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I also believe… that this suit has tainted the previously good relationship between Apple and Samsung, [one of ]its component supplier[s],”   REALLY!? You don&#039;t think it was Samsung&#039;s blatant copying of Apple designs that soured the relationship?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I also believe… that this suit has tainted the previously good relationship between Apple and Samsung, [one of ]its component supplier[s],”   REALLY!? You don&#8217;t think it was Samsung&#8217;s blatant copying of Apple designs that soured the relationship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flimbiss</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flimbiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I already blown your &#039;too fast = bad decisions&#039; theory so now is &quot;wait for what is forthcoming&quot; ...?

lol.

cluessless so called ex VP of GM who does not know that GM&#039;s own sub Nexteer sold parts to Ford and said that &quot;Apple can&#039;t win against many&quot;.. (like davewrite refuted: iPod). 

and like apple haters every where, when they get chewed and made to look like fools it&#039;s name calling : &quot;Cult of Mac&quot; ...  well you&#039;re cult of ignorance and stupidity. lol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already blown your &#8216;too fast = bad decisions&#8217; theory so now is &#8220;wait for what is forthcoming&#8221; &#8230;?</p>
<p>lol.</p>
<p>cluessless so called ex VP of GM who does not know that GM&#8217;s own sub Nexteer sold parts to Ford and said that &#8220;Apple can&#8217;t win against many&#8221;.. (like davewrite refuted: iPod). </p>
<p>and like apple haters every where, when they get chewed and made to look like fools it&#8217;s name calling : &#8220;Cult of Mac&#8221; &#8230;  well you&#8217;re cult of ignorance and stupidity. lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Currie</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Currie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I also believe… that this suit has tainted the previously good relationship between Apple and Samsung&lt;/i&gt;

Entirely blame Samsung. They did the dirty deed. They got caught. They paid the penalty.

OF COURSE Apple is pulling out of Samsung! What did Samsung expect? The blithering idiots. They blew a hole through their own head. Samsung&#039;s ripping off of Apple was plain old SUICIDE.

I will never understand why companies commit self-destructive acts. Hello Samsung stock holders! The current management is killing the company! Time for a change into the positive direction! Kill the killers and get back to doing REAL work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I also believe… that this suit has tainted the previously good relationship between Apple and Samsung</i></p>
<p>Entirely blame Samsung. They did the dirty deed. They got caught. They paid the penalty.</p>
<p>OF COURSE Apple is pulling out of Samsung! What did Samsung expect? The blithering idiots. They blew a hole through their own head. Samsung&#8217;s ripping off of Apple was plain old SUICIDE.</p>
<p>I will never understand why companies commit self-destructive acts. Hello Samsung stock holders! The current management is killing the company! Time for a change into the positive direction! Kill the killers and get back to doing REAL work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a breath… and read what the legal community is saying and please pay particular attention to what the loose canon Jury Foreman has already said.

Appeals and lot&#039;s to them will be forthcoming and yes expect the Feds to get involved as the diplomatic phone calls are already flowing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a breath… and read what the legal community is saying and please pay particular attention to what the loose canon Jury Foreman has already said.</p>
<p>Appeals and lot&#8217;s to them will be forthcoming and yes expect the Feds to get involved as the diplomatic phone calls are already flowing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see what Apple products will look like in terms of quality and sustainability post Samsung.  Easy to just say F Samsung but they are the reason why Apple makes so much money as Apple sells their brand as being a higher grade brand than PC.  Not sure this will hold true sans Samsung who even today rank 49 components in the top 3 in their respective category.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see what Apple products will look like in terms of quality and sustainability post Samsung.  Easy to just say F Samsung but they are the reason why Apple makes so much money as Apple sells their brand as being a higher grade brand than PC.  Not sure this will hold true sans Samsung who even today rank 49 components in the top 3 in their respective category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have no clue what you are talking about, as once again you come across like the rest of the disciples who talk nothing but nonsense.  You sir could not even come close to assist me in deciphering Steve Job&#039;s comments as the comments are very easily understood.

Listen Apple Cult members, you all have a hate on for Microsoft, Android, Samsung, etc… and this is AOK but please do not come off like brainwashed robots as the latter is extremely scary.  

As I often times say, I enjoy Apple products and own several of them but I am not a big fan of the Cult like Culture as the Culture is self-righteous and the associated self proclaimed prophecy is getting old.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have no clue what you are talking about, as once again you come across like the rest of the disciples who talk nothing but nonsense.  You sir could not even come close to assist me in deciphering Steve Job&#8217;s comments as the comments are very easily understood.</p>
<p>Listen Apple Cult members, you all have a hate on for Microsoft, Android, Samsung, etc… and this is AOK but please do not come off like brainwashed robots as the latter is extremely scary.  </p>
<p>As I often times say, I enjoy Apple products and own several of them but I am not a big fan of the Cult like Culture as the Culture is self-righteous and the associated self proclaimed prophecy is getting old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow a whole lot of verbiage to make what point?  I am not denying that stealing is not common place in business in general and by no means am I even remotely suggesting that Samsung is the poster child for Honesty and Transparency.

As for your infatuation with Apple goes…. well no comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow a whole lot of verbiage to make what point?  I am not denying that stealing is not common place in business in general and by no means am I even remotely suggesting that Samsung is the poster child for Honesty and Transparency.</p>
<p>As for your infatuation with Apple goes…. well no comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forni</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pat &quot;Ex GM Canada VP here&quot;

if you were actually a GM vp, did they fire you for dumbness?

you didn&#039;t even know about your own companies Nexteer&#039;s connections... 

if your friends at gm saw your posts being ripped apart they&#039;ll be laughing their heads off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pat &#8220;Ex GM Canada VP here&#8221;</p>
<p>if you were actually a GM vp, did they fire you for dumbness?</p>
<p>you didn&#8217;t even know about your own companies Nexteer&#8217;s connections&#8230; </p>
<p>if your friends at gm saw your posts being ripped apart they&#8217;ll be laughing their heads off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janekg</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[janekg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the money Apple Inc. has accumalated surely they could make their own essential component parts or at least acquire someone who does. Is this not feasible?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the money Apple Inc. has accumalated surely they could make their own essential component parts or at least acquire someone who does. Is this not feasible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flimbiss</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flimbiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Had the Jury deliberated for an extra 7 to 10 days and asked for clarification on a few items&quot;

you claim that you are an expert in international law and that the process of the trial is wonky because the jury did it fast...

well expert in international law, if there was a murder (a serious crime) but where the charged was seen by ten witnesses and videotaped by four phone cameras and one surveillance camera, where his DNA was found at scene, on the victim and the murder weapon and the gun was registered to him and he was arrested at the scene holding the gun over the victim..

and the jury decided he was guilty very fast.. is it flawed?

the jury in samsung apple case said they arrived at it so quickly because over the WEEKs of the case they had seen the evidence against samsung (DNA, gun, witnesses) was absolutely compelling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Had the Jury deliberated for an extra 7 to 10 days and asked for clarification on a few items&#8221;</p>
<p>you claim that you are an expert in international law and that the process of the trial is wonky because the jury did it fast&#8230;</p>
<p>well expert in international law, if there was a murder (a serious crime) but where the charged was seen by ten witnesses and videotaped by four phone cameras and one surveillance camera, where his DNA was found at scene, on the victim and the murder weapon and the gun was registered to him and he was arrested at the scene holding the gun over the victim..</p>
<p>and the jury decided he was guilty very fast.. is it flawed?</p>
<p>the jury in samsung apple case said they arrived at it so quickly because over the WEEKs of the case they had seen the evidence against samsung (DNA, gun, witnesses) was absolutely compelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flimbiss</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flimbiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the more you argue Pat the dumber you look.

gm for example owns parts suppliers that sell to eveyone.

example they used to own nexteer (which they sold not too long ago).  Autotrend &quot;General Motors isn’t the only customer served by Nexteer. The company is a supplier of auto parts for Toyota, Ford, PSA Peugeot Citroen, Fiat and Chrysler,&quot;

enough?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the more you argue Pat the dumber you look.</p>
<p>gm for example owns parts suppliers that sell to eveyone.</p>
<p>example they used to own nexteer (which they sold not too long ago).  Autotrend &#8220;General Motors isn’t the only customer served by Nexteer. The company is a supplier of auto parts for Toyota, Ford, PSA Peugeot Citroen, Fiat and Chrysler,&#8221;</p>
<p>enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phareen</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phareen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pat your posts are so filled with stupidity it&#039;s hard to start to reply on it.

did you actually listen to Steve&#039;s Jobs interview where he said theat quote : good artist copies great artists steal? He was quoting Picasso. Picasso meant that inferior artists marely make copies (e.g photocopy machine Samsung) while great artists take ideas from all over and through history in different discplines and TRANSFORM them into their own unique works of art. 

In Jobs interview he explainst that at Apple people were artists, musicians, poets and they TRANSFORMED art into engineering for mac!! Before apple tech companies seldom looked at ARTS for inspiration, that&#039;s what Jobs was talking about. 

sure Picasso &#039;stole&#039; but does anybody doubt he&#039;s a unique artist? even non artists can recognise a picasso, 

Samsung transforms squat , they even copie pictures and colors of ICONS !!

I won&#039;t even bother to answer the other nonsense in your posts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pat your posts are so filled with stupidity it&#8217;s hard to start to reply on it.</p>
<p>did you actually listen to Steve&#8217;s Jobs interview where he said theat quote : good artist copies great artists steal? He was quoting Picasso. Picasso meant that inferior artists marely make copies (e.g photocopy machine Samsung) while great artists take ideas from all over and through history in different discplines and TRANSFORM them into their own unique works of art. </p>
<p>In Jobs interview he explainst that at Apple people were artists, musicians, poets and they TRANSFORMED art into engineering for mac!! Before apple tech companies seldom looked at ARTS for inspiration, that&#8217;s what Jobs was talking about. </p>
<p>sure Picasso &#8216;stole&#8217; but does anybody doubt he&#8217;s a unique artist? even non artists can recognise a picasso, </p>
<p>Samsung transforms squat , they even copie pictures and colors of ICONS !!</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t even bother to answer the other nonsense in your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deasystems</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deasystems]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re confused, Pat. Apple doesn&#039;t steal and Apple doesn&#039;t copy. What Apple does do is to take the best ideas (that&#039;s what that Jobs quote is all about) and use them in beautifully realized devices.

Patents don&#039;t protect ideas; they protect the *expression* of ideas. Apple sued Samsung because it copied Apple&#039;s expression of ideas, i.e. its actual devices and software.

I&#039;m amazed that you don&#039;t appear to understand that important distinction. I gave you the benefit of the doubt when I stated that you are confused but perhaps you&#039;re really trying to deceive and mislead. If so, shame on you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re confused, Pat. Apple doesn&#8217;t steal and Apple doesn&#8217;t copy. What Apple does do is to take the best ideas (that&#8217;s what that Jobs quote is all about) and use them in beautifully realized devices.</p>
<p>Patents don&#8217;t protect ideas; they protect the *expression* of ideas. Apple sued Samsung because it copied Apple&#8217;s expression of ideas, i.e. its actual devices and software.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m amazed that you don&#8217;t appear to understand that important distinction. I gave you the benefit of the doubt when I stated that you are confused but perhaps you&#8217;re really trying to deceive and mislead. If so, shame on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twodales</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[twodales]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transmissions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transmissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davewrite</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davewrite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you are right that Pats posts are full nonsense.

I didn&#039;t even bother to reply to Pats stupidity here.

I replied in Pats previous posts on another article where pat said that &quot;apple can&#039;t hope to win against everyone&quot;.

I replied &quot;iPod&quot;. 

(pat has the gall to say &quot;Let’s be 100% clear as some of you folks are just so out of touch with business that it hurts to read your post&quot;  )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are right that Pats posts are full nonsense.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t even bother to reply to Pats stupidity here.</p>
<p>I replied in Pats previous posts on another article where pat said that &#8220;apple can&#8217;t hope to win against everyone&#8221;.</p>
<p>I replied &#8220;iPod&#8221;. </p>
<p>(pat has the gall to say &#8220;Let’s be 100% clear as some of you folks are just so out of touch with business that it hurts to read your post&#8221;  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ex GM Canada VP here and my bubble is just fine.  We might buy from a common vendor like PPG Glass, Good Year, Dunlop, etc… but We DO NOT BUY parts from one another. 

My point is what makes up a Corvette is 100% GM and there are no Mustang or GT 500 parts to be found.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ex GM Canada VP here and my bubble is just fine.  We might buy from a common vendor like PPG Glass, Good Year, Dunlop, etc… but We DO NOT BUY parts from one another. </p>
<p>My point is what makes up a Corvette is 100% GM and there are no Mustang or GT 500 parts to be found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am well versed in International Law hence the behaviour and comments of the Jury Foreman since the reading of the verdict will be cause enough for the Appeal to be granted and expect more influence from the Court in terms of having tech experts 100% independent of both Apple and Samsung review the legitimacy of the Patents that were granted and of course the relevant facts that need to be evaluated with regards to proving guilt or innocence.  Had the Jury deliberated for an extra 7 to 10 days and asked for clarification on a few items and of course the Jury Foreman shutting the hell up then this case would not appear to have been swayed by a singular voice and that being the voice of the verbose Jury Foreman who has a USA registered Patent under his belt.

By no means do I think that Samsung is innocent as frankly none of the tech co&#039;s are as they ALL copy with a tweak here and there but to condemn Samsung of stealing is another thing and this is what this Jury did hence why the Appeal will be filled and accepted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am well versed in International Law hence the behaviour and comments of the Jury Foreman since the reading of the verdict will be cause enough for the Appeal to be granted and expect more influence from the Court in terms of having tech experts 100% independent of both Apple and Samsung review the legitimacy of the Patents that were granted and of course the relevant facts that need to be evaluated with regards to proving guilt or innocence.  Had the Jury deliberated for an extra 7 to 10 days and asked for clarification on a few items and of course the Jury Foreman shutting the hell up then this case would not appear to have been swayed by a singular voice and that being the voice of the verbose Jury Foreman who has a USA registered Patent under his belt.</p>
<p>By no means do I think that Samsung is innocent as frankly none of the tech co&#8217;s are as they ALL copy with a tweak here and there but to condemn Samsung of stealing is another thing and this is what this Jury did hence why the Appeal will be filled and accepted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also agree with Mees in terms of his last sentence and indeed I would not like it one bit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree with Mees in terms of his last sentence and indeed I would not like it one bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry Mason</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perry Mason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat, I would love to know what credentials you have that qualify you to make such definite predictions regarding the outcome of the appeals in this case. From your comments it appears to me that you know very little about the U.S. federal court system. Federal judges, while not entirely apolitical, generally take comfort in their lifetime appointments and routinely ignore political winds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, I would love to know what credentials you have that qualify you to make such definite predictions regarding the outcome of the appeals in this case. From your comments it appears to me that you know very little about the U.S. federal court system. Federal judges, while not entirely apolitical, generally take comfort in their lifetime appointments and routinely ignore political winds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about just about everything they do which by the way Ubermac is no different then any other company on this earth.  You copy what works disregards what does not and move on.

Steve Jobs did not make that comment to simply waste a breath.  Check out what he did a Pixar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about just about everything they do which by the way Ubermac is no different then any other company on this earth.  You copy what works disregards what does not and move on.</p>
<p>Steve Jobs did not make that comment to simply waste a breath.  Check out what he did a Pixar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twodales</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[twodales]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat said:
Let’s be 100% clear as some of you folks are just so out of touch with business that it hurts to read your posts. GM does NOT buy parts from Ford, get it?

Sorry to burst your bubble pal but they certainly do buy parts from each other.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat said:<br />
Let’s be 100% clear as some of you folks are just so out of touch with business that it hurts to read your posts. GM does NOT buy parts from Ford, get it?</p>
<p>Sorry to burst your bubble pal but they certainly do buy parts from each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SameSung</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SameSung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google maps out
YouTube out
Zagat out(apple preferred yelp and opentable)
Google search?(still there but Siri is probably bypassing google)
Google search out(at least in China which opted for Baidu)
Samsung display out (apple opted for lg and sharp)
They&#039;ve been decreasing Samsung display for new ipad already

The iPhone accounts for 2/3 of mobile browsing. Just imagine if Apple uses bing or yAhoo as default(but I  doubt  it)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google maps out<br />
YouTube out<br />
Zagat out(apple preferred yelp and opentable)<br />
Google search?(still there but Siri is probably bypassing google)<br />
Google search out(at least in China which opted for Baidu)<br />
Samsung display out (apple opted for lg and sharp)<br />
They&#8217;ve been decreasing Samsung display for new ipad already</p>
<p>The iPhone accounts for 2/3 of mobile browsing. Just imagine if Apple uses bing or yAhoo as default(but I  doubt  it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubermac</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ubermac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat, not sure what you are smoking. Probably all the cheap lies that are spread by the Fandroid cool aid junkies in the forums. 

Name one thing that Apple stole, just one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, not sure what you are smoking. Probably all the cheap lies that are spread by the Fandroid cool aid junkies in the forums. </p>
<p>Name one thing that Apple stole, just one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legend</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the whole, a well-reasoned, thoughtful post, Pat, but I think &quot;Mees&quot; hit the nail on the head.

BTW:  it&#039;s = it is; its = possessive pronoun, the one you meant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the whole, a well-reasoned, thoughtful post, Pat, but I think &#8220;Mees&#8221; hit the nail on the head.</p>
<p>BTW:  it&#8217;s = it is; its = possessive pronoun, the one you meant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no interest in defending Samsung, but in the same breath not a fan of the self-righteousness that Apple Cult Members bestow on Apple.  They do their share of copying and stealing and they always and always will.  
A good artist copies and a great artist steals.  Steve Jobs

The US Judiciary will not allow this verdict to stand as the Jury Foreman&#039;s comments probably have already raised red flags at the US Department of Justice and the US does NOT want the World to think that a US Jury singled handily issued a verdict that clearly favoured a US based company at the latter is not good for business.
My point is simple, in that Samsung is so heavily entrenched into Apple products, that a shift to lesser knowns in terms of quality could be damaging to the Apple brand which folks pay a premium for to own it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no interest in defending Samsung, but in the same breath not a fan of the self-righteousness that Apple Cult Members bestow on Apple.  They do their share of copying and stealing and they always and always will.<br />
A good artist copies and a great artist steals.  Steve Jobs</p>
<p>The US Judiciary will not allow this verdict to stand as the Jury Foreman&#8217;s comments probably have already raised red flags at the US Department of Justice and the US does NOT want the World to think that a US Jury singled handily issued a verdict that clearly favoured a US based company at the latter is not good for business.<br />
My point is simple, in that Samsung is so heavily entrenched into Apple products, that a shift to lesser knowns in terms of quality could be damaging to the Apple brand which folks pay a premium for to own it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All of this talk suggests that you all think that this Jury verdict will hold and sadly it will not.  Life will go on as it was prior to this trial and others which are filled in all sorts of jurisdictions around the World.

Let&#039;s be 100% clear as some of you folks are just so out of touch with business that it hurts to read your posts.  GM does NOT buy parts from Ford!  Get it?

Apple needs to buy parts from Samsung, LG, Sony, and God knows how many more suppliers who are or can be in conflict with Apple due to either directly competing against them of supplying other companies with the same parts they sell Apple.

As it stands, the fact remains that Apple is caught between a rock and a hard place as they damned if they do and damned if they don&#039;t.  

Having a stockpile of shareholder money does nothing for you as that money is money earned and Apple needs to protect it from being used in a failed attempt to try and make a point with your top line parts suppliers.

Do not think for a second that Samsung Group (yes the Group of Companies) will play second fiddle to Apple or anyone else hence given that we ask Countries to avoid Wars by talking things out, the same will happen between Apple and Samsung.

Look whether Apple Cult members like it or not, to this day Apple and Microsoft work closely together and that is just a fact of life.  No one company can go at it alone and that includes private and public companies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of this talk suggests that you all think that this Jury verdict will hold and sadly it will not.  Life will go on as it was prior to this trial and others which are filled in all sorts of jurisdictions around the World.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be 100% clear as some of you folks are just so out of touch with business that it hurts to read your posts.  GM does NOT buy parts from Ford!  Get it?</p>
<p>Apple needs to buy parts from Samsung, LG, Sony, and God knows how many more suppliers who are or can be in conflict with Apple due to either directly competing against them of supplying other companies with the same parts they sell Apple.</p>
<p>As it stands, the fact remains that Apple is caught between a rock and a hard place as they damned if they do and damned if they don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>Having a stockpile of shareholder money does nothing for you as that money is money earned and Apple needs to protect it from being used in a failed attempt to try and make a point with your top line parts suppliers.</p>
<p>Do not think for a second that Samsung Group (yes the Group of Companies) will play second fiddle to Apple or anyone else hence given that we ask Countries to avoid Wars by talking things out, the same will happen between Apple and Samsung.</p>
<p>Look whether Apple Cult members like it or not, to this day Apple and Microsoft work closely together and that is just a fact of life.  No one company can go at it alone and that includes private and public companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MEES</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/27/tim-bajarin-apple-could-eventually-dump-samsung-as-a-component-supplier-altogether/comment-page-1/#comment-1027358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MEES]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88635#comment-1027358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat, Samsung&#039;s days as a partner are numbered. Samsung could have been a great long term partner but they acted shamefully and with disrespect. Apple will look to do business with a partner it can trust. While it may continue to use some Samsung chips, Samsung will lose considerable investment as investors will look to follow Apple and invest in Apple&#039;s new partners instead.

Samsung has real competition with Sharp and Sony as well as LG. Apple has been shown to be interested in future production from them already.

It is going to be hard to overturn the verdicts in an appeals court. Face it, it may be even worse for Samsung if the other courts find more in favor of Apple and Samsung&#039;s aggressive stance on copying, stealing, lying, etc.  Samsung&#039;s reputation will tank if they go that route.

Pat, how would you feel if your business partners stole your inventions and started competing directly against you? You would be outraged, so why defend Samsung?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, Samsung&#8217;s days as a partner are numbered. Samsung could have been a great long term partner but they acted shamefully and with disrespect. Apple will look to do business with a partner it can trust. While it may continue to use some Samsung chips, Samsung will lose considerable investment as investors will look to follow Apple and invest in Apple&#8217;s new partners instead.</p>
<p>Samsung has real competition with Sharp and Sony as well as LG. Apple has been shown to be interested in future production from them already.</p>
<p>It is going to be hard to overturn the verdicts in an appeals court. Face it, it may be even worse for Samsung if the other courts find more in favor of Apple and Samsung&#8217;s aggressive stance on copying, stealing, lying, etc.  Samsung&#8217;s reputation will tank if they go that route.</p>
<p>Pat, how would you feel if your business partners stole your inventions and started competing directly against you? You would be outraged, so why defend Samsung?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
